What are your thoughts on this gentleman?

What are your thoughts on this gentleman?
Was he right?

Attached: otto_weininger_1050x700.jpg (1050x700, 409K)

he had mommy issues and a deep-seated castration complex, of course he was right.

some of the best quotes on jews and women you'll ever find come from that jew.

>The most inferior man is still infinitely superior to the most superior woman, so much so that it seems hardly permissible to compare and rank them.
>Woman’s mind is neither deep nor high, either acute nor direct, but the precise opposite of all this. As far as we can see at present, she has no “mind” at all: woman as a whole is mindless, or mindlessness itself.
>The desire to be the object of sexual intercourse is the strongest desire of woman, but it is only a special instance of her deepest interest, indeed her only vital interest, which aims at sexual intercourse as such—her wish that there should be as much sexual intercourse as possible, no matter by whom, where, and when.
>Now it is possible to answer the question which was formulated as the central problem at the beginning of this second part, the question about what it means to be Man and to be Woman. Women have no existence and no essence, they are not and they are nothing. One IS Man or one IS Woman, depending on whether or not one IS somebody.
>"Sex and Character" - Otto Weininger

Attached: Danaides_by_John_William_Waterhouse,_1903.jpg (2133x3000, 1.6M)

Based incel

looks like mentally ill

toxic

Roasties fuck off.

>as much sexual intercourse as possible, no matter by whom
So incels are all volcels?

He's talking about women's desire for intercourse to take place in general, no matter by who, not that women themselves would have intercourse with any random man.