Intellectual

Intellectual

Attached: nassim-taleb.jpg (500x489, 58K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dzVAuN8XxnE
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682183/
pnas.org/content/pnas/111/42/15273.full.pdf
helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/38881/HECER_DP364.pdf
livescience.com/15388-discovery-channel-tutankhamen-dna.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

yet arab

Imbecile

I love him so much.

Attached: Thales.jpg (683x487, 72K)

Phoenican, BS vendor

MUH OLIVE OIL

MUH SQUID INK

*pseudo-*

youtube.com/watch?v=dzVAuN8XxnE

Why do Americans love the "camera focuses on the actor as if to telegraph his big 'Let me tell you something, pal! I've been waitin' all through this scene to tell you this, and I've finally had enough of you and I'm gonna give you the monologue of your life now!' monologue" trope so much?

Imbeciles, Taleb is the ubermensch Nietzsche predicted.

ntaleb is an idiot who thinks IQ isnt real and that jeffrey epstein actually suicided himself. I lost a lot of respect for that guy since I started following him on twitter.

Imbecile, maybe IQ is real but if so people like Claire are doing a terrible job and arguing it.

some rando asked ntaleb on twitter why africa is such a shithole compared to white nations and all he could do was call him a nazi and "hurr durr correlation is not causation". if anything he is doing a terrible job arguing against it.

It's the ancient curse.

lmao

Lebanon is not Arabic, hardly anyone speaks Arabic in Lebanon. He is 3/4 Greek, 1/2 Phoenician, 100% Roman, gabisch?

I'm sure that if you think about it really hard you could imagine a couple reasons as to why Africa is the way it is besides IQ.

let me guess: white oppression?
please give me a reasonable explanation beyond IQ why sub saharan africans had no written history and never even built anything bigger than a two story house before the white man set foot on their continent. please explain why the most ressource rich continent on the planet is one of the most impoverished shitholes. I guess its all just a big coincidence that these people have the lowest average IQ.

based but you stole my post

Its the environment they live in

so why are african americans after hundreds of years in the US on average still dumber, poorer and more violent than other races? its almost as if performance is tied to IQ which is tied to race. but according to ntaleb believing this makes you an eugenicist and a nazi.

and why have whites turned countries like zimbabwe or south africa into some of the richest nations on the continent when they ruled them? I mean its the same environment these blacks live in after all. and once whitey left those countries went to shit again even though the environment hasnt changed. how do you explain that?

Segregation ended in the 60's and its probably going to take another century or so to integrate them properly so the flynn effect can go into full swing. Blacks are still heavily oppressed psychologically and socially in this country so its gonna take some time

Because western European colonizers had all the tools and knowledge for success from centuries worth of worldly knowledge to apply.

lol what about africa where blacks where never colonized? those are just as fucked up.
but anyway I dont even want to get into this stupid discussion again. the point is that you can be a retard about IQ and blame it all on whitey (like you do). but ntaleb isnt even willing to have that discussion he will just call you a nazi and end it right there. that is intellectually dishonest.

and blacks didnt because... ?
its not like blacks werent among themselves for thousands of years before whitey set foot on their continent.

I didn't blame whitey or colonization. I'm blaming isolation

They were isolated, Europeans, middle easterners, Indians and Asians had been exchanging knowledge and information for centuries

The deserts and bad soil in Africa are located in North Africa, the only place in Africa that has good heritage and civilisation, also the place inhabited by non-blacks. You white cucks need to stop making excuses for blacks. Why are you such cucks? What is it about their ugly face, low intelligence and repulsive "culture" that you love so much?

>muh isolation
yeah that really sucks. if only blacks had ever invented ships or even a wheel so they could have travelled and exchanged information. or even a written language so they could store information. but I guess that needs a higher IQ. so here we are back to square one again. anyway as I said Im not even really interested in having this stupid discussion again where people make excuses for the most incompetent, laziest and dumbest race on the planet. if you wanna be a retard and make those arguments, fair enough.
but for a self-described intellectuall like ntaleb to completely shut down this discussion and call people "nazis" who want to talk about it... that is intellectually dishonest.

I'm Korean but you've basically proven yourself as the average historically shallow minded racist so there's no point in arguing with you about this anymore

To be fair you do sound like a "nazi" which isnt the world Taleb is using but discussion with racists gets pointless and its not intellectually dishonest to dismiss them

>I ran out of arguments so I will just call you a racist

You're delusional. I know my history and unlike you am not a brainwashed religious nut. Only religious people would believe in evolution among animals but not among humans. What so unplausible about thinking that blacks are inferior due to their genes? Keep making excuses and become eventually you will practice dysgenic behaviour and subscribe to blacked porn.

Why did blacks isolate themselves? Why didn't they venture?

Did they lack the technological means? Why? How?

>its not intellectually dishonest to dismiss them
it is absolutely intellectually dishonest to dismiss people based on arbitrary labels instead of refuting arguments. and from a guy like ntaleb I would have expected more than that.

I'm not religious and I never denied the heritable of intelligence. I'm starting to think you're a troll that just wants yous though

He did refute the arguments on IQ

I don't give a fuck about (yous) from effeminate race-deniers. You lack testosterone and logic. My country (Afghanistan) which is at war is literally safer than the average 20%+ black city in the US. Hope one day you get a major reality check.

>>thinks IQ is pseudoscience

DROPPPED

They lacked horses for one

not in that twitter thread he didnt. all he said was that if you believe performance is tied to IQ which is tied to race you are a eugenicist and that makes you a bad person not even worth talking to. that is intellectual dishonesty as far as Im concerned. if he has actual arguments on why africa is such a shithole that are not related to IQ I would actually like to read them.

They lack curiosity and arbitrary thinking. Not only do they lack intelligence but they are simply not an adventurous race.

>heavily oppressed psychologically and socially
made me kek

I'm not denying race and I hope one day you can understand the reality of the world as well. Also no offence but in STEM fields African Americans have achieved much more than Afghans in the modern era

just ride a zebra

>why africa is such a shithole
It's not as bad as you think it is. Nowhere is ever as bad as a propagandist would like you to believe as an Afghan you should know that

>I understand the world and you dont
>I could explain it to you but instead I'll just dismiss you and call you names
see this is what you would expect from a Yea Forums poster but from a self proclaimed intellectual like nassim taleb I would expect a bit more.

You can not compare Afghans in Afghanistan to black Americans in America. Blacks in America are on average 23% white (traitorous slave masters bred with them). American white also have an unhealthy black-worship mentality that makes them do things like hire sub-par blacks and admit sub-par blacks in good universities. Afghans also have a rich history going back 4000 years, resisted colonisation (by Alexander the Great, Brits, Russians and are currently resisting Amerimutts) and also never complain or expect hand-outs.

Attached: african-civilisation-arab-slavetrade.png (1405x589, 277K)

I did explain things to you . You didnt, you dismissed me, you accused me of saying things I didnt, and you baselessly insulted me multiple times. I only called you a racist which is accurate and not really offensive.

It is, the built parts are in foreign dime, several of those countries do not pay back their debts at all despite selling natural resources like oil, Zimbabwe is starving right now because they kicked out white people, they had to beg for them back and have whites installed in the cabinet but it’s still not working because they just can’t fucking farm.

you might mistake me for the brown skinned gentleman who called you a cuck. anyways Im not really interested in your opinion anyway I WAS interested in talebs before he started acting like a fag on twitter.

>angry that he demolished IQ because you can't use it anymore to talk about black people

lol look at yourselves

I lived in Zimbabwe for 2 years, trust me when I tell you this my afghan friend, western media and the majority of the internet are propaganda machines that don't represent reality

>wrecks taleb

Attached: claire_lehmann.jpg (1200x643, 82K)

He made very good points on psychometric testing but he gets quite emotional at times. I wouldn't dismiss him entirely over that

I did not write that post, however, I don't think people are claiming black countries are unliveable. The argument is over whether there is a difference in intelligence and human character (empathy, ingenuity etc.)

I think there's a difference but its quite malleable over generations

If Taleb's IQ arguments are wrong, why can't somebody just show mathematical proofs?

IQ is real. Race is real. Racial IQ differences are real.

Attached: 1562684517510.png (686x684, 766K)

>IQ is real.

You know that just saying something doesn't make it so, right? Just show mathematical proofs contra Taleb. For something so "real" and "obvious", it shouldn't be that difficult.

Attached: race. more than skin 01.png (864x510, 527K)

Retard

Attached: serveimage-35.jpg (620x380, 80K)

If skull structure, hair colour, skin colour, body-to-limb ratios, bone density etc. are evolved differently, what is this magic power that stopped brains from from being different? You are religious and you don't even know it.

Again, if it's so real and obvious, just post proofs. If you can't, maybe you should ask yourself why that is.

>what is this magic power that stopped brains from from being different

Perhaps that's the difference between people like you and actual (data) scientists. The actual answer to this question is, "I wouldn't know", but you, being a genius, have already made your conclusion and you're now working backwards.

You've asserted a statement about data that you can't even provide a basic mathematical argument for.

Attached: ggnore.png (3071x3763, 3.44M)

Oh ya well how come Africa never even had a written language?

>IQ is real
Well duh, it exists as a metric that people have proposed and endorsed. For a metric, a purely conceptual categorization that is not any tangible thing, the question is not reality but validity and soundness. That is, can it be defined and measured consistently, and is it significant as a category, does it really correspond to what people intuitively understand as intelligence? Do even the founding assumptions such as "intelligence" being normally distributed (or if it can even be quantified) hold up, let alone the tests people devise to extract these quantities? You can talk about all sorts of correlations but you cannot even define it, you can only give as a source the tests people use to circularly measure this undefined quantity, and substantiate it only on the authority of the people designing and making the tests who may well be disconnected from one another. Beneath all these data and whatnot lies nothing but hot air, only impositions and circular assertions. And before you misconstrue anything, the matter is not whether intelligence is variable or heritable, but whether it can be sensibly quantified by this IQ or otherwise.

You keep asking for mathematical equations. You only need to look at average IQs of populations and then see if there is a significant link with standards of living, number of patents, inventions, income or any other metric. This is a simple statistical procedure done many times already. Do you want to links to specific papers?

Based Afghan brother
I've never met another Afghan outside of family/family friends in my life (probably because there aren't many of us who are middle class) so it warms my heart knowing there are educated Afghan's out there.
Honestly I feel disconnected from my culture and heritage although I'm currently learning about Islamic history. Any advice to combat these issues?
t. Afghan born Brit

Holy shit, now I understand why Taleb blocks the fuck out of people.

If you don't know anything about statistics except that Pearson correlations exist, please don't talk about it.

Attached: adiandfriendsharealaugh.jpg (1600x1323, 493K)

Intelligence and creativity:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682183/
It was found that the rated originality of the top two answers a person gave was correlated with their IQ at 0.36, the average originality of their answers correlated at 0.35, and the “ideational fluency” correlated with IQ at 0.22.

Heritability of IQ and educational attainment:
pnas.org/content/pnas/111/42/15273.full.pdf
data on more than 13,000 twins and found that variation in high school test (GSCE) scores was 62% attribute to genes and 26% attributable to shared environment

IQ and income:
helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/38881/HECER_DP364.pdf
Using 15 years of data on Finnish twins, we find that 24% (54%) of the variance of
women’s (men’s) lifetime income is due to genetic factors and that the contribution of the
shared environment is negligible.

I could go on. You are blind and religious (not in a good sense as worshipping God, instead you worship some ugly useless race of people God knows why)

I am Afghan in the UK too. I am young and still finding my way so I can't give any good advise and will tell just tell you what I believe. To keep connected to your roots you need to marry within your ethnicity and have many children (at least 3/4). Don't fall for the race-mixing agenda set in place by negrified Amerimutts. I currently have a white gf (it's not race-mixing as we have the same phenotype, but it is still wrong) but I will leave her and marry an Afghan. Also, ethnicity and culture should always come before religion. I used to be religious but going to a mosque and seeing that I share a religion with racially and culturally inferior people has distanced me from Islam. Although early Arab muslims were incredibly racist, the current Muslims have become whipped and lost their manliness. Hope you do well and find what you're looking for.

Needless to say, what exactly are you aiming at with making all those statements about IQ? That's just the CPU speed. You still need the software to do anything with it. Human beings are not just purely genetic actors, they're memetic actors too. They inherit ideas and cultural values that shape their belief and their behavior, which is why it is important to educate the people. Western world is so great because we are able to have everyone read great novels and learn great stuff that shapes their beliefs into something that is not barbaric, the rest of the world doesn't have that and that's all that makes the difference.

Personally I don't even care about IQ that much. Turks for example who have much lower IQs than whites have still achieved a lot. Chinese supposedly have high IQs but they don't have souls. I just don't like it when self-professed liberals deny racial science but parrot every thing else they think makes them look smart. Liberals claim racists are wrong because "science", they truly believe that truth is on their side and sometimes it's so baffling to me because race is something that is so obviously real.

>what is Egypt

Inb4 Egyptians were Caucasians.
Egypt developed from the South to the North and literally no Egyptologist denies they were Indigeneous Africans.

Interesting fact: Roman script is derived from Greek script which was in turn derived from Phoenician script and lastly Phoenician script is derived from the hieroglyphs.

No one denies they are indigenous to Africa. But they are not negroe. Egyptians actually prove the inferiority of negroes. They lived in a desert climate and achieved so much, while sub-Saharan Africans haven't done anything noteworthy while they had more recourses and a more suitable climate.

>what is gue'ez
>what is berber script
>what are hieroglyphs
Also threadly reminder that virtually all forms of writing used in European languages are derived from Middle Eastern and north African alphabets. Yet that's true for Greek and Cyrillic alphabet too.

>Egyptians used to live in arid resourceless desert
>ignoring the Nile

The earliest predynastic Egyptians were dark skinned and indigineous to Africa. Don't know what else you would call them than Negroes.

Attached: sphinx of ghiza.jpg (576x390, 38K)

Egypt used to be lush.

the pharaos were literally white user. see pic related.
only nogs they had were all slave cattle lmao

where do these cultural ideas and values come from? they do not fall from the sky you know? they were made from people and if people like africans have zero culture and history then whose fault is it.

Attached: 2019-08-14_2202[1].png (822x328, 37K)

>But Carsten Pusch, a geneticist at Germany's University of Tubingen who was part of the team that unraveled Tut's DNA from samples taken from his mummy and mummies of his family members, said that iGENEA's claims are "simply impossible."

>"Dr. Albert Zink from the EURAC [European Academy of Bolzano, an independent research center] in Bolzano and co-author of the 2010 JAMA publication screened the footage and confirmed that the company acts very unscientific," Pusch wrote in an email to LiveScience.

livescience.com/15388-discovery-channel-tutankhamen-dna.html

Literally published two days after the alleged connection of Tut with Europeans. You should be up to date before you're going to cite scientific articles.

Afghans here in the UK have a reputation for being worthless drug-dealing scum, barely a step above travellers.

breh do you live in Leeds by any chance? Most the friends I've made have been either too old or too liberal for me to get along with.

Literally never met/seen an Afghan drug dealer. But the opinion of Brits doesn't matter because white Brits let us immigrate here, which is only one of many reasons that makes them traitorous. The opinion of men who let their daughters miscegenate is worthless.

London. I have the same problem as I'm not close to a lot of Afghans other than family and a few family friends. When I get married to someone from back home it will be different though.

The Sphinx was altered and its nose was cut off by Nubians after they invaded Egypt. Try harder next time.

Attached: 1f5fe1614b79f18ffe1e749e338d4a10.jpg (230x337, 10K)

>Afghan in the UK
>share a religion with racially and culturally inferior people has distanced me from Islam
you know you are inferior to whites right?

What is Afghan average IQ???

A proud 84

What's your point? That I can't be ethnocentric because there are ethnicities better than the one i belong to? I am proud of what I am and will always try to preserve it.

Quite low from what we can currently tell.

>0 evidence
Go back to /pol/, you'll feel more at home among your fellow brainlets.

>I am proud of what I am and will always try to preserve it.
People who think their race is what "they are" and are proud of this are usually the people who have no individual merits of themselves. This is why the canaille are usually the ones who embody this type of thinking, while high IQ people generally perceive themselves to be unique.

I don't know if it will be, getting in a LTR with a socially western yet culturally eastern gf worked out for me but I feel like with an Afghan girl, her being culturally and socially eastern would make you feel like you wouldn't be able to relate to her. just my 2 cents.

Also, for the longest time I've been in a cope state when it comes to biology and IQ (arguing that you can't know if intelligence can be measured, and if that measurement does exist, that you can't know whether the result is due to nature or nurture) but seeing someone so openly admit that whites have superior intelligence whilst maintaining pride makes me question my cope. Interesting stance.

This is one dimensional thinking. You can be unique and have your own goals and ambitions while preserving the entity that literally makes you who you are. Your ideal world might be a world in which everyone is some homogenised mutt race so the only distinguishing features are someones name and qualifications but that is a boring and bleak world. What do you think makes history so interesting? It is exactly that different types of peoples existed with different customs, religions, languages and accomplishments. Your mentality is that of someone whose completely removed from nature.

Genetics play a massive role in what someone like you assumes to be the expression of someone's individuality. Lets say hypothetically you replaced every Asian and every middle easterner and replaced them with Africans. Do you believe the kind of architecture expressed by the middle eastern people or Asian people can suddenly spring out of the mind of an African? No. What ever architecture is built (if any at all) will be a reflection of their genes.

In fact. You see this all over the world. Wherever Asian people have moved or lived the architecture they built tend to look the same and have similar style. Same for European countries (castles etc). Its because they are related genetically that such manifestations can be so similar yet be so far away from each other and have had no contact.
And this is true for many many other things.

WE

Relating to girls is not what you should even strive for. My current gf was completely different before she met compared to how she is now. God is the head of man, man is the head of woman. Whatever woman you marry should mould to your life and characteristics. This is how it is in our culture, and how it was in European culture before the men lost their testicles.

> but seeing someone so openly admit that whites have superior intelligence whilst maintaining pride makes me question my cope. Interesting stance.

It's interesting that you think it's strange or surprising to think how I do. It is very apparent the accomplishments of whites. You only have to look at the things you use every day (car, electricity, internet, household appliances, wearing suits or jeans, beautiful architecture). Admitting the accomplishments of others does not take away from your own pride or honour, only niggers think this way. We Afghans have great accomplishments too, the oldest civilisation was around the Indus river, where Pashtuns (ethnic Afghans) lived and still live. We have made some impressive palaces, minarets and mausoleum. There have many excavations of ancient jewellery and artefacts showing we did more than simply eat and live. Many of our other good qualities are related to our steadfastness such as making sure we're not ruled by foreign powers. You may also assign the first monotheistic religion (Zoroastrianism) and religious text (the Avesta) to a people we were very much a part of. The closest language to the language used in the Avesta (Zend) is Pashto. Where we lack in some things we make up in others.

Culture (and architecture!) has changed drastically with time, yet biology has stayed virtually the same. How do you explain that? And it's not a little change; white people in antiquity were basically savages not much different to the Native American tribes in the 1400s. And if antiquity is too long ago for you, the cultures of the classical and medieval eras were also incredibly different from the white culture of today. Hell, the 1950s, 70 years ago, was an ENTIRELY separate culture to the one of today. I think an environmental explanation is much more pertinent here.

Also, look up pictures of Dubai and of New York. They look virtually the same.

Taleb is based and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fraud

The cyclical nature of civilisation shows only that environment and governance can suppress people from using their full intellectual capacity. History shows Europeans were savages at some points, civilised and then a repeat. It also shows that Negroes were never an accomplished people. Environment plays a role in so far that it can elevate the best of your people. 500 years under dogmatic Christianity caused Germans to stagnate and fall under a state of ignorance. 12 years under National Socialism caused those same Germans to excel the most that mankind has ever excelled.

With regards to Dubai: Semites have always been a people able to maintain civilisation and now due to their wealth they are able to hire western architects and construction management. The architect of the Burj Khalifa is a white American, many of their other buildings were designed and/or developed by western companies.

I see it as surprising I guess because I'm Afghan and young, meaning my pride doesn't allow me to let myself face the truth that you just made clear to me. Thank you for elaborating bro.
I'm not too religious myself in that I don't have a relationship to God but I hope that changes as I learn more about Islam and become a calmer person because right now I'm "entrenched in logic"

Also thank you for educating me on my own country, gives me a point of reference as I go and lern more

We have great poets too. Rumi was born in modern day Afg. And Khusal Khan is great if you want to ignite your ethnic spirit:

The knowing, the perceptive man
is he who knows about himself,
for in self-knowledge and insight
lays knowledge of the holiest.

If in his heart there is no fear,
his deeds are not those of the good,
pay no heed to one who's skilled
in quoting the Quran by heart.

And:

When the swords of Afghans glitter,
The caravan and its merchandise shiver.
The camels moan and the riders groan,
As they near Khybar with their spirits blown.
Caravans and merchants whine and weep,
When onto the Pass mighty Pashtuns leap.
If a Pashtun extracts no tolls from a trader,
His tribe considers him a sellout traitor.
The Arab boys and the Farang women,
Crave the strength of Pashtun men.
From Hindustan to the distant west,
Afghans have put all to this test.
O son one word I have for thee,
Fear no one and no one you flee.
Pull out your sword and slay any one,
That says Pashtun and Afghan are not one.
Arabs know this and so do Romans,
Afghans are Pashtuns, Pashtuns are Afghans.

>Tah-leb
Is it not Tay-leb?

gf got me a Rumi book last week after we spent time in a cafe/bookshop reading his poems, was great.
Btw how old are you? I'm 18.
Do you know where I can meet other Afghans?

I'm 23. I wouldn't know where to meet them, especially not in Leeds. I have the same problem, can't even speak my language properly cus I only speak pashto to my parents. If you lived in London we could have hung out.

So your main point is that culture and system of values are connected to genes/race? The theory the Nazis propagated?
Well, the best argument I can give against that is that there hasn't been found a gene that would really be connected with anything like that. You can go ahead and find one and receive the nobel prize for it. There is no gene for disloyalty or greediness if we were to go against Jews. Sure, there are some genetic factors for aggressiveness but that is not a complex human behavior and could never be the only cause for the blacks to commit crime. Most CEO's are very aggressive people but they don't commit petty crimes.
And were Europeans always with the values they have today? Would a German from 300 A.D. have the same ideals as someone from 1100 A.D.? How come our society changes if we are linked to our race? Society changes but they race doesn't? what's up with that? And don't tell me there are some "core values" that never change and are linked to race. The Huns were literally the niggers of their age and don't fucking tell they're not white because they're probably more white than you, 56%
And why is Africa such a shithole you ask? Tell me why South America is such a shithole, India, Indonesia... Together, these regions have all the races of the world and yet they're complete shit because the place is shit, and blacks had their own communities only in shitland that is Africa, giving them no opportunity to grow a great empire even if they had more time than us.

so we wuz kangs and shiet?

well duh of course culture and values are an extension of genetics and races. where else would they come from? they dont just fall from the sky, they are man made user. And your "argument" that there hasnt been a specific gene found for that is absolute weak sauce, Im sure you will recognize that yourself.
your other tired shit about "muh environment"... I mean come on dude. Africa is one of the most ressource rich continents on the planet and countries under white rule did extremely well, only to fall back into complete chaos once whitey left it to the blacks again. this is a really boring discussion and I never even wanted to get into this, I just wanted to attack ntaleb for being an intellectually dishonest faggot. we might as well have talked about the epstein "suicide" which was another point I brought up originally, but of course everyone jumped on the race thing again. arguing with people who seriously believe there are no inherent differences between races and racial performance is simply based on nebulous "environments" or "white oppression" is just really boring. might as well be arguing that the sky is green.

we need /iq/ containment board

>12 years under National Socialism caused those same Germans to excel the most that mankind has ever excelled.
So a warmongering culture that could only sustain itself by stealing from other was the best the german ever did? Hell, if Germany wasn't so powerful and already recovering BEFORE Hitler took over, nazis would just have ended as another joke like Mussolini or Franco.

Attached: NS.jpg (782x1073, 270K)

>thinks intelligence is entirely quantifiable
data cuck

>Africa, where blacks were never colonized
The absolute state of IQ fags

>muh pol propaganda

The debt was taken care of by the previous """degenerate""" leaders, the german took moneys from american bank and repayed uk and france with those. Then the allies repayed their US war debt with that. The US realized that germany would never be able to repay all the debt it took and that it would fuck over US banks so they started reducing germany's repayement debt in exchange of reducing the allies war debt. Then the first inter war economic crisis hit and germany defaulted on its debt. And no one cpuld say anything because everyone was defaulting left and right.

Hitler had litteraly nothing to do with this. Same thing for the new nazi currency. The UK was the first to move away from the gold and was then followed by France years later.

I'm not even going to bother reading the rest, it's just unsourced allegations and blatant lies.

Why would you post something like that? Explain yourself.

>poor us, we invaded poland and Russia and ruined Italy and committed a genocide so we got our asses kicked, must have been the Jews!

That's not even the same argument you fucking retard.

>using twin studies to assert heritability of traits
Haha yikes

You are fully immersed into the veil of anti-hitlerism. I posted that because it's all true. Things improved before Hitler only because Germany hit the absolute low point. It could not have gone worse. Economic growth does not mean the economy is doing good, it only means it is doing better than before.Hitler though made Germany prosperous again.

> Same thing for the new nazi currency. The UK was the first to move away from the gold and was then followed by France years later.
The German currency became backed by labour, the British pound became backed by so-called "trust"

Germany did not commit any genocides. Poland was not invaded, rightful German clay that was occupied by Poland was retaken after the Poles oppressed the native Germans living there.

> ruined Italy
What are you talking about

So the best method? What are you some kind of retard?

Attached: MalcolmXOnJews.png (720x563, 282K)

>it's all true
Then you don't mind proving at least a couple of those allegations? Or maybe explain the discrepancies I pointed out?

>muh labor backed currency
I've met with this meme severals time and I still don't get it. What does it actually mean? It certainly didn't prevent hyperinflation as this is what ultimately happened because the governement kept pulling reichsmark out of his ass to pay the various military projects and a few failed welfare program. The peasants, who were already at the bottom of the society and a large part of germany population became even poorer as the salary of the workers grew and grew. Hell even the steel rations tickets that aimed at directing the limited steel toward importants industries ended up worthless as everyone and their mother had thousands of them.

>rightful German clay that was occupied by Poland
Germany rightfully lost it though.

I think the real problem is that a lot of people who obsess over IQ are secretly insecure in their own intelligence. The truth is there's nothing wrong with being a retard, as long as you're happy in your own skin.

I M B E C I L E

You invade a sovereign territory and you get shit on, nothing to do with the fucking Jews. And yes, slaughtering 12 million people in death camps isn't a genocide is it? Let me guess you're a holocaust truther too.

Damn this afghan dude is based

Been a while since I read the medium post, but I remember his arguments being pretty weak.

For example he says the correlation between IQ and both SAT scores and income is weaker at the high end than the low end, so as your IQ goes up, the corresponding increase in your income or SAT score becomes smaller.. There are two problems with this. First, the correlation *still exists* at the higher end, merely becomes smaller. While the effect is definitely smaller for the SAT after a certain point, income still increases significantly. But the main problem with this point about weaker correlations the higher you go is it's not true about IQ's correlation with *other* measures, like ACT scores. Another counterexample might be say, the capacity to be an MIT professor, something only people with only pretty high IQ's would be capable of.

It was really strange that someone as uneducated as I am was able to see holes in what he was saying that someone as highly regarded as Taleb either couldn't or wouldn't.

not him but,
>History of the Nations tome 4, it's in french though, not sure your nigger brain will get it.

based /pol/ poster.
read books by hjalmar schacht hjalmar schacht.
He LITERALLY invented a NEW monetary system and defeated the jewish speculators betting on germany's death. THE BOND.
>invaded poland.
Yeah it was german stolen territory you faggot.

>ass kicked.
>can't defeat peasant even if they wanted to.
try harder seething commie

Attached: parade 1939 poland.jpg (2907x1634, 1.07M)

>now it's 12millions.
sure faggot...the BIGGEST PROUESSE OF MORDERN TIMES.
trully amazing. ahhhhh zyklon b, top kek dumb commie.

You know that Schacht told Hitler to stop the rearmement or else face an hyperinflation, right? And then Hitler sacked him and guess what happened. Hell he wasn't even nazis

>He LITERALLY invented a NEW monetary system
What was it? The mefo bill that allowed tge governement to pull money out of its ass discretly? Or the weird token system destined to avpid bleeding moneys toward foreign countries?