Did 20th century existentialism and psychoanalysis have anything to say that these niggers didn't say first/better?

did 20th century existentialism and psychoanalysis have anything to say that these niggers didn't say first/better?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 109K)

Like what? You must have a lot of interesting, in-depth examples, being so familiar with them.

>including Dostoevsky
Sorry, what? Can you name one original idea he had? He was a basic bitch Christian.

>He was a basic bitch Christian
ladies and gentlemen... Yea Forums!

I'm not that user, but that's exactly what he was, retard.

replace Dostoyevsky with Schopenhauer

no
plebs

He doesn't. I'd be very surprised if he even has a wikipedia tier knowledge about these figures. All he knows is Yea Forums "memes". He's posting in the hopes that a knowledgeable user will come and spoil him like a child with an effortpost.
Everyone waits for the knowledgeable user to come and effortpost.
The knowledgeable user never comes.

t. idiot

I see you’ve a lot to say to the contrary, and for good reason. Shows me.

Attached: 1565028577485.gif (200x206, 1.44M)

>Posts meaningless nonsense, demands indepth response.

You were the first to porst nonsense, you absolute worthless trash. You will never post something in depth because you're a 90IQ midwit brainlet. Kys.

lol k

I'm not OP. I'm just pointing out that you're aggressively posting nothing and getting mad about it. I don't know enough about what you're argument is to formulate a response. Do you understand?

wow! just wow.

Well, the key notion of self-/psychoanalytic techniques is that you are utterly incapable in principle of imagining what you haven't lived. That is any single thing that goes through your mind, any fantasy, dream, whatever, is somehow combined of your recollections of SOMETHING you once went through, and that something can be subsequently elucidated. Course, then, there are literal schizos like Jung, but they are not at all what psychoanalysis started with (which was Anna O's story and later - and not entirely successful - Freud's interpretations of his dreams).

Well, for starters, he predicted you being an incel 175 years before now, faggot.

So, you know, according to psychoanalysis, good luck imagining just WHAT those niggers have said to begin with.

>you are utterly incapable in principle of imagining what you haven't lived
Well that just absolves me of all responsibility to ever touch their books then, if they're all grounded on such a ridiculous principle. It looks like someone completely misunderstood Plato's concept of recollection and turned it on its head so that instead of looking up to the eternal forms with which one is latently acquainted from the beginning, it has one looking always down to the temporal past.

Well... for one thing, I'm pretty sure Freud wrote a lot about psychosexual urges and the fluidity of sexuality and erogenous zones on the body, their impact on personality, etc. more than Nietzsche did. You know, that clinical stuff that helped his patients out. Read his case studies, you'll get all kinds of stuff that genuinely helped people but that none of the folks in pic wrote about.

It has nothing what so ever to do with Plato.

Also let me just say the person who invented the "talking cure" had apparently way more pressing concerns at the time, than trying to interpret Plato.

People really have the nerve to hate on dosto because he was christian, despicable honestly, zero faith, He achieve more that you can ever dream of, his writings on the human condition have inspired countless authors, your right, your words are meaningless, while his were prolific. its a shame honestly because you probably never have picked up one of his books besides notes.

then*