Who are the best public intellectuals and why?

Noam Chomsky - he's off a lot, but when he's on, he's great at analyzing why bad things are happening with war, economic exploitation, etc.

Roger Scruton - Bases his conservatism on aesthetic values, understanding that it's harder to build something beautiful than it is to destroy it. That's why it's important to maintain traditional values

Peter Singer - Probably the best living ecological ethicist

Naomi Wolf - This one's testy, but she's a liberal feminist who pushes for equality, individual dignity, writes about how to make social movements effective. Pushes for egalitarianism, rejecting radfems

Cal Newport - neuroscientist who explains from a cognitive/scientific basis how to be effective

First, I need to know what you mean by neoliberal.

If by neoliberalism you mean global free markets, people go in because of profits. They want to make money and be on the winning end, and worry if they don't become a neoliberal businessman, someone else will just take their place. Better to benefit from the system than get run over by it trying to stand in its way. They ignore that it's literally destroying the planet, and humanity with it.

However, a lot of people misuse the term to mean mainstream liberalism. The problem with mainstream liberalism is that they're useful idiots and apologists of the elites, and they facilitate social decay by promoting, or being "cool with" destructive behaviors like drug abuse, abusive relationships/sexuality, etc. You don't have to be a fucking fascist to oppose that. Just figure out what your values are, and then become a strong conservative, individualist, green, socialist, anarchist/unionist, pragmatist, or whatever. Hell, if you realize you really are a weak centre-leftist, you can advocate for that as a strong social democrat. Becoming a fascist just means giving up complete power to another corrupt elite.

yes massive afro and bulging mouth how handsome

I follow the work of
Steven Pinker
Sam Harris
Noam Chomksy
Jordan Peterson
Yuval Noah Harari
Lawrence Krauss
Paul Bloom
Richard Dawkins
Peter Singer
They all tend to (or at least attempt to) derive their beliefs from rationalism and empiricism (with Peterson perhaps being the exception due to his faith) and have backgrounds in science or philosophy.

Hardly. Post pics of yourself so we can compare.

nice bait

too obvious mate, you're not funny

I'm not being ironic. Why is this so triggering to you?

People on both the far right and the far left have pretty much figured out that if they expose their beliefs people won't take them seriously, so when people post stuff they disagree with, they just passive-aggressively insult and deride them to try and plant doubt and troll. Just ignore them.

E Michael Jones

Attached: E-Michael-Jones (1).jpg (264x420, 37K)

Me. I'm the guy that always makes a really good argument in Yea Forums threads