Why be moral?

Why be moral?

Attached: Johan.jpg (450x450, 34K)

Don't

Because we live in a society

Can someone prove that morality exists?

Duty towards oneself and God.
Same with being logical or honest.
Humans don't like self deception, immorality is petty and deceptive.

It's evil to rape kids, it's good to overcome evil.
Hence good and evil exist.

Attached: slide_27(1).jpg (960x720, 88K)

Morality concerns what you should and shouldn't do. Some actions benefit us, and some don't. You should strive to benefit yourself. Therefore, morality is ultimately based on self benefit. It is objective in the sense that there exists an action that will benefit us the most, but we might not always know what the right action is in any situation. We know some basics, such as that we shouldn't go around killing people, because that would lead to our harm.

Slave morality.

So we do it for God's grace, and ultimately, our self benefit

Based

Attached: 110d2e693c9d0a0c86bde5e62fefbea9_XL.jpg (900x1067, 268K)

The peak of European power and dominance over the planet was in the middle of the 19th century. The recession from this peak was due to internal -rather than external- forces, although I'd submit that these were not inevitable. This period saw the rise of social organizations which -satisfied with conquering the planet- saw the next project to perfect the morality of their nations, eventually leading to civil rights and independence movements.

The mistaken ideal of moral perfection has led to multiculturalism and massive economic opportunity loses: the slippery slope has proven all too real as voting rights have led to a creep towards all manner of dubious rights (E.G. being called by a preferred pronoun.) From a cultural perspective, not every country is equal, and technological advances allowed Europe to dominate the world, before morality encouraged to give up their holdings.

A central dogma of Conservatism is that society and the individual should be moral, but the most dominant empires at their peak, throughout history were far from moral... and it is this contradiction which I consider to be the blindspot which will doom efforts towards the preservation of White European culture. Society doesn't fall apart because it lacks a defined morality, but because it dogmatically clings to ideals which no longer apply to its current situation.

The argument against a White identity is political correctness, although this is not politically motivated, at all, but moral. The solution to this isn't liberalism, conservatism or libertarianism, but in a pragmatic version of libertinism (De Sade failed to resolve the contradiction where the goals of numerous libertines would clash- there have to be winners and losers.)