What literature fully explains the misguided detached violence like in pic related? Racial differences aside for now

what do you guys think joy lane is doing right now?

that's not ironic at all, the slaves sent back were not the same as the Liberian natives. different cultures, and of course they set up plantation style slavery, with no small aid and economic encouragement from Americans.
Liberia is an excellent example of how racial categories are entirely political and how there is no deep solidarity between different cultures of the same ethnicity, let alone cultures/ethnicities united by the absurd taxonomy that is racialism

Attached: 11743734-1084574251156722.jpg (1600x1600, 156K)

Why do ethnically homogeneous countries like Korea and Ireland still manage to fall into chaos?

Lmao sure

Because that other user is only partially incorrect. The source of all strife is not multiculturalism, nor is multiculturalism inherently burdened by inevitable strife. In times of economic turmoil, it is often observed that peoples ally by race, and become less open to cooperating with others outside their own culture. In the cases of Ireland and Korea, as they compare Japan for example, is simply a difference in their cultures. The reality of rampant alcoholism in Ireland for much of the 20th century was very real, and created equally real stigmas against allowing them jobs abroad and burdened economic development at home. This was not an issue the Japanese had in this same period, and thus would be one of many reasons why they succeeded in ways that the Irish did not. A nation is not defined by its percentage of diversities, but by what values and behaviors those diversities bring. For example, certain cultures are more bent towards cultural openess, and some less so. More books are translated into Spanish in Spain alone annually than have been translated into the Arabic language in a span of a thousand years. Cultures do not all hold the same values, nor do they cooperate in the same ways.

The fuck does that have to do with "misguided detached violence like pic related"
That pic is from a guy that filmed himself shooting up a random old guy, said he was doing it to get back at his girlfriend, he just walked up to the guy and said something like "can you say [gf's name]? she is the reason you about to die".
They were all from the same race.

False.
Ethnically diverse cities that are prosperous have fewer violent altercations. Impoverished regions, city or rural, have these tensions.
Ethnicities are an issue, but a solvable one. The major cause of suffering is economic hardship. Poor education included.

>Racial differences aside
that shooter was black though

me neither fuck, somehow it feels worse than mass shootings because of how personal it was

Liberia aside, how do we explain the anti-social tendencies of any area that is majority black? Please don’t recite Guns, Germs, and Steel for god’s sake.

Lets be real, it’s only some ethnicities. The ones that majorly live in the south.

Ethnically diverse cities that are prosperous usually also have draconic laws to ensure stability, like Singapore.

anglo meddling

The problem with blacks is that they were only recently civilized. A civilized society acts as a selective breeder and culls the herd accordingly. Anti-social types will end up in jail or be executed and thus, the herd is shaped to be cooperative and social in accordance with the respective society's standards. This is how evolution has occurred in recent human history. Most black people (but not all) are guided entirely by emotions and lack reason or forward thinking. They have yet to develop the inner voice that restricts unwarranted emotional responses. It is for this reason why any predominantly black area seems to revert back to an anti-social state that reflects their inner nature.

Attached: hqdefault-2.jpg (480x360, 30K)

Unironically The Stranger.

youtu.be/SdbLqOXmJ04

A man shouldn’t live up to that age.

You should consider that conflict drove human expansion, therefore the closer you get to the origin point the more violent the people will be.

Sectarianism, scarcity mentality, overpopulation, history of repression/dehumanization.

Simply untrue. Violence has decreased drastically since the times of slavery. We are currently in an age where violence (in developed countries ofc) is at the lowest it's ever been. Of course I do not claim that this is because of multiculturalism, but this certainly disproves the idea that multiculturalism of itself creates violent societies.

Your comment about blacks going back to Africa is also insanely myopic. A destitute, illiterate, and uneducated population who had just been freed from slavery were supposed to... what?... start cutting down wood and building ships for themselves to go back to countries where they do not speak the language or know the land? Blaming Africans for "colonising America" is ridiculous. If you want to blame someone for the presence of blacks in America blame the slavers.

it's time we go back to censoring evil,violent & sexual media production for the children's sake & safety! Movies! Video Games! Music! It mostly promotes violence,immorality, drinking,drugs,crime & perversion! there's very little positive entertainment!

Attached: file.png (600x338, 173K)

FUCK YOU AMERICA
RIP OLD MAN :(

based and harampilled

it's modernity. America is an entirely artificial society, good for reproducing capital and concentrating great amounts of resources, but decidedly centripetal in terms of motion as far as humans are concerned.

He says in the video "I have a lot of pent up anger, I call you guys up and you just dismiss my frustrations as nothing". He mentions being with a woman but trails off, implying she's no more caring than his friends.

This is a man who went to school, went to work, did what society told him to do. But in the end he still felt lost. His choice of target says a lot. His emotions have been bottled up so long the only release is explosive, they've festered into a vague anger at reality itself. He wants to let it all out, he wants to do something that'll finally make people sit up and listen to him. If you were being kind you could theorise he picked an old man because he'd be dead soon anyway, and it's easier for a man to kill a man as opposed to a woman or child. If you were being cynical you could say he sees his father stood before him. Either way it's about revenge. Revenge on society, revenge on the woman who didn't listen who now has to live with that man's death on her conscience, revenge on a life of disappointment and lies. Why not kill the woman? Many reasons, we'll never know which exactly. It's harder to kill someone you know than a stranger, part of him probably still loves her, part of him probably wants her to bear witness and suffer as he has. This wasn't an act of random, motiveless violence. This was a sad little whimper for help from a man who just couldn't take life any more.

Attached: leonstansfieldvader.jpg (670x268, 135K)

>blaming america
nigger please go travel to central/south america or anywhere in africa, india, or the near or central east, and come back and talk to me again about how bad america is you retarded ivory tower pussyfooted retard bubble boy. let me guess, when you go on your virtue signal vacation to haiti, you don't leave the tourist area, amiright?

faggot.

>Liberia aside, how do we explain the anti-social tendencies of any area that is majority black? Please don’t recite Guns, Germs, and Steel for god’s sake.
why would you mention guns germs and steel? the only reason I can think of is the recent thread is salient in your mind. I ignored that thread, it didn't have a chance to produce earnest discourse as it began with the typical racebait milieu. same with the post I am responding to. I completely reject your premise.

> anti-social tendencies of any area that is majority black?
what are those exactly? surely you don't mean to say that thievery and gang violence are the product of antisocial tendencies. sure they may accommodate antisocial tendencies to some degree, but no more than they punish them and provide a substrate for pro sociality. gangs for one are completely dependent on the community and absolutely punish antisocial behavior such as betrayal through snitching and greed. if you are trying to shoehorn in a kind of universal moralism into the rule of law, stop. i don't see how poor people stealing from well to do outsiders is bad, while at the same time it is seen as acceptable for rich people to give out loans at interest to the poor. in my opinion the later is far more sordid and antisocial. and how is gang violence any more antisocial than war? especially when the gang members put their own lives on the line instead of giving approval to send others out to die out for the purposes of utilitarian greed.
there is much to be said about, history, economics, politics and culture, but you are a racist knave and i see no chance of having an earnest conversation with the likes of you.
just know, the reason why your arguments and worldview go unchecked is because they are vile, don't take it as a sign of correctness or understanding
dumbass

>murder/violence didn't exist before modernity

no no you don't understand, that's what his college professor told him to think!

nevermind 10,000 years of recorded history the globe over.

the point of this kind of violence is to elude explanation

Did he actually kill anybody else? I vaguely remember him bragging that he killed 10 others but the old black man the only one I remember

Attached: xrkl6qxyj3sy.jpg (505x462, 86K)

that one is really fucking shocking, way more shocking than christchurch, for example, or other shootings you see on the internet, because of how personal it was. but anyway, there isn't anything deep in that murder in particular. the man was mentally ill. just chemical imbalances and brain damage like you see in other mental illness (depressed people for example, have less grey matter in certain parts of the brain because of the stress of the illness).

It is evident you have never lived in a majority black neighborhood. Anti-social behaviors are actions that harm or lack consideration for the well-being of others. While majority black people are able to maintain loyalty to a pack, gang, block, or any other small group, they are anti-social towards people who fall outside said group. It seems as if they are unable to empathize with people outside of their particular group which is why they tend to be anti-social.

Here is a fun experiment for you. Google "top rap songs 2019" or something of the sort. I want you to read the lyrics. I want you to observe just how sadistic many of these lyrics are. This is another example of anti-social tendencies inherent in (most) black people.

>but you are a racist knave and i see no chance of having an earnest conversation with the likes of you. just know, the reason why your arguments and worldview go unchecked is because they are vile, don't take it as a sign of correctness or understanding
The only reason why we cannot have an earnest conversation is because you are too emotionally attached to this topic and will revert to calling me a racist (typical NPC behavior). What exactly have I said that is racist? What, specifically, have I said that is vile? I have no vice against black people, just as I have no vice against tigers. The difference is, we are not trying to make tigers live up to the same societal standards that people from historically civilized societies live up to. "The Truth Will Set You Free, But First It Will Piss You Off." You should also bear in mind that I have lived in a majority black city for a large portion of my life.

>but anyway, there isn't anything deep in that murder in particular. the man was mentally ill. just chemical imbalances and brain damage

Attached: Unabomber_T_Kaczynski.jpg (200x253, 17K)

you are a blockhead, and i see no reason to argue from your inane terms. you can keep your pathetic, stereotypical red herring about my lived experience to yourself, dumbass. you use the same red herring that every racist on the internet always uses, and expect me not to immediately connect the dots? you aren't good at hiding your power level, weakling. that concept of 'antisocial behavior' does not hold water, explaining why is not worth the headache. most black people do not like gangs, and only the destitute join them. a much higher proportion of the general population supports war than blacks who support gangs, so if you would return to the 'war' counter that you conveniently ignored. so black people do antisocial things? how do this make them any different? are you going to post that crime stat infograph about how we have a 'nigger problem' next? it seems? not to me, and many other people, especially those that know a thing or two, it does not. you seem like a moron and a racist.

rap lyrics are nasty? are you going to continue to tell me about how rock and roll is a satanic plot? its music, and commercialized music. btw i listen to hip hop you tard
.
im not emotionally attached to this topic, i do feel disdain for your pathetic understanding. so you are going to call me an npc(typical autright behavior) you haven't said anything directly racist, but that's why i called you a knave. i wish you would cut to the chase and call me a nigger or a tranny. if somehow you aren't a racist, as literally all of your talking points and mannerisms betray you to be, then you were dumb enough to fall for /pol/'s rhetoric as an outsider, which makes you even more of a idiot than i take you for. you lived with black people, whatya want a cookie? plenty of people live in forests their entire lives and die with no understanding of how the trees live.
i refuse to argue on your terms and be sucked into the same, boring, useless conversation that has been happening on this website for years. die.

classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.5.five.html

"Another cause of revolution is difference of races which do not at once acquire a common spirit; for a state is not the growth of a day, any more than it grows out of a multitude brought together by accident. Hence the reception of strangers in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution; for example, the Achaeans who joined the Troezenians in the foundation of Sybaris, becoming later the more numerous, expelled them; hence the curse fell upon Sybaris. At Thurii the Sybarites quarrelled with their fellow-colonists; thinking that the land belonged to them, they wanted too much of it and were driven out. At Byzantium the new colonists were detected in a conspiracy, and were expelled by force of arms; the people of Antissa, who had received the Chian exiles, fought with them, and drove them out; and the Zancleans, after having received the Samians, were driven by them out of their own city. The citizens of Apollonia on the Euxine, after the introduction of a fresh body of colonists, had a revolution; the Syracusans, after the expulsion of their tyrants, having admitted strangers and mercenaries to the rights of citizenship, quarrelled and came to blows; the people of Amphipolis, having received Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by them. "

No Philia can develop between groups so different as whites and blacks.

>not emotionally attached to topic
>every post laden with name calling and logical fallacies

I've made my points and now I'll let them fester. Either you will continue to live in an epistemological bubble, or you finally adopt reality. Sometimes reality is unpleasant, its just something you have to learn to deal with. Once you move out of your mom's house, you should try and do some traveling. It might be good for you!

Attached: Victory-is-mine.png (340x256, 107K)

American psycho

black guy shooting another black guy? wow

Attached: 1565646579254.jpg (902x201, 48K)

Maybe I am experiencing a lot of empathy right now but damn, this image really, truly fucks me up. I don't have any background on what's actually happened here, but I feel for this man, I can grasp a fleeting bit of the depths of his terror. Skimming the thread just tells me that this man was a murder victim, which just fucks me up more desu. F

Attached: 562321295841165332.png (128x128, 21K)

You can watch him get murdered here
heavy.com/news/2017/04/stevie-steve-stephens-cleveland-facebook-live-shooting-full-video-unedited-watch/

me being emotionally attached to the topic, is yet another red herring, which is a fallacy .you've made your points, and i think you are an idiot, i want to make this abundantly clear.
im happy to see you mention epistemology and reality. which is something im actually interested in, unlike my public service drudgery(calling racist people morons)
so now that we've made our peace, lets get the ball rolling on to the real question.
do you think the given is real?

The worst part is how he puts his hands up to hide behind when the gun comes out.

This just made me hate him more.