Women dont care about philosophy

It's not like you really care about philosophy yourself.

just tell them some Sartre or some shit

Ah yes another thread where guys who never talk to women use facts and logic to explain women

I don't know, user, I have 2 female friends and I can hold a philosophical conversation with one and at the very least have a meaningful conversation with the other, same with my gf. Maybe you should consider what kind of women you attract and whether it's your fault.

Can you have a philosophical discussion though

What is this meme?

All I do care about is philosophy, rationalism and knowledge.

>All I do care about is philosophy, rationalism and knowledge.
and with a wicked sense of humour

Attached: 281737610.jpg (250x187, 8K)

my girlfriend does and reads more than i do. i compensate for being a philosopher myself

If they agree with you and you're telling them how it is there is no discussion.
Try discussing with a woman who hold the opposite view you have and they value showing off their opinion.
For example discussing feminism if you are a fascist and they a feminist or discussing economy if you are a l
Libertarian and they are Marxist.

>tfw didn't fall for the cringe philosophy meme

Attached: 1517784971835.png (645x773, 10K)

...

>We live in a fantasy world

not the same poster, but I've literally never met a woman with any interesting interest. I've met many guys with amazing interest though.

they are hard to find yes but they exist and often have personality disorders. its the price they have to pay for not being an NPC

>If they agree with you and you're telling them how it is there is no discussion.
When did he say this?

You draw universal conclusions based off of subjective experience?

There are women who care about philosophy, but I'm pretty sure they don't care about having philosophical dialogues with a /r9k/ loser like yourself.

Maybe I was not clear, I was intending to ask if this was the case. It has been my experience and I was wondering if this was the case for him too.
I do, by the way, know neither mine nor his personal experience is evidence for anything.

i did actually meet a chick i could talk about philosophy with, she was a canadian studying two grades above what's normal for her age. also she was not ugly
they're extremely rare user but they do exist

Attached: sleeping anime girl.png (499x343, 344K)

>should i just turn gay?
Begin with the Greeks.

>either a midwit or never had a meaningful relationship with a woman

>still no evidence
Cringe, why make claims like this if you have nothing to back them up?

Women aren't really for having deep abstract conversations with, they're more about looking beautiful and doing cute stuff.
There is a reason that they put so much effort into their appearance than into things like politics and philosophy like men do

How would you suggest I back them up?
Should I ask the faculty full of Marxists, postmodernism and feminists the following:
"Yes, I'd like to study how emotiond negatively effect rational decision making in women versus men."

Such studies are not done.

Good luck finding a man who cares either.

If such studies are not done, is your entire view based off of subjective experience? Why would you make a universal claim if you have no evidence to support it?

>thought provoking dialogues
you have those with friends.

women are on a lower frequency, so you simply have to pretend to be interested when she talks about the latest QVC gadget or food fad.

that's just how it is.

I see it as my moral duty to claim it is the case until the Postmodernists and Marxists hand is forced and studies will be done. I judge it highly immoral to surpress knowledge for ideological gain

Your entire view is thereby based on subjective experience, which makes you no less right. Kill yourself midwit

>Source. I need a source.

Attached: 1565461667093.jpg (825x635, 64K)

>Unicorns exist because the postmodernists haven't done a study to prove otherwise
>Women all hate chocolate because the postmodernists haven't done a study to prove otherwise
>Women are motivated strictly by buying more makeup until the marxists have proven it otherwise

>friends
Such a misnomer these days. Most friends aren’t interested in discussing anything outside of their provided reality,
much like females. Provided also the fact that woke sodomy has essentially destroyed most forms of male-male binding, and most times you’re left with the most superficial, low value relationships most women have with other women.

>p-please stop asking me to back up my claims with evidence! You're just supposed to blindly agree with me!!
This is how you guys sound.

>Unicorns
Exceptions to the rule do not overrule the rule

You are either too stupid to stay at Yea Forums or you are too angry to think, either way you don't deserve any more of my time.

>woke sodomy has essentially destroyed most forms of male-male binding
That's unfortunately true, I wouldn't say it destroyed, but it made them mode difficult.

Completely unrelated

My ex cared and had good conversations.
Too bad shes now married with a baby haha!

>still no evidence
Based

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

here you go

Attached: 0CE99BC6-76A4-4B14-ABC6-03591225DEF2.jpg (602x863, 118K)

Here's the answer: Wait for VR AI Wiafus

lol?

Attached: boys.png (604x862, 603K)

>thinking about naked kids while showering
probably why you can't get along with women desu

Kek

I recently ass fucked a late 20's asian tranny in their ass and it was gross, I dont wanna even think about fucking another man

so women lack empathy and don't even think about men? and men always think about women, within the greater context of realizing women are uncaring and can never give love but only receive.

seems biologically compatible, women are cum holes after all.

We’re like an ant colony with specialist types. Many of us care for the young, tons of empathy, we know what love and emotions are for, some are more suited to deep subject matter, we know what’s going on.

Attached: 68DA6D2E-3F9A-46A5-BAF4-4C5728E3643E.jpg (1613x2559, 749K)

You, on the other hand, are obsessed with your semen

Girls don't poop. I know from experience because I've never seen a girl poop. Plus they all smell good and that is not how poop smells which confirms my hypothesis.

>>women dont care about philosophy
>>you will never date someone and have thought provoking dialogues with them
>s
retarded

i find women more receptive to philosophical thinking than most men. i'm not sure that's a bad thing either.

This guy sciences

>should i just turn gay?
absolutely user.
w*men are trash.
i took gaypill while being blackpilled and i don't regret this decision

You’re not a woman, you wish. You’re a troll

You might have an embarrassingly narrow and loose idea of philosophy anyway

How many men care about philosophy?

There's no such thing as "exceptions" to a rule. If there are exceptions, there's no rule.

bad definition of a rule. you are being difficult on purpose.

I have those kinds of conversations with my gf all the time. If you want an cute and intellectual gf, then you’re more than welcome to find one. It’s pitiful and grating to head claims like “no woman cares about philosophy or meaningful conversations” when it’s clear that 1) plenty of them exist; and 2) most *men* don’t care about philosophy *either*. I would agree that more men than women care about philosophy, but when both percentages of each gender are in the single digits, what difference does it make?

Trust me, there are tons of women who are experiencing the same anti-modern, anti-degenerate, and intellectual ressentiment that many people on Yea Forums experience. And no, most of them did not ride “the cock carousel” past their expiration date—either they were wise enough to never get on it and stuck to meaningful long-term relationships (or saved themselves) or quickly got off of the hedonic treadmill when they sampled a taste and realized it was a spiritual dark hole.

You have to look for them in the right places. But if you guys are really who you say you are and aren’t total unwashed spergs, you should be able to find them.

a*
hear*

Fucking typos. Serves me right for phoneposting.

>being this much of a brainlet
Holy wow

You don't have to have thought provoking dialogues with them.

Women are obsessed with people. This is a fact. Men are obsessed with objects. This is a fact.

As charm is the sublime of cunning, comedy is the sublime of discourse. And since it takes more than a play to explain why that is, only a little more experience will do.

>tfw dating literal ivy league phd student women and they're braindead basic bitches

It doesn't

get

any better

Attached: 1565553566588.png (925x842, 654K)

Women DO care about philosophy
They ARE are easily overawed by philoso-babble
And WILL brand their pussy's with your initials
IF you're a philoso-chad who can speak confidently about ideas they can not comprehend and therefore can not falsify, ergo forcing themselves to capitulate to you
youtube.com/watch?v=vsxHKDgvhYY

Attached: philoso-wet.jpg (1280x720, 107K)

Women are sub-huMAN

Attached: Screenshot_20190624-005947_Samsung Internet.jpg (1080x1920, 1.11M)

>You have to look for them in the right places.
Where are the right places user? There are some in RW youth political parties, but most of the girls there are sluts who get off on power who get snapped up by politicians above you to become a mistress-staffer.

Attached: powerslut.jpg (936x622, 91K)

I can not fathom how much God must love you if you're asexual. I hate being attracted to women and I (don't hate; that word is too strong) despise women

Attached: 1561320449449.jpg (2732x5112, 3.24M)

>There are some in RW youth political parties, but most of the girls there are sluts who get off on power who get snapped up by politicians above you to become a mistress-staffer.
Trust me, you don’t want to date political bitches. Most of them are INSANE (and only in bad ways). Just find a girl with character who’s down to earth. If you’re looking for a place—imagine where your dream girl would spend her time.

Attached: E2596C12-00F7-4C0A-9772-A836A309328E.jpg (640x384, 52K)

Get a woman and love her, basically treat her as your child (expect it's ok to have sex with), I don't see why you would _need_ to be able to talk philosophy with her, you can have your bros for that.

Women can experience those things through a man. They need a male's beinghood to be fully human. Once they are a part of that husband-wife whole they can become human beings.

Lol you're not understanding what an rule is then

Fucking faggot women whore bitch nigger cumdumpster leave my board

Now tell me what a man can only experience through a woman that is of equal value as what women gain through men.

Spoiler: Nothing

>He saw she was touched by it
>"I've got this"
>immediately starts talking about how every man wishes to be loved, to find connection with another soul
Yea he's a chad.

Repeal the 19th and make wife-beating mandatory.

Beat your wives, daughters, and sisters. Oppress women.

Take the man-pill

Attached: IMG_20190608_225729_958.jpg (1080x1080, 181K)

My woman likes philosophy. It's hard to find a woman who's into it - much like it's hard to find a man who's into it.

Once you get to stoicism, you'll realise philosophy and other mental masturbation exercises are a waste of time.

>find a girl who understands hegel and deleuze better than me
>she is ugly and psychotic with a shitty personality

Attached: 1565034084886.png (680x680, 601K)

>Should I ask the faculty full of Marxists, postmodernism and feminists
Yikes.

Men don't like philosophy either. How many guys you know who've read the Greeks and are comfortable engaging in philosophical discourse?

Ask yourself why there is not a single female philosopher

Why would you need to talk to women to understand them?

Why do so many female thinkers talk about gender relations, dubious psychology and sexuality?
I highly doubt that every philosopher or intellectual had a problem with their mother.

Based

Actually based asf

>Now tell me what a man can only experience through a woman
Fatherhood, companionship, an estate-manager, a partisan. It will be inherently non-equal because men and women are totally different and therefore what each get out of eachother will be totally different and unique to eachother.

>Most of them are INSANE
True, but some are normal middle-class girls who get pushed into signing up by their right wing fathers who they obey.

Judith Butler

does this even mean anything

Attached: 1532020931173.png (512x512, 36K)

Define rational thought

>finally meet a girl I can discuss philosophy with
>she studies at the same uni as me
>wishmeluck.jpg
>ask her what she's interested in
>first book she mentions is The Second Sex
Just kill me already

Attached: noise.jpg (601x601, 37K)

>Jungian analysist
You see, as a man you are supposed to incarnate the solar/Apollonian principles of creative energy. If you are too intellectual and passive you are castrated by your mother.
Btw yes as a woman i should follow the Lunar energy and be passive, intuitive and emotional and thus not be writing books about psychological analysis but that's besides the point.

>TFW my fiancee and I just discussed how her recent dream was analogous to Plato's Cave

Too bad, you might have to step outside of your comfort zone to have a real discussion with her.

Attached: 1518445610207.jpg (750x750, 35K)

Based

Women aren't worth wasting a second of your life on.

Attached: 1542492088523.jpg (1892x1314, 432K)

It's the only male dominated(80% male) humanistic field in my university even though over half of the applicants are female

Karina Vold, Helen Hester, & Ophelia DeRoy are all currently living female philosophers, user.

Attached: VoldK.jpg (400x400, 93K)

>homosexuality is a sin
>Socrates and Plato loved young boys
Thinking

wrong

Lol

Attached: 20068866-F11A-4452-93C2-A9BF7897CE5F.jpg (651x1024, 59K)

>we know what’s going on.

If you did, most thinkers were females, but that's the opposite of reality.

>Men are obsessed with objects
No, they’re obsessed with ghosts of objects and people

Faulty reasoning
Existentialism doesn’t seem to bother us as much as men. I think it must be the childbearing and raising, we trust love and life.... but now male absolute rule as brought us to our extinction

Attached: CBDEB3C2-CCFE-402C-8DF6-FE0285D84C49.png (1131x1600, 2.89M)

>but now male absolute rule as brought us to our extinction
You are putting all blame on men, flawed reasoning, when in reality there are still women in high positions of power who are as cruel as men are and helped to bringing the "extinction" you talk about into manifestation.

Attached: masculinefeminine.jpg (1024x768, 242K)

They rule as men, as there is only that way to go about it. Anarchism is the feminine way. Direct democracy, smaller manageable groups. Computers to keep us connected

Leaving the evil systems of church, state, money, all your written word laws, to vanish back into thin air where they came from. That’s logical thinking, that’s your balance.

Attached: EB6E97C1-9343-4252-BEEA-B1E5AE687D72.jpg (572x831, 155K)

That's true. People have all sorts of life journeys. Honestly, don't jump to conclusions, and try to see with open eyes.

One of the most real women I've met in my life, I met through Tinder. Why was she there? Because she was people-watching, with no intentions of hooking up. Some women *say* they aren't interested in hookups because they're afraid of being judged. Others say that line because they want to at least get to know somebody and have them provide the veneer of care before having sex. But the rest? They genuinely don't find it pleasurable. Within about three days, we had shared all sorts of amazing conversations with each other and were ready to delete the app. I dated her for three months--eventually realized that we were incompatible long-term, which sucked because I felt that I had landed upon a treasure. But it was fun while it lasted and she brought me out of my comfort zone.

Moral of the story? You might find love in the least expected places. Are most people on Tinder going to be like that? Obviously not. But you could cross paths with all sorts of remarkable people, for all kinds of reasons, when you least expect it. That's just how life works, as it's a journey for everyone. Your odds only increase the more you play--keep your eyes open.

This is Wiccan-tier matriarchal farming society utopia nonsense. Pornocracy is the worst of all systems of rule and has been whenever it was implemented.

Pederasty is redpilled

>They rule as men
True but not because they are imitating the opposite Gender but because dominance and authority is a masculine trait. And everyone has masculine and feminine traits. Is an imbalance you see.

>Anarchism is the feminine way
Is for both genders, it's about achieving balance and discovering objective Morality exists.

Attached: quote-anarchism-to-me-means-not-only-the-denial-of-authority-not-only-a-new-economy-but-a-voltairine (850x400, 74K)

I reject your characterization of my brief sketch.
This isn’t matriarchy I propose. But if men can’t give up their ghosts for the real world, to hell with you all.

I’ve seen your ridiculous robo-wombs growing a cloned sheep.

I tried to imply all that, yes.

This.
Women are for sex and cooking, incel. If you're looking for a rationalisation mommy you're doing it wrong.

Patriarchy > Pornocracy.

That's even worse.

This a new r9k-ism?

>if you are a fascist
But user, I'm not retarded.

It hurts

Show me ONE (1) pornocracy that worked. Don't say Justinian.

this

Julius Caesar used be a ganymede

Simone de Beauvoir

well said kek

> can I get a source on that?
> I really need a Wikipedia article to use that phrase so I know it's legit.

think for yourself. this isn't a claim that you need special data to make an inference about

I know in theory it's possible. after all you can read women philosophers like Astell, and they are pretty good, but I've never met one in real life.

I think some have been close but they hide it because it's not socially attractive for women to talk about things like that.

I have also met legbeard PhD philosophers who are brain dead and just preach about muh oppression or tech ethics, or some bandwagon garbage.

>you guys are wrong, my fiancée saw Plato’s allegory of the cave in a comic once and knows about it

If women gave a damn about being attractive the majority of them wouldn’t be literally fat