Please suggest some works which will help me refute anti-natalism

Please suggest some works which will help me refute anti-natalism.

Attached: 1518447084195.png (1094x575, 93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

tridejur.uy/t123.php?id=4902641&alta=2015-02-25 19:35:13
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>needing a book to refute incel cope

Attached: 1564858057573.png (960x720, 542K)

You can never in one life time convince the world to stop reproducing.
So, Anti-natalists, in order to make sure their "wisdom" survives themselves, have to get a lot of children (since children is the most sustainable way of passing on ideology). Being an Anti-natalist is likely also heritable, thus if all Anti-natalists stopped having children Anti-natalists would die out and you following your own ethics doom the rest of the world to Natalism; we again end up with Anti-natalists being forced to reproduce several kids to increase the odds of your children being Anti-natalist themselves, but also for at least one of them to see that they need to personally reproduce so that their own children can teach anti-natalism like you and your children (and their children, and their children). You van't leave it to fate that Anti-natalism movement will survive your death.

There isn't retard, antinatalism is a well defended philosophical position. You can however take it to its logical conclusion, which would be the complete extermination of the human race, which puts antinatalists on a terrible spot, and essentially deny their worldview from ever being mainstream, or acceptable.

There isn't any. Anyone that puts any effort in trying to refute it is just coping.

>"become" biological loser

>subscribing to anti natalism isn't cope

One of Benatar's premises is that all suffering is bad and can be avoided by not being born. I agree, but anti-natalism does not solve that problem. If humanity ends, suffering itself does not end. To end all suffering all life must perish, for suffering is not confined to humans. Benatar even agrees that *all* sentient life suffers, but he dodges that hornets nest by limiting his case to human suffering. Benatar has yet to make a good argument for not embracing efilism.

Convincing losers to have a vasectomy is fun. You can't refute that.

>refute anti-natalism
Why would you stop losers from having a vasectomy? Are you serious? Why would you do that?

I used to promote antinatalism out of compassion, but I don't care anymore. I'm not antinatalist anymore but decide to remain childfree, and I no longer give a shit if your children suffer. It's not my problem. Don't make it my problem.

>I no longer give a shit if your children suffer. It's not my problem.
Me, my children and my grandchildren literally feed on losers like you. Your very existence is an everlasting source of happiness for us.

Your children will probably die from some kind of Civil War, disease, or so forth. Again it's not my problem, and I have no more compassion to share. Just leave me alone.

Or madman, it's possible. There are no guarantees in life. Now go eat shit. I have neither love nor malice in my heart for naive faggots like you. Just a desire for as much distance as possible.

Anti-natalism is only irrefutable in the case of niggers

>Your children will probably
LOL, I'll have grand-grandchildren in maybe a few years.
Let me tell you a truth: Every prosperous happy big family feed on lonely clueless losers like you. That's simply how life works. It's so much fun!

>There are no guarantees in life.
t. clueless childless loser
>Now go eat shit.
Happy prosperous families don't eat shit, that's not how life works.

Plenty of lineages have died. Yours will invariably end in the future too. It will all be for naught, and I don't give a shit. Not my problem, again.
>feed on lonely clueless losers like you
I'm not a sadist, so I won't respond with schadenfreude when your descendants ultimately die. They WILL die from something horrible. It's the way history works.

Prosperity is impermanent. It doesn't last forever. Your lineage will end somewhere down the line. It could happen sooner than expected or much later. Again, it's not my problem. I view it with indifference now.

>I'm not antinatalist anymore
But you had a vasectomy.
LOL

>Plenty of lineages have died.
Because we convinced them to die. So fun!
>Yours will
Nope, having fun an winning are forever.

What is Nietzsche doing there you absolute triple incel.

>having fun an winning are forever
You are a delusional piece of shit. People like you only wake up when reality smashes and dispels your naive delusions.
Nope. I'm married and made a conscious decision not to have kids. Now slit your throat.

Antinatalism is literally peak internalized liberalism. The concept of "consent" is reified into a metaphysics where you can justify as "evil" the creation of life because it wasn't "consented" to by the party involved.

Meanwhile in the real world, almost everything in human history of any value at all, or can be argued to be an authentic expression of human identity, has never been "voluntary" nor "consented to".

Antinatalism is literally the terminal expression of middle class malaise.

You should get into tridejur.uy and search about abortion, also China issues with natality like this:

#20190811 Review: In Mo Yan's "Frog," a Chinese Abortionist Embodies State Power - The New York Times
tridejur.uy/t123.php?id=4902641&alta=2015-02-25 19:35:13