Atheism being wrong doesn't necessarily mean that your religion is right

Atheism being wrong doesn't necessarily mean that your religion is right.
Nihilism being wrong doesn't necessarily mean that moral absolutism or positivism are right.
Idealism being wrong doesn't necessarily mean that eliminative materialism is right and dualism is wrong.
Post-modernism and epistemological anarquism being wrong doesn't necessarily mean that scientism is right.
Consequentialism being wrong doesn't necessarily mean that Virtue Ethics are right.

Why? Because a negative doesn't prove a positive.
Everyone is retarded but me, prove me wrong.
Protip: You can't. You fucking can't.
>pic related but unironically.

Attached: homer.jpg (800x450, 74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

philosophynow.org/issues/45/The_Last_Messiah
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Everyone being retarded odes not prove you are not retarded

Even if you could prove anything right or wrong, it only works in a small frame of reality, just like physics.

Did you think this was a revolutionary thought?

Heh ... I never really thought about it that way

Nihilism and atheism are correct, though.

Fpbp
/thread

>odes not

Pic related is you but unironically.

Attached: solipsismmark.png (611x466, 371K)

lol

Attached: nihilism.png (691x359, 25K)

Moralfags probably think things like this are clever, like when they "argue" against antinatalism by asking why the antinatalist has not committed suicide.

Aha, where do you live, I'll kill you and rape your mother and dad.
You don't care right? Good.

Attached: warmaker.jpg (940x692, 125K)

>Moralfags
Nihilism is literally a moral system.
You are a retard.

>when they "argue" against antinatalism by asking why the antinatalist has not committed suicide.
That's a perfectly valid argument against anti-natalism.
Though, anti-natalists are not nihilists, most of them are utilitarians, but utilitarians are equally as niggerish as nihilists.

I don't have any imperative to not care.
I'm sorry you don't understand what the word I used means.
It isn't. But go ahead thinking that it is. If you're stupid enough to think that it's valid then I doubt there's anything I can say that would move you.

The good version of the argument is not “why don’t you kill yourself,” but “are you part of the excess population?” The problem then becomes (a) why one should listen to the antinatalist if they are the cause of the problem they aim to solve, or (b) why we should listen to a blatant hypocrite.

Antinatalists are not Malthusians. Their problem is not "excess population".

>or (b) why we should listen to a blatant hypocrite.
Proof that you are a fool. You judge the worth of ideas by the person delivering them to you, rather than by their own merits.

>Antinatalists are not Malthusians
Wrong.
Replace food with Global Warming, you are malthusians.
Unironically kill yourself.
You are malthusians.
>I'm sorry you don't understand what the word I used means.
Found the hypocrite moralfag.
It is, you absolute retard.
>If you're stupid enough to think that it's valid
Are you so autistic that you don't understand the motivations that we normies have to hate hypocrites like you?
Unironically kill yourself.
Again, if you are an anti-natalist, you are not a nihilist, but you are just as stupid as them.

Just give me your address and IP. Less obfuscation, more action.

Attached: 1558454235091.jpg (750x750, 108K)

>Wrong.
>Replace food with Global Warming, you are malthusians.
You don't have the faintest idea about the position you're arguing against.

Based physical remover.
Bushido and warmongering Jingoism are the only valid ethical systems.

Attached: 1563646323233.png (800x515, 485K)

>namecalling and whataboutism
Are facts and logic a spook too?
I hope you fucking off yourself. You absolute retard. You are not only stupid, you are also evil, you are useless and despicable.

>click on a banner that takes me to this cool looking board about literature
>see only threads about religion
Why we gotta argue over imaginary friends (or if they are imaginary). There are a fuckton of good books to talk about.
I am currently in the middle of Journey to the West right now, but after Wukong’s story I am super bored.

You forgot the most important book user.

Attached: CorpusHermeticum.jpg (333x499, 46K)

I'm sorry but if you think antinatalism is about global warming or food shortages then you're simply wrong. Perhaps there are some people who advocate it due to these reasons for political purposes, but as a philosophical position it has different underpinnings. Throwing a tantrum like you're doing is expected though, as that is the usual response antinatalism provokes.

>Implying antinatalist aren't the greatest moralisers of all time

& Antinatalism being wrong doesn't necessarily mean that pronatalism is right.

It's very easy to make ad hominem arguments against a nihilist or antinatalist, it's hard to argue in favour of the countervailing position

maybe if you live a cushy life with no struggle

>God is real because I experienced hardship and needed emotional support
Lol.

so whats a viable alternative to what seems to be a working solution? if an asspull like that works then why shouldnt we believe in it?

I don't have a solution. I don't think there is one, just various coping methods. If God works for you, then feel free -- I don't think that it's wrong to believe in something like that, even if I don't think it's real. Personally I can't get much comfort from such a belief, because in the back of my head I know it's a sham.

Being wrong doesn't necessarily mean I'm not right

your post is full of things TOO OBVIOUS AND ELEMENTARY TO BE WORTH SAYING AT ALL

Okay but why hasn’t the antinatalist killed anyone or have plans to kill everyone? Bugs the shit out me of me, just step on more bugs or something.

Our understanding of physics being technically wrong doesn’t mean that buildings fall down.

if life is full of copes then what isnt a sham? I dont really know but id imagine if we were completely rational, the best solution to rid ourselves of pain would be suicide. Just what i think.

Try reading this essay by Zapffe. That's what it's about, the coping mechanisms we use to deal with the effects of consciousness:
philosophynow.org/issues/45/The_Last_Messiah
>When a human being takes his life in depression, this is a natural death of spiritual causes.

>Zappfe
I dont believe in that stuff