Is it even possible for a monoglot to be a great writer?

Is it even possible for a monoglot to be a great writer?

Attached: 50924499-dfe866ce8063ab41d1138a2553db4f4f1c940cf1-s800-c85.jpg (800x599, 68K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CDVD3YTRAV8
eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=2&sid=380bf47b-4f33-41e6-ba83-bdd7ad0251c5@sessionmgr102&bdata=Jmxhbmc9ZXMmc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ==#AN=edselc.2-52.0-84898475281&db=edselc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Shakespeare only knew English fluently

and obviously homer (if we take a broader meaning of 'writer') only knew greek

Probably a few bongoid ones

The idea that Shakespeare wouldn't have known Latin is preposterous

ben jonson said he knew small latin and less greek

He was Edward de Vere, who was a polyglot. Yes, he knew Latin.

There was not such thing as "Greek" or "Greeks" before Homer. The big thing about him is that he unified the, although really similar, different "Greek" cultures and dialects. There's a clear parallel between the Greeks unifying for war and Homer unifying dialects in his own brand of Greek language.

youtube.com/watch?v=CDVD3YTRAV8

He had to have at least known Latin also, and probably French to a degree.

I have looked into it slightly deeper than a scene from a Mark Wahlberg movie, thanks though.

I would say that he knew Spanish, given that he took inspiration in Quixote to write one of his plays, but he probably read a translation.

Actually I don't even get it. Why is calling him The Earle of Oxford or much less, Marlowe supposed to diminish his reputation? If he were Marlowe then he'd just be an even more prolific and greater writer, no?

Attached: raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_ca443f4786.jpg (360x360, 21K)

He wasn’t Marlowe, he was de Vere. And nobody is calling him that to diminish his reputation? It just gives more accurate insight to the genius behind the work, what sort of life experience he was drawing from. It doesn’t change anything about his work.

right thank you, i know. the point was he was a monoglot.
and obviously as the story shows the greeks weren't all that effective at unification and were generally proud about their lack of it

where are you getting that from?

see and he read the florio translation of montaigne so probably NOT french

Yeah, exactly. Greece, as a whole identity/idea, exist solely through Homer, in all other aspects they were apart.

would you come off it. he wasn't de vere

He definitely isn’t Marlowe, it’s complete insanity on the level of “Tupac is alive in the Bahamas” to suggest that. But he was probably de Vere—there are numerous distinctive parallels between de Vere’s life and the plays, for instance getting caught by pirates (Hamlet), and he was even punned at in court by someone in the know remarking “Thy countenance shakes spears”. There’s a whole plethora of such things that make a compelling case.

Alls I'm saying guys is what kind of Jealous action imputes more esteem upon the person being jellified?

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 3K)

eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=2&sid=380bf47b-4f33-41e6-ba83-bdd7ad0251c5@sessionmgr102&bdata=Jmxhbmc9ZXMmc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ==#AN=edselc.2-52.0-84898475281&db=edselc

There is a lot of debate around this topic. Probably, it will never be resolved. But it's a cool read.
Also, Roger Chartier's History of reading in the West is a great book.