Is knowledge justified true belief, Yea Forums?

Is knowledge justified true belief, Yea Forums?

Attached: apu.png (500x468, 80K)

Define knowledge.
And justified.
And true.
And belief.

It's a nice definition but I remember reading wiki once (not just now, really) and IIRC it cited some academic philosophy which identified another species of human thought which a) could legitimately be classified as "knowledge" and b) is something other than "justified true belief". I didn't look into it any further than that at the time. I will post this comment and maybe check on it afterwards.

Knowledge is what you learn through time by listening or by research
Justified is like a theorema with proof
True is something someone considers based on their knowledge or past events
Belief is something you cannot prove but you think is true

Define "Define"

Attached: 019357901351.jpg (430x363, 30K)

Define is to create knowledge from a perspective or point of view

Define "knowledge".

Define "is"

>Define knowledge.
You don't have to if you define the other three
>And justified.
Supported by evidence and argument
> true
In accordance with the facts
> belief
A mental state that represents an intention, attitude, or stance towards a state of affairs.

Therefore knowledge is an argument supported by evidence in accordance with the facts is a mental state that represents an intention, attitude, or stance towards a state of affairs.

Good job falling for bait

No, it's a genuine issue that philosophers debate. Whether knowledge is justified true belief. And in philosophy you must always define your terms.

knowledge is some "thing" that can be accounted for with certainty
justified is a rationale or reason given to make a case for said "thing"
truth shares a binary with falsehood, unlike knowledge which delineates some thing, and differentiates it from other things, truth is what determines said characteristics, and/or justification as being accurate/correct.
Belief is that which isn't fully known with certitude, but taken on faith as being such. The difference between a cartographer who mapped out all the streets on your city and has knowledge of the city, and your tourist guide, is that the tourist guide takes on faith that the cartographers delineation is correct.

Seething

cope harder you seething copecel.

>triggered

I'm sure they do. In fact, you should probably leave it to them.

something that is true by coincidence and justified by something that is not true would fall under that definition

about half of your confusion is assuming there is such a thing as knowledge and the rest is not understanding the idiocy of arguing about words

Attached: 1523245498573.jpg (326x244, 21K)

Knowledge is increasingly automated and worthless as such (google-fu). What you need is wisdom, that is, practical skill in applying knowledge in a wide range of situations.

I see you're contributing to the discussion.
Also you're talking to the greatest living philosopher. Show some respect.

In some ways yes, but in many others, no.
Hope that helps user.

you suck cocks

>>Define knowledge.
>You don't have to
wut?

>>And justified.
>Supported by evidence and argument
what is evidence and argument?

>> true
>In accordance with the facts
what are facts?

Jesus fuck that's terrible. A belief in this context is just a valid statement of fact in a language.

>what is evidence and argument?
Well you see each of these terms are interdefined. Evidence is that which supports an argument, verifiable information that points to the world being in a particular state. Evidence is public and open to inspection by the senses.

An argument is an assertion that the facts are what they are supported by reasoning. Without evidence there is no confidence they are tied to facts.

And before you ask, reasoning is the ability to trace cause and effect relationships and to draw inferences from premises to conclusions.

>what are facts?
Facts are the conditions of the world. They are descriptions of a particular configuration state the world has been, is, or will be in. Everything in the world happens one way and not another. The way it happens are the facts. Counterfactuals, in contrast, are ways the world could have happened.