What do you read to explain heterosexual attraction? Aren't women just a womb and something pretty to look at?

What do you think about the movie Blue is the warmest colour?

>They’re smart and have a lot of insight & more emotional maturity than almost all males.
Some but not all.

Pattern recognition is important to understand the world. And contrary to what you may believe, people aren't special unique snowflakes, you can classify them based on a number of criteria and peg them into neat little categories.
I haven't read Submission yet, these are my original thoughts after walking too many times to braphogs

Attached: fuck i want to cum in her ass.jpg (1024x689, 87K)

Women in general understand men better than they, generally, do themselves. Certain lesbians even more so.

A bisexuals film with a goofy hetero males ideal lesbian sex scene. Lovely cinematography, good acting, okay story, but it pulls punches. We’re just supposed to get a warm heart and stiff boner for the un-anchorable animalistic girl. What else?

Also, I think the writer was going for the main character from Rubyfruit Jungle. When do we see a film of that I wonder. Too spicy?

Yow

> Aren't women just a womb and something pretty to look at?
They can be much more when forced to by environment. Unfortunately the environment rarely forces em to, it happens only to very ugly women who never got any male attention who get over it and go on some path of self-realization, or in now somewhat exotic cultural matriarchies.

I'd say 3/4 of women get stuck as 12yos developmentally simply because most societies tend to infantilize women to that end (chivalry, whiteknightning, you know the drill).

>you can classify them based on a number of criteria and peg them into neat little categories
Categories and sets represent a purely mathematical outlook on the universe. Reducing it down to set logic is saying the human mind approaches truth as the categories approach infinite, meaning yes, every human is a special unique snowflake and the reduction to two categories is the second worst possible fit of all versions of the truth after reduction to one category.

Then please, do share your theory on heterosexual male attraction with us

Attached: 1550253007151.jpg (1080x1349, 1.49M)

is most of what there is to say about the matter. People who fall on either extreme need to learn from one another, while acknowledging a common goal of multifaceted personhood that can similarly encompass and learn from those who conform to a lesser degree.

There's an interesting dynamic in perception of categories between genders.

Men prefer generality and categories, so they say "all X are like that", with implicit assumption outliers exist, but are not statistically significant.
Meanwhile, when woman hears "some X are like that", she automatically assumes "all", bringing exaggerated significance to outliers and individuality.

I think this outlines a fundamental dimorphism between female/male brain. Women actively reject generalities, and instead prefer to look at each individual case, and if forced to generalize, sum up only the individual cases she personally knows. This cognitive approach is "safe bet", very accurate, but doesn't allow for projection of big picture.

Meanwhile, men do sweeping generalizations and speculation - sample few cases, and often extrapolate from sample points too few for the extrapolation to have any informational value. This is high risk/high reward play with incomplete information, as it has more predictive power, but can be very inaccurate.

Of course there's a middle ground: Entire field of statistics which tells you exactly how many sample you need and how to avoid biases.

>I'd say 3/4 of women get stuck as 12yos developmentally simply because most societies tend to infantilize women to that end (chivalry, whiteknightning, you know the drill).
I think this is a reasonable estimate. It happens to most males too, but society tends to attribute masculinity as more mature. Tough guys like younger Mike Tyson was very immature, and even now his mind festers in spiritualism

What does "immature" even mean? I'd consider having any reasonable life goal, that is, have some concrete point to walk towards as mature. Boxing can be mature - competetive endeavor like any. Being concerned about cunt, fading looks and desire to be pampered? That's a rather sad life goal when you think about it, yet a rather shocking amount of women are this vapid.