Objective philosopher rankings

well, Yea Forums? so who was right about everything?
tiermaker.com/create/philosophers-25438

Attached: 1562560243982.png (600x772, 311K)

>No Kornell West
>No Ted Kazinsky
DROPPED

Attached: Capture.png (1046x856, 737K)

way too many nobodys

Honestly, I realized I was the next big deal and am right about everything, so I just stopped reading philosophy altogether.

so much feminist garbage. why are you on this site OP?

i love this board

just so much

Where's Eliot Rodgers?

This but unironically

Throw that Jew down into the trash and I 100% unironically agree with that list.

He was a philosopher, but it is more apt to call him a philanthropist overall. The real shame is that Billy Herrington isn't on the list.

>no aristotle
>shitton of literally whos

Attached: my-image.png (1146x834, 942K)

>Kant and Hegel: great but derivative
>Kierkegaard and Heidegger: great and groundbreaking

nigger what?

you just posted cringe

sneed

Attached: phil+.png (1064x545, 509K)

Open wide for the ultimate redpill

der Ursprung des Denkens: Heraclitus -> Parmenides -> Socrates -> Aristophanes -> Plato -> Aristotle -> Cicero -> Hume -> Hamann -> Lessing -> Goethe -> Jacobi -> Niethammer -> Hölderlin -> Novalis -> Schlegel -> Kierkegaard -> Steiner -> Heidegger
die luziferische Versuchung der Verirrten: Pythagoras -> Plato -> Plotinus -> Augustine -> Aquinas -> Descartes -> Spinoza -> Leibniz -> Berkeley -> Kant -> Reinhold -> Fichte -> Schelling -> Hegel -> Stirner -> Schopenhauer -> Marx -> Freud -> Jung -> the fr*Nch

die tragische Inkarnation Ahrimans: Nietzsche

>Lessing
*Herder

ho dat bitch ppl put high up?

Attached: my-image.png (1064x1001, 1.28M)

Based

Attached: bassedo.jpg (450x466, 32K)

cringe

objective ranking here

Attached: my-image.png (1064x986, 945K)

>freud over kant
cringe

this but ironically

Respectable but mills should be great or at least good if Russell is good and Freud should be derivative at least

I debated putting Kant in red for like 5 minutes, but I settled on just Hegel.
Probably, I'm not obsessed with him but I can see his merits. And Freud is an amalgam with Lacan (I could place him, he'd be in the red w/ Freud one below).

they did zizek dirty on that site

based

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-08-08 at 1.51.38 AM.png (892x602, 479K)

t. expert couponer

I’d tell you to slowly rot in hell but it’s probably something you will enjoy anyways

*ahem* fuck hegel

Attached: my-image.png (1064x1113, 973K)

>land and deleuze on who

Attached: 1563430945612.jpg (1838x2297, 858K)

Attached: my-image.png (1064x467, 641K)

>muh accelerationism
cringe

An actual good tier list

Heidegger was a literal cuckold. His wife cheated on him and from another man bore her child Hermann, whom he fathered as his own.

sprech englisch butte

where the fuck is Witty?

Attached: my-image.png (879x1018, 935K)

Attached: my-image (1).png (1146x560, 475K)

>Descartes and Heidegger on the same tier
....based

>kierkesaan in god-tier
See you in four years, let me know who's king next season.

>schoppe in last
I can smell it

Christ is King, in all times and ages

Attached: serveimage-21 10.33.39 AM.jpg (640x340, 36K)

Right, that's why I said king. At least you got you season part right.

how can you at once hold Schopenhauer as garbage and Cioran as good?

Attached: raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_ca443f4786.jpg (360x360, 21K)

And what about Postmodernism? I'm sure you'll say that is just as obscure and worthy of being ignored.

Attached: 1565257015093.jpg (513x480, 22K)

Go away Justin

anybody who puts bentham anywhere under good doesnt understand bentham

Attached: my-image.png (1064x925, 938K)

It's okay user, we all had our heuristic phase.

>Marx in the same tier as Kant and Hegel
You just posted cringe.