When the cultural hegemony of the global bourgeoise birthed by the liberal project, gentrifies everything in its image and the economic hegemony of their momopolies, oligopolies, and international trade agreements folds every last market and commodity under their black, leathery wings, where is either the individual liberty or dynamic economy the liberal project promised its unipolar dominion would provide? If the answer to this question is that liberalism will merely actualize itself as yet another form of totalitarianism, why not conclude that totalitarianism is the logical outcome of all organizational experiments across each epoch of human civilization, even the one which claimed it would find a solution to this problem yet only created an even more painful form of it? And if we indeed accept this conclusion, why not proceed to build a unipolar world of totalitarian nation-states which, despite perhaps disagreeing on the cosmetic form (Soviet communism, fascism, monarchism or perhaps some synthesis of the three) of totalitarianism at least agree on its fundamental irrefurability as the true lesser evil of social arrangements and proceed to leave childish notions such as "individualism" and "personal freedom" behind?
tl dr didn't read your pseud shit user nice tits tho
Gabriel Long
I wasnt trying to be a pseudo intellectual i was just trying to ask questions which have been weighing on my mind in the most coherent way I could. The tldr is basically "If liberalism turns into totalitarianism anyway why not just allow states to go back to the 20th century totalitarianisms (and perhaps new ones synrhesized from the old) so long as they all agree to follow a non aggression principle"?
Adam Flores
WHY?! WHY MUST YOU TORMENT ME SO WITH THESE JEZEBELS? All I want to do is come here for an asexual experience that will exercise my brain but I am constantly titillated by these vixens with their prodigious hips and provocative figures. Can I never satiate this thirst, will I ever know the touch of a woman and enter between her loins? Will my seed ever drip from her moistened hole?
William White
Just jack off man
Luke Taylor
>Can I never satiate this thirst No >will I ever know the touch of a woman and enter between her loins? Yes >Will my seed ever drip from her moistened hole? God yes
>And if we indeed accept this conclusion, why not proceed to build a unipolar world of totalitarian nation-states We need not accept this in the least. It is still a goal to strive for to find the balance we lack in individualism/collectivism. Much the same way women have never truly wanted a tit-for-tat age of matriarchy, but the balance. Our strength and weakness. >still eating up those be pills
I love butterfaces. The kind of gal you want to have sex with with 2 brown paper bags or the lights off :)
Kayden Parker
How is a unipolarity of different totalitarianisms not a synthesis between "multiculturalism" and collectivism? There could even be zones of the planet where "anarchists" or whatever could live and if neoliberal capitalism wasn't the economic base of the entire planet we coukd manage to give them at least enough resources to live, If not in luxury, at least comfortably. They shouldn't be allowed to reproduce exponentially but neither should any population so it wouldn't really be an abrogation of human rights to institute a one child policy in those zones since a two child policy in the homeland (which could be adjusted depending on the pace of automation/how close to depopulation a nation was)
In this reality the UN would actually be a unity of autonomous nations collectively trying to preserve the human species against self-destruction rather than yet another global regulatory agency for the US and EU
