Based and redpilled opinions

>Balzac, Honoré de. Mediocre. Fakes realism with easy platitudes.
>Camus, Albert. Dislike him. Second-rate, ephemeral, puffed-up. A nonentity, means absolutely nothing to me. Awful.
>Céline, Louis-Ferdinand. Second-rate. A tense-looking but really very loose type of writing.
>Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Dislike him. A cheap sensationalist, clumsy and vulgar. A prophet, a claptrap journalist and a slapdash comedian. Some of his scenes are extraordinarily amusing. Nobody takes his reactionary journalism seriously. The Double. His best work, though an obvious and shameless imitation of Gogol's "Nose." The Brothers Karamazov. Dislike it intensely. Crime and Punishment. Dislike it intensely. Ghastly rigmarole.
>Eliot, T. S. Not quite first-rate.
>Freud, Sigmund. A figure of fun. Loathe him. Vile deceit. Freudian interpretation of dreams is charlatanic, and satanic, nonsense.
>James, Henry. Dislike him rather intensely, but now and then his wording causes a kind of electric tingle. Certainly not a genius.
>Lawrence, D. H. Second-rate, ephemeral, puffed-up. Mediocre. Fakes realism with easy platitudes. Execrable.
>Marx, Karl. Loathe him.
>Pound, Ezra. Definitely second-rate. A total fake. A venerable fraud.
>Sartre, Jean-Paul. Even more awful than Camus.

Attached: Vladimir_Nabokov_1969b.jpg (260x410, 40K)

Nabokov liked niggers and butterflies. He was a delusional autist and bluepilled as fuck.

cope

it's true, though. why would I cope?

cope

Cope for what? I like his work. His love of niggers (particularly African Americans) and butterflies is disturbing to say the least, though.

cope

he was cunnypilled so all is forgiven

this thread AGAIN

Attached: 1489197185302.jpg (392x250, 38K)

cringe

cringe

cope

>Eliot, T. S. Not quite first-rate.
Pretty rich coming from a literal failed poet like Nabokov.

yikes

cope

>my opinions are objective facts that I can just assert without any attempt at defense.
>I am the savior of the canon

you fucking lose faggot

Attached: 1564631380826.png (843x903, 39K)

cope

All obviously very based.

>complaining about anything being satanic while on Yea Forums

Attached: 4GcvLc9.jpg (700x525, 231K)

>he can't Yea Forums
inb4 cope. we heard you alright plebbitor.
giga cope.

cope

have sex

WAIT A FUCKING SECOND

IS IT...SATAN?!

Attached: HOLY SHIT.png (843x903, 41K)

cope

no, it's god. satan is an inverted star.

No, a five pointed, upright star is a pentagram. By defintion.

Attached: f01ade0d83a95cb3196fa3a41046809f (1).jpg (368x500, 49K)

in medieval times an upright star was a symbol for god and if you inverted it then it meant the devil. I don't care that wicca or meme religions think.

Right right, your magic book is better cause it's older, I know.

yes, because it's the original connotation, not the meme revisionist one for teenage emo sluts.

And because you're the ultimate authority on what symbols mean, and not how they're ultimately used. Symbols cannot change, and they always mean what they originally mean, which is why a cross is only meant to mean a form of execution and nothing more. Because symbols cannot be change through societal use.

you're just salty you're wrong. sorry, nothing personnel kid.

Cope

Attached: a63cd9e38964634741a5a3fe89055308_XL.jpg (960x600, 367K)

have sex

ca/v/eman here.

I thought Yea Forums was supposed to be smart or something.

not lately. lots of summerfags are here now

This is the expected level for Nabokov threads; his banality invites shit like this

I approve of this post

Attached: Wittgenstein.jpg (902x902, 149K)

t. redditor

i hate when authors and artists i like are mean about each other
it's like when my parents fight
i love you both ok

fuck off reddit

nabokov is one of these authors who pull a groin trying to make every sentence a memorable one.

Attached: nabokov.png (1805x624, 93K)