I wasn't always smart, I was actually very stupid in school...

>I wasn't always smart, I was actually very stupid in school ... [T]here was a boy who was very attractive who was even stupider than I was. And in order to ingratiate myself with this boy who was very beautiful, I began to do his homework for him—and that's how I became smart, I had to do all this work to just keep ahead of him a little bit, in order to help him. In a sense, all the rest of my life I've been trying to do intellectual things that would attract beautiful boys.

What did he mean by this? Was he being serious?

Attached: BANCILHON_1984_Michel_Foucault.jpg (620x748, 62K)

It's pretty obviously a tongue-in-cheek comment that probably holds a grain of truth.

What a degenerate faggot Fester-assed motherfucker

>tongue-in-cheek

Attached: 1423271335410.jpg (500x336, 75K)

>became a mega star philosopher just for hot boy ass
Pretty based desu

why not. everything straight men do is in the interest of getting girls

>a grain of truth

Attached: steel-silo-with-grain.jpg (540x405, 35K)

Based Foucault trying to pozz some handsome guys in a power play relationship.

I wonder if he would have helped me with my homework ;)

Foucault erroneously believed in a blank slate theory so he came up with some dumb reason why he was only 'smart' because he had to do a lot of homework, which is perhaps the dumbest bullshit ive ever heard.

>intellectual things attract beautiful boys
Bullshit.

>Foucault erroneously believed in blank slate theory
555-come-on-now

mdr

They do, though. Even young-dumb-full of cum gays are still males, and have the capacity for abstract thought and appreciation of ideas-in-themselves which women lack. As proof, I refer you to the dialogues of Plato.

Reminder that attraction to little boys is a sign of being Yea Forums. See Wilde and Socrates.

I know a thing or two about what I'm talking about. My intellectual side has never played a role in my dealings with hot boys, with perhaps the exception of one or two. And only one of those actually engaged with me, the other one just sat and listened while I lectured. They mostly crave stimulation.

i'm guessing you missed the cognitive revolution episode in the history of science and philosophy anthology

>Foucault erroneously believed in a blank slate theory
Yeah do you wanna justify this statement with some kinda textual evidence bro..

>Was he being serious?
How the fuck would any of us know?

It's in his fucking statement you illiterate mongoloid.
>"i was stupid in school"
>"And that's how I became smart"

>he's only had effeminate mimbos and bases his conclusions off this anecdotal sample

oh you poor dear.

We can debate the subtleties until the cows come home. The fact remains that most people don't have intellectual capability and boys fall under this rule.

In addition to what the other user already said (that your reading comprehension sucks), Foucault spends the first half of his debate with Chomsky denying human nature and insisting that culture/technology determines humanity, which as-much-as amounts to the same thing.

Gays are basically women. They can't think, they can't read. There's no discernible soul.

Its been a while since I've watched that debate. How does Foucault meme his way out of Chomsky's poverty of stimulus argument? Does he just not even address it?

>we can debate the subtleties until the cows come home

With that banality, it's clear that you don't actually want to do so. You might as well have written "at the end of the day". While there is always an unwashed horde, yes, men and women are still ontologically different from each other-this is the whole reason why we even speak of Foucault in the first place, whatever one may think of the content of his ideas.

But I will at least post some cute anime boys, for your trouble. I sincerely hope that you enjoy the image, at least.

Attached: baf8925b3071074555e59675adf9eca8.jpg (1000x1333, 185K)

Oh please. As if you have said absolutely anything of value. This is shit posting not Plato's academy. Get a life, or go for a walk,. Just stop talking to me.

I'm right dude-men have the greater capacity for abstract thought and pure ideas. Your mimbos are the exception which proves the rule. Nice womany dodge btw

There are so many logical flaws in your thinking that it would be an unsightly waste of time to go through each of them. Again I will repeat:
>The fact remains that most people don't have intellectual capability and boys fall under this rule.

Obviously this does not mean ALL, but most. Or maybe that isn't so obvious to you.

not him but i have yet to meet a logical roastie