FACT:

Dostoyevksy isn't a real writer but a playwright and a philosopher who had to contend with putting his philosophical ideas into novel form because he wasn't chad or good enough of a philosopher to just write it in non-fiction form. His work is an abomination.

Attached: dosty.jpg (248x370, 49K)

Tolstoy is the real writer.

Writing philosophy in a form of a novel (and an entertaining one at that) is superior to writing pure philosophy papers: the latter is usually resorted to by people with no imagination or writing skills

While dialogues are unnatural and you can see him in every character, to call him a bad writer or to call his works abominations is insane.

His mind was a cerulean diamond, a mindstone of intense clarity, radiating many-tongued divine whispers and glistening fragmented light, each coloured ray a complete, infinite deobfuscation of soul-heart's heart.

I thought u killed urself... Do it faggot

Actually nvm

The Tsar fucked up when he commuted that sentence, prove me wrong Freeman.

IVE NEVER HEARD THAT BEFORE user

bump

filtered

>I thought u killed urself
What do you mean?

Imagine being so retarded you don't understand philosophers have been using fiction in the form of allegory to present their ideas since the dawn of philosophy. Just because your point of reference is bunch of french and german psudos, doesn't make your opinion valid.

This thread was made by a brazilian tripfag with the name kierkegaard... He posted about committing suicide on r9k, but of course that was fake so now he changed his name to pessoa. He always posts the most inane dae depressed shit and shills his awful book and opinions

FACT: This bait is bad

This

Compare his work to the schlock Ayn Rand wrote.
Then look in the mirror...

Attached: (you).gif (327x251, 1.53M)

What a dumb take. Dosto's novels don't represent his philosophical ideas in any sort of linear way. His novels are discursive (or dialogical, per Bakhtin) in that they represent different voices clashing and arguing with each other, each equally rich and convincing. People are drawn to his work not because of any specific philosophical idea but because ideas are given life in his books, and human intensity.

Dostoyevsky doesn't exist.

This. The fictional process includes rendering ideas into dramatized form. Takes more talent than just writing the idea/ideal outright. Where's the fun in that?

Woah, such a big brain sentence.

tolstoy is trash
gogol >