What is time? Bergon, Einstein, Deleuze, Nick Land, John Zerzan offer different takes. What is it
What is time? Bergon, Einstein, Deleuze, Nick Land, John Zerzan offer different takes. What is it
Parker Parker
Other urls found in this thread:
plato.stanford.edu
fs.blog
twitter.com
Sebastian Thomas
ITT: LARP as a STEMfag/analyticfag
Kek at philosophers navel gazing. Time is just the time it takes for one piece of matter to move to another position. This can be measured by my computer btw
Owen Wilson
What if there is no matter?
Joseph Nelson
it's just the succession of states of universes. You have the physical world in a static moment, more or less understandable, then you have a bunch of these that merge with each other like a series of lines becoming a rectangle.
The causal relation between the lines is just a rule for how reality can align its successive states, like the rules of counterpoint tell you what the next bit of each voice can be in its harmonic moment.
It is weird that we are aware and we consciously experience this succession of states I guess.
Eli Gomez
TIME IS A SEA OF BODIES
Jason Myers
A forth dimension we perdue through as temporal parts.
plato.stanford.edu
Liam Mitchell
Ackshully the analytics have been doing a lot of good philosophy of time metaphysics recently
Jason Jenkins
is this better than whitehead?
Grayson Taylor
Process
Nicholas Cooper
That's nice and might tell us something about how objects persist through time, but what does this position tell us about its structure and ontology? I figure a presentist and eternalist about time might be able to hold either endurantism or perdurantism as true without compromising their temporal ontology.
Ethan Anderson
I still can't read an analog clock
Luke Powell
They are so far removed from one another that it's not worth comparing. Sider is working within the tradition of analytic metaphysics of time, while Whitehead is off the reservation doing his own thing. Wholly different concerns
James Morales
Sider argues for a perdurantist position I think, on my backlist.
Ayden Green
the little hand is the hour, which is pointed at 10, if it were in between the 10 and 11, it would be roughly 10:30. You look at the minute hand to see the minutes, it's the one pointed at 2 and is slightly longer, the difference is usually more obvious than the pic in op. The thin hand is the second hand, which is often omitted, and shows the seconds. The three hands move simultaneously.
Isaac Roberts
thanks that actually helped
Joshua Kelly
I know. I'm saying that perdurantism is merely an account of persistence through time and not an ontology of time itself.
Lucas Nguyen
oh and should have mentioned that since the relevant numbers are 12(hours, half the day) and 60(minutes in an hour and seconds in a minute) you have to multiply the 12 by 5 to get the second and minute hand readings. So the second hand pointed at the 2 is 10 minutes(times 5), that is why there are 5 little sections in the arc between the numbers. Easy to just think of it in terms of 5s. 10, 15, 20, 25, etc. you quickly think of a 6 on the clock as either a 6(am or pm) if the hour hand is one it, or a 30 if the second hand is on it.
Cameron Russell
unironically an illusion
Xavier Perez
Based explaining user
Cameron Stewart
>the second hand pointed at the 2 is 10 minutes(
the minute hand* sorry, im dumb
Luke Anderson
This explains the delayed choice experiment and entangled photons.
Aiden Brown
You should of never come here.
Leo Robinson
"should have"
Parker Baker
A human construct meant to measure entropy but ultimately oppresses you and cucks you, wagie.
Thomas Watson
Aristotle on time fs.blog
Brandon Mitchell
THE CONTINUITY OF MIND
reminder:
Peirce was the only one to understand the unity of space and time before special relativity.
Peirce's evolutionary cosmology can interpret quantum mechanics
Peirce's catagories furnish the findings of science to this day and more to come.
Alexander Martin
Should of
Isaiah Hall
Can you explain zerzan's concept please? Haven't gotten down to reading him yet
Landon Butler
What do they all say?
Daniel Anderson
Fuck off, nufag.
Jordan Williams
Should've
William Ramirez
>should'ov've'in'tlessnesslessness
Nolan Martin
btfo
Hudson Sanders
Time is simpler than you think. It's a constant here on Earth. Who cares about inconsistencies when nothing living is out in the cosmos anyways?
Lincoln Russell
No, time is constant nowhere. If you fly on an airplane, your watch will run slower compared to how it runs on the ground and this can be measured.
Matthew Mitchell
redpilled
Angel Fisher
What is the Fermi paradox?
Zachary Gutierrez
>Nick Land
imagine thinking he's on the same level as the others
Josiah Reyes
The bitcoin gimmick doesn't make it good
Leo Torres
"bro time is just time"