Nietzsche BTFO?

Attached: 5ABC014A-F612-4CFE-B994-5EE85E83ABAC.jpg (326x499, 46K)

reread lol

you completely misread like 99% of sub-120 IQ midwits and retards who read this book. dostoyevsky was a nietzschean, crime & punishment is profoundly nietzschean but you have to dissect the layers of cutting irony and misdirection. this book really shouldn't be read unless you've read all of nietzsche's oeuvre WITH REPUTABLE COMMENTARIES AND SECONDARY LITERATURE and also dostoyevsky's earlier novels

imagine being this much of a pseud.

midwit cope

dostoevsky was not a nietzchean, if anything its the other way around

dostoevsky evades nietzsche's critique because of the eastern orthodox perspective on life, suffering, and heaven and hell

>Dosto was neetchian
That is a yaiks from me daug

>the eastern orthodox perspective on life, suffering, and heaven and hell
Does Catholicism fail to evade Nietzsche's critique?

evades? no, but it can refuted...the orthodox don't really need to refute nietzsche, thats what i mean by evading his critique

nietzsche, like heidegger, is far more damaging to catholicism than to orthodoxy

why is the book so boring ? I feel like im forcing myself to read it at this point waiting for the murder to happen.

The murder is right at the beginning you pleb

Reading’s not for you, give up

What the fuck? Get cancer, pseud.

he was existentialist but doesn't he follow a more kierkegaardian tradition?

imagine been this fucking stupid

Isn't the murder literally in the first part?

what kind of anime Fyodor like?

Nitch loved Dosto. Said he was the only psychologist from whom he had anything to learn.

kek

Good bait