Which one do you prefer ?

Hegel takes Kant's system to its necessary conclusion. You cannot have one without the other, you micro-lobed PSEUD

Hegel didn't assume randomly about things outside our experience

rationalism + empiricism

not really. kant outright told fichte that he misunderstood his philosophy

trump

Hegel wasn't a historicist

is that pic from school of life?

Attached: 41988FB1-89DA-497C-BA2B-FEF21B8903D3.jpg (563x679, 86K)

are you implying: since hegel amounts to only a small fraction of hume, therefore kant? odd argument

>things can be learned from experience
look at this dooed

shut the fuck up Alain de Botton.

What would Kant and Hegel's Sith names be? I can see Hegel having Darth Geist. What about Heidegger?

I Kant decide.

I just Kant.

Attached: kant_to_german_idealism.png (1883x613, 111K)

Hegel, his material is rightfully a next step after Kant, and like Hegel once said, Kant lacks abstraction

Neither, Hegel is just Marx with added spooks

For me, it's Hegel because he attempted to breakthrough the Kantian autism of placing man outside of nature and a modern theory of organism (from which he derived his dialectics) may make Hegelian-type metaphysics viable.

Kant misunderstood his philosophy. Metaphysics is a necessary condition for knowledge.

haven't read either but I go with my brother Kant because in Schoppenhauer I trust.

Attached: aiportraits_1563737751.jpg (1024x512, 148K)

Who fucked more women?

>el goblino
vs
>la granny
chose another criteria my guy

me 22222222

I can almost guarantee Hegel did. Kant was a literal manlet and much like today, big brains don't make up for shortness

Hegel

SCHOPENHAUER

Attached: 1559864841735.jpg (1536x1536, 202K)

Goethe

I've been scouring the archive for this post forever. Thanks user.