Guess the philosopher

It's mostly that so many of his influences are figures in Schelling's milieu but Schelling is not present, that and the fact that he was both influenced by and influential on Fichte

In what way was Leibniz influenced by Spinoza? In fact, didn't he hate his philosophy?

You can be influenced by philosophical opponents. It helps you define your arguments in a more proper way

Although he publicly repugned Spinoza insofar as Spinoza was popularly viewed and frowned upon as an icky determinist, Leibniz was privately fascinated with Spinoza, and discreetly met with him in person, and his Monadology is extremely obviously influenced by Spinoza's Ethics.

Yes

Attached: BA5C257B-BFF9-42A9-9A45-6F0D1F2375DB.jpg (640x385, 80K)

Marcus Aurelius

Nope

Attached: Screenshot_20190702-133811_Chrome.jpg (978x1309, 514K)

Foucault?

u niggas stay gessin... imma just chill here like "who tha fuck is philsoophy??"

Badiou. Mao gives it away.

Badiou most likey

here is one that might be a little more tricky

Attached: Screenshot_20190702-112530__01.jpg (1080x1533, 266K)

Epictetus

Epictetus

Bergson. Has to be early 20th C french conty

right

these would make great University Challenge questions

Attached: phil.png (495x718, 67K)

If it was Epictetus it would list Musonius Rufus as an influence.

I think it's Chrysippus.

No he liked spinoza's early stuff spinoza hated leibniz

Try guessing this one

Attached: question.png (398x328, 37K)

Is this Dummett?
I can't think of anyone else who would read Quine, Russell, Kripke, Levinas, and Buber.

Analytic philosopher, I'm leaning towards anscombe/geach but could be ayer?

Seneca

Stirner

Critchley?

Dammit, that was quick

might be harder than I thought it would be

Attached: Screenshot_20190702-113734__01.jpg (1079x511, 81K)

That was really good right in between hegel and marx

>Influences: Hegel, Fichte

>Influenced: Marx, Junger

ezpz stirner

It was Putnam, you guys just overthought it lol

Aww lol was thinking directly postwar

putnam

Shouldn't be too hard.

Attached: inf.png (262x174, 6K)

Come now, you know this one

Attached: phil3.png (495x313, 21K)

Check out this absolute fucking unit

Attached: 81f393d70b0f60f54ab19ae9769d6ca1.png (269x140, 7K)

too ez

Early 20th C Russian literary figure influential in Bataille & Deleuze. Drawing a big blank here.

Mainländer

Shestov

Sorry guys, in a meeting. Chrysippus.

Hey, at least it's kinda funny

Correct on Shestov

Erasmus? I'm not cheating btw

correct on Mainlander too

We did this already wolff gives it away

Correct

Attached: 64271DF9-42D2-473C-9B49-43FAC439C971.png (1136x640, 82K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-07-02.png (1682x982, 169K)

Blanchot?

Kierkegaard.

Kant. The Unit.

Thoreau?

Si

if you guys are going to post obscure contys im going to post obscure analytics

good luck bitch

Attached: phil6.png (484x238, 12K)

yep

Attached: Screen Shot 20190702.png (805x526, 90K)

Attached: E321D27C-8F92-489D-B249-D025F18C2ED8.jpg (640x1009, 283K)

Bataille?

proudhon

Correct

Attached: 34D2DA2B-AC4A-4163-9E37-695FCFB0086E.jpg (1136x468, 70K)

Yeah def. putnam like one user said. Yoy can tell because of Kierkegaard + chosen """philosophers""" + analytics

Hayek

Rorty

>Geory Cantor
>Mao Zedong
Yeah it is that guy

Who am I?

Attached: 20190702_175335.jpg (1080x592, 249K)

A contemporary of Sergey Bulgakov

Also tfw no based bro to discuss and develop my philosophy with as revise and critique each other

Lev Shestov.

Buber?

Some random guy(maybe woman?) Who wants to revive Direct reference theory. Marcus has very different appraoch in linguistic philosophy, so it will be rare

Not quite.

I picked one very strange guy

Attached: Screenshot_20190703-080550_Chrome.jpg (1080x512, 207K)

hmm Dostoy as both influence and influenced...

Jason Unruhe

Tolstoy

Balzano

*Bolzano

Warmer!

Where can i look up those charts?

Got to Wikipedia page of the philosopher you want and it is in the box on the right hand side.

Wikipedia you mongoloid lmao

ah thanks, never looked at it this way

Hahaah what the fuck is wrong with you?

nothing, just didn´t know this feature

Try this one

Attached: unknownphilosopher.jpg (659x361, 64K)

Wasn't laughing at that I was laughing at your acting like that guy revealed some profound truth to you, a new way of looking at things.

It's alright bro you're probably not a native speaker

EZ one

Attached: QYxF4XORN7.jpg (463x181, 29K)

>Wasn't laughing at that I was laughing at your acting like that guy revealed some profound truth to you, a new way of looking at things.
Yeah, sometimes you discover new things in the most common places

Weininger

>anne conway

Literally who?

>Virtually all subsequent Western philosophy
kek

Attached: up.jpg (432x181, 27K)

real behemoth here

Attached: 1538116842395.png (269x687, 142K)

Deleuze? I think Melanie Klein gave it away

Foucault?

Plato
>now
who am I, fellow virtually all subsequent western philosophy?

Attached: Screenshot (102).png (338x190, 8K)

kek

because phone niggers dont deserve anything. kys.

no

more in the leftist direction

Attached: up2.jpg (440x265, 54K)

maybe augustine

nope

Nope, but close.
Also that picture might be a fake, but it should still make sense

Althusser?

pretty easy one

Attached: Untitled.png (280x207, 7K)

Pseudo-Dionysius
Duns Scotus

>Pseudo-Dionysius
yep

>Duns Scotus
yes
another slow pitch

Attached: Untitled.png (294x185, 7K)

I just wanted to let everyone in this thread know that I am judging them based on their purple links.

>not browsing in private mode

Attached: 3A92CAB2-A0E0-4125-B2EA-BD5A10CC9CB1.jpg (640x615, 167K)

Democritus

Ye

Attached: Captura de tela de 2019-07-02 22-45-07.png (271x345, 27K)

This is just theology,We're here to guess the philosopher

Mainländer
Castoriadis
Saussure
Plantinga
Nobody cares

I know I'm right because I verified it.

Why is every person not influenced by Plato or Aristotle?

Not all of them were :^)

Attached: image.jpg (750x390, 35K)

How could I forget

Attached: 5BFAF2C5-4081-459D-AE31-842D12734E46.jpg (1200x413, 148K)

>Platinga
Correct

Turgenev

damn you're a pseud if you don't know who she is

Sartre?

Pushkin?

Aristotle

That's a load of bullshit user and you should feel bad for posting it.
Leibniz didn't like Spinoza's philosophy at all and the rare convergences come from them being both influenced by Descartes. He is fascinated by it like he was fascinated by averroists.
Also Spinoza acquaintance-zoned Leibniz when the latter was young. Spinoza really had terrible taste and judgement of people in general though. He maintained correspondance with literally whos of little value while ignoring the actually intelligent people that tried to contact him. But Leibniz might have been personally butthurt about this.

One of the rare female of worth in the field.
Her being listed as a notable influencer of Leibniz while Duns Scot and Augustine arennt there is a stretch though.

'twas Klossowski

99% sure it's Timothy Williamson. Read Modal Logic as Metaphysics back when I went down a Kripke-ascribed rabbit hole.

Sartre

Sorry I'm late but it wasn't Socrates

who?

It's Pythagoras

Yes