Well I take exception to your implication that top lass was a pseud but literally every philosopher that has ever existed and likely ever will exist is inconsequential compared to Aristotle himself. The enlightment called him THE philosophe for a reason. Pseuds and the wise alike have no choice but to return at root to Aristotle.
Ayn Rand
Blake Nelson
Isaac Sanchez
No, he's much worse. I take it you don't read books about Hegel, given that you didn't know this already? It's fine, not everyone can glide aloft the heights of intellect: you are like the downs to my uppers.
Dylan Johnson
>Ayn Rand was not a pseud
Landon Torres
Developed, robust, and integrated her system was. She identified new logical fallacies that were, unbeknownst to the people committing them, at the heart of countless precedi g philosphies (fallacy of; stolen concept, floating abstraction, frozen abstraction ect).
Point out the pseudery Tom.
Blake Garcia
Henry Harris
What about Bacon "in your definition"
Alexander Perry
Good work on induction, better refered to as a philosopher of science.
Cameron Lee
>Point out the pseudery Tom.
Writing a dreadful 1000 page novel to proselytise your philosophy because you know writing non fiction would expose your weak ideas is about as pseud as it gets. L Ron Hubbard tier.
Not only was Rand a pseud, but you are too. You don't really know about?philosophy (otherwise you wouldn't make the claims about Rand that you do), but are trying to appear as if you do, textbook pseud
Jordan Peterson
Aaarrgh, ultra giga nigga has been defeated
Dominic Perry
>L Ron Hubbard tier
>youtube.com
You were -given- your opinion on rand.
>Writing a dreadful 1000 page novel to proselytise your philosophy because you know writing non fiction
She DID write nonfiction dumbass. You fags still haven't gotten over the asshurt of the potency of John Galt's speech have you? Which is why you harp on about her fiction, as if it were the most relevant thing about her.
>You don't really know about?philosophy (otherwise you wouldn't make the claims about Rand that you do), but are trying to appear as if you do, textbook pseud
>Rand is bad, therefore saying she is pseud
Real robust logic there cat.