Any books to help cope with the collapse of western civilization?

bet she makes a mean succotash

Hola onions Beta!! :DD

Attached: beta.jpg (1200x630, 109K)

On tomorrow with the other 10 candidates. They split it.

lmao the fucking filter changed s o y

Hola newfriend

That's because they gave her the most time and are asking her the most questions, brainlet. She's very rehearsed and obviously is mentally ill. She bothers me so much I could only take 5 fucking responses of hers. Yes, I was counting them. Stupid debate. Stupid Lester playing favorites again.

Why would they pump up Warren? Do they really think she can take down Trump?

They want to divide the Bernie vote as much as possible so that Biden wins.

how new r u

Hmm.

Oh. They’re having debates now?

Yay, Tulsi got in there

Attached: 24BF9C20-C72C-40AF-A909-7315FACF6EC2.jpg (1379x689, 312K)

shut the fuck up

She could. But yes this

For you; these

I found this out when trying to type S o y lent Green

Attached: A97C15B8-212E-44EA-9411-351974B0C03B.jpg (1269x598, 263K)

Unironically.

Attached: 9780892811250_4.jpg (600x900, 140K)

>If you need a license to drive a car you need a license to buy a gun
What are rights vs privileges?

Attached: 33481015d04b3974f9ed7acf616592901b13507ebdabf48ee1d6d09d63acc2c4.png (1070x601, 507K)

ive been talking way more to my muslim friends

They given Warren the least questions, moron

Flowers for algernon

Whatever the Supreme Court wants them to be brainlet.

What did the 2nd Amendment mean by a “well REGULATED militia”?
Quick answer:
It means you’re living a lie.

In the meantime, the 1st amendment is shredded and means nothing to anyone anymore

Count yourself lucky Amerifren, us canacuks already need a weekend-long safety course to apply for a gun license to own 5-round 5.56 chinkshit rifles

Bernie should parachute in, shoot everyone, and win.

It means read Columbia vs Heller you tranny faggot

>healthcare and cutting your dick off is a human right
>owning a gun isnt
Feels bad ameribro

There is no coping. Opposition is the only viable option.

Attached: 1552936415205.jpg (777x777, 152K)

Ufff

I think it points to a bigger problem, butterbabe. If the second amendment needs to be removed, why? :3

What sort of difference has occurred to make the guns that much more onerous (barring the technological developments).

>t. zoomerfaggot

Yea Forums is dead

Hm? Oh so they changed the wording because of this case? They took the word “regulated” out striping the congress from regulating guns?

No. Clearly not.
Is Assange still alive?

Joe Webb should run again. And pick a greenie for his VP.

Handguns in the home. That’s the extent from heller.

I bet yer whole family’d vote fer ‘im this time

Lmao they’ve stopped showing Warren after that user made a comment. Huh.

succotash succotash win some cash

She's an economic nationalist too

Trump is hiding Assange in my basement

honk honk

What books do you think they read?

Elizabeth Warren doesn't read books, she's part of an oral culture.

How to be black

Yang gang didn't make it?

Warren is a fucking lawyer who has introduced hundreds of bills. Enjoy being an uneducated faggot who's never touched a legal textbook, statute, or code book.

Learning Spanish for dummies.

Paper fuckin tigers everywhere, tired of this worn out doomer narrative

Attached: tenor.gif (350x232, 461K)

God you're embarrassing. Just enjoy the joke. None of this shit matters. You think any of the horror is gonna stop because you elect a finance wonk?

tomorrow

Me? I'm an Andrew Yang kind of guy.

this is entirely plausible. They're notorious for underhanded, shady dealings like this.

Who won the debate?

Mexico.

Attached: 1561606699063.webm (640x360, 321K)

But none of them want that. You seem kind of tarded user

God that was great. Beto stole that shit right out from Booker

are journalists shills on /lit too?

How shit was their Spanish? I didn’t get to see the debate but I heard, I can only assume it was some shit-tier Duolingo quality

Attached: B441B15B-CB50-4149-88E5-2FD5F289830F.jpg (375x563, 19K)

What is the appeal of Yang other than

>LMAO the only solution to automation is to....give everyone $1000?

It sounds a lot like
>we want the NEET vote

Attached: 21AC658A-D098-4330-9166-3C8390888006.jpg (1280x720, 374K)

Not American so forgive the ignorance, but I have a question

Why do you have so many candidates for only 1 party? Doesn’t that just clog up the debate and make it so nothing of actual value can be debated?

Why only two parties? From what I can tell there are more than 2, but the big 2 have such a stranglehold that the smaller parties will never win. Why not change that?

Good questions

Attached: Anatomy of the State.jpg (240x368, 28K)

Technically smaller parties can win the same way, but Americans are pretty brainwashed by the whole party ideology, they would never go against their precious horde

Attached: 1441778640.jpg (380x515, 20K)

user, as late as the 1992 election a third-party candidate won something like 20% of the popular vote. The two-party system has everything to do with the way the winners of our elections are determined, i.e., by a simple majority. It’s the same reason there’s a de facto two party system in the UK, lib dems notwithstanding

Attached: CE50D4FD-5DBC-4875-B0F7-DB889C7E9F40.jpg (326x499, 26K)

The Foundation for Exploration

ive been staying away from /pol/itics to the best of my ability. I do like nick fuentes though and he roped me in for this debate. It has made me realize that my best option is to continue to ignore all politics going forward.

i guess it was okay? it doesnt take much to just say the right words if you practice enough. the pronunciation and accent gives it away though, those were god awful. be prepared for non spanish speakers to rave about how "good" beto's spanish is

1) This is pretty atypical, and I think it will probably hurt the Democrats. I’m only speculating, but I imagine it has to do with the Democratic Party’s failure in the last presidential election and consequent “existential” crisis. Of course they don’t really seem to have learned anything or to have changed, and a milquetoast candidate will probably be selected with the assistance of the DNC and major donors.

2) We have winner-take-all voting system, where the winner of elections is determined by whoever wins the plurality of votes. I think it would require a constitutional amendment to change this, which would be prohibitively hard to get through, even though some politicians and legal scholars have suggested it

Why ignore it? Is it because most of these people, barring a few exceptions, don’t care for anything other than power and pleasing corporate overlords

Did they really all speak spanish to pander? Hate that shit, like when they do that over enunciation of some spic countries name. Like they know they have the spic vote.

im a spic and this shit isnt cute or endearing. if anything it just makes them look more like idiot gringos than they already do

Whats that china man doing in the middle there?

I’m really pleased by how well Bernie has managed to influence the Democratic Party.

Will they still fail to nominate Bernie in favor of some boring corporate Democrat and still lose to Trump? Yes

Will the Democrats still be a tone deaf as ever to how the average American feels? Yes

Will the typical corporate Dem still fall to his knees to fellate corporate donors? Yes.

But Bernie’s influence is still being felt, and I dare say some of the questions on M4All, student loans, etc. wouldn’t even be asked this election if not for the fact that he’s still extraordinarily popular, and is arguably one of the only truly likes politicians left in the Democratic Party.

Polite sage as not Yea Forums and just more politics

Attached: DF4CD80B-20D8-4078-B2C3-7CC8ED7689DD.jpg (750x765, 118K)

Tigers actually have the souls of Chinamen. So if your spirit animal is a tiger, you're being guided by a Chinaman.

Yeah I think you pretty much got it. That and these people have nothing to offer me.

Bernie will be at the debate tomorrow, as is Yang if you’re okay with a “I'll pay you $1000 a month to fuck off and never ask for anything” mentality. Other than that you’re probably on the right track for being disappointed in the Dems.

I’m still completely blown away that they though Hillary was a good candidate in 2016, like how the fuck are you so out of touch

Attached: D7142DDB-EDB7-4333-83B8-B941411DED44.jpg (720x960, 112K)

>2% wealth tax on rich fucks just like they already tax homes
>comprehensive five point anti-lobbying law
>lower the student debt burden
I see nothing wrong here. She thought she was Indian and put that down after already making into an Ivy league school. Who gives a shit?

I’m hoping Bernie gets it, but Warren is an acceptable alternative for me desu, I like her.

Legit laugh every time that fucking video of her collapsing gets posted desu

>implying that corporate shill wouldn't just fall back on all that shit

Survive the economic collapse by Piero San Giorgio

I prefer Bernie just because he sounds like he knows how to get shit done. Unlike Obama he said he'll campaign against any democrat that doesn't support his policies rather than try to placate Republicans who won't vote in favor of anything he wants.

>yank politics and all these tankies

>more tax
>more law
What if we just got rid of the laws that cause the problem instead of adding more laws?

Who is the most annoying Democratic candidate, Bros?

For me, it’s Pete buttigieg with Yang at a close second.

Attached: 0E61713C-E111-4942-9989-A19E202E1D2D.jpg (422x550, 59K)

>I think it would require a constitutional amendment to change this
Maine has at least gotten through ranked choice voting without being shut down by the courts. We could also remove some of the harsh ballot access requirements. The UK has a winner take all system and still manages to get a substantial amount of third party representation in government. We're just particularly bad even among countries with this kind of voting system.

>lower the student debt burden
Yeah, lets distribute a shit ton of wealth to privileged people instead of helping, you know, actual poor people.

Warren's tax burden alleviation plan is means tested, dummy. The poor get preferential treatment.

That’s it.

Simple answer. Shits fucked on purpose. Plus the DNC is a far right party masquerading as a “party of the people”

I used to like her, but I can’t trust her to be anything but an Obama rerun. Not sure About Bernie anymore either. I prefer Tulsi

>Still thinks there’s an immigration crisis.

If I had to narrow it down to 2:

Beto:
Lmao what is this Spanish shit? I know you’re trying to Larp as hard as you can as a Latino, but we all know you’re just an Irish Catholic mutt with a nickname. Fuck off

Booker: He’s also talking in mangled Spanish, but at least he’s not Larping. I still remember when he tried to tell off Obama as being too “mean” to the bankers of the 2008 crash....the bankers who got $400 Billion no questions asked, served no jail time, nor got a fine. Absolute shit tier

debt burden*

The poor don't go to college.

Why Tulsi

They go to college, they just become indentured servents to do so

Source: first in family to go to college, most childhood meals were bologna sandwiches and whatever leftovers mom brought back from her waitress job

Personally liked how, when the candidates were asked about Medicare for All, they immediately started talking about abortion because they know their positions on it suck and they don’t want to miss out on that lobbyist money drying up

>They go to college
No they don't. They have to go to work, or live on the street.

Look, all keeping students in heavy debt does is stunt economic growth while turning Americans further down the path of anti-intellectualism. We should have never cut the funding to higher education in the first place from having student's cover 20% of tuition to covering 80 in public universities, especially when the cost of making them free is less than the INCREASE Trump gave to our military budget. If anything, we owe a substantial amount of these student's the money just on a moral level for letting them be extorted. The returns you get from investing in education are substantial, and we decided to let private hands take advantage of that fact for their own greed rather than the common good.

Sander’s policies plus she didn’t sheepdog us into the 2016 debacle. There’s no guarantee she can end the wars without getting accidentally assassinated, but her anti-war stance almost cost her being allowed to the debates. MSM downplays her from what I’ve seen
Not watching closely at all though

>The returns you get from investing in education are substantial
Certain types of education. If the returns were substantial we would't be having this discussion.
>path of anti-intellectualism
How? Having too few college graduates really isn't a problem America has.

It’s made how Americans thing the democrats are left wing. America is a lost cause.

Elections and the MSM are a lost cause. The people need to work around them.

fpbp

Attached: stack.jpg (563x1000, 98K)

It was a joke that smoothbrains never moved on from.

tism

Tulsi was the only candidate on the Democrats side that I would have realistically considered voting for but the entire party decided to shit on her just because her foreign policy doesn't involve over throwing dictators in far away lands

same. I couldn't stand to listen to those idiots so I watched a NOVA episode about Neil Armstrong instead. He was a cool dude. Caught the last couple of minutes on NBC, just long enough to hear Tulsi say Trump should go back into the Iran Deal (giving them billions of dollars to fund terrorism).

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Warren became the compromise pick.

unironically, Stirner and Machiavelli

If you literally read the federalist papers, you would know the way they used regulated in the second amendment doesn't mean what you think it does.

The hispanic guy

no

Anyone who cares about the 2nd amendment should know that Thom Jeff. who fought to get a bill of rights in the first place also put that in as a compromise to what he really wanted: a restriction on having a standing army to prevent a military take over of the government. Neocons who pretend to care about the founding fathers should locate the nearest rope.

No one here is a neocon user.

And I suppose jailing and torturing journalists is perfectly legal.

Your laws are nothing

Immigration is the single largest issue. Deporting all illegals and visa workers and indefinitely halting all future immigration would help American workers more than any other single policy and its effect stretches further than wages.
It would increase wages more than any other policy, lower the cost of housing even tank it in cities that need it the most such as NYC, the lower pool of labor would encourage companies to train workers themselves instead of relying on college or trade schools, employers would be encouraged to lower the requirements for jobs, employers would have to treat their employees better, the higher wages and much easier time of being middle class would decrease drug addiction and decrease single parent families, etc etc.
Most big cities and metropolitan areas would end up with a $15+ minimum wage without the government having to directly enforce it, that $15+ minimum wage would be due to supply and demand.
Would corporate cock suckers and companies complain about having to pay $15+ due to supply and demand? Of course! I bet they get mad when some leftist says there should be a cap on profit, very hypocritical!
>but muh labor shortage
There is no labor shortage, that is all corporate propaganda to keep the gates open. It is in businesses and the college system's best financial interest to say there is a shortage even if there isn't. The workforce participation rate is 2% lower than it was 10 years ago under Obama. There are millions of people not counted in the unemployment number that should be. The unemployment number is pretty much useless, what matters is wages and the number of people without a job that want one or would be willing to take one if offered enough.
>but there are millions of unfilled jobs
If you care about pay then you should not want all jobs to be filled, all jobs being filled = lower wages. You should want as many open jobs as possible so there is more competition that benefits workers

Nietzsche is great but I dislike the portable Nietzsche

Tulsi won

Attached: 2cbbc11e294499d33ed78df93f229ef010bf069bf9355f39fc9db58bb4d2f5c6.png (283x449, 11K)

because the partys are fake. maybe thats hyperbole, but barely

shouting rrrrrobert orourke at my television like a daniel day lewis character

If you want to read all of him, go right ahead. The Portable has quite a hefty chunk of his work

She’s quite popular.
The right want out of the wars too, so you know she can beat Trump easily. CIA better not shoot her

So you concede the point and admit you have no argument? You just wrote random nonsense besides the point because you knew you lost.

>drudge

Attached: steve-bannon.jpg (620x465, 33K)

Sure sure sure. Just don’t shoot anybody.
Fucking moron

You didn't refute my point at all. You are the definition of pseudo intellectualism. Just a pathetic waste of space that hides behind insults when proven wrong. Dilate Tranny.

——> >Your laws are nothing
Your Federalist Papers aren’t supposed to supersede the constitution, but as i have had to indicate a second time. I don’t care. Law is a house made of shit.

Attached: D791CEA2-A2A9-4D55-B059-00793797BB66.jpg (1024x711, 65K)

seethe more

I think at some point he said white people are allowed to exist or something so that automatically made him the most acceptable Democrat in the eyes of conservatives. It's too bad his own party thinks he's evil now.

>Your country is totally not being flooded with low iq third worlders, goy. It's totally not a crisis, goy.
tranny opinion discarded

Hey guys, how many times did the federalist party win the presidency again?
What was that?
Only once?
Then the democratic-republican party won six times in a row and they had to rebrand themselves as the whigs?

Attached: 2915353450_6f51122bd4_b.jpg (657x1024, 208K)

They asked her the most questions, vapid mouthbreether. Watch the first 30 minutes and count.

Yikes. Will butterfaggot ever recover?

Attached: 1513140606284.png (500x446, 91K)

Non-arguments.

Fuck philosophy, read geopolitics

Attached: zeihan.jpg (400x400, 28K)

Pete and Booker. Yang isn't annoying. His fan base is.

t not poor
They can't go to college. They're ineligible for parent plus loans which means the maximum coverage of government loans is only enough to cover tuition, scarely. They want more than $8 a meal a day. They want huge expenses for living. It's only remotely possible to go to school poor if you commute. Not every poor person lives close to a school. They be off the busline and may not even have money for a vehicle. Also if poverty forces them out, and they fall into default, they literally cannot go back to school.
This.

They all look like demonic rats. Wait a minute...Demo...c...rats...

Killing Hope by William Blum
Learn that America deserves it

You can't go into spengler expecting a book you breeze through and forget about it, The Decline of the West is a complete restructuring of history and a philosophy of life

and completely free from scientific inquiry
just dont read spengler

>Make everything free with white peoples money
Wow. Real indepth policy

Attached: 1561454883528.jpg (542x475, 37K)

>who needs proofs when I have feelings!

Have sex

>muh collapse
Give me a break. You'll know collapse when you see it. This is mild turbulence to put it lightly .

bend over

I love this meme.

>Calls for end to private insurance

Jesus even most of lefty/pol/ wouldn't support that shit

Attached: 1029483040102.jpg (619x619, 130K)

Who is this gentleman? What is the meaning?

The midwit fool professing himself to he wise.

fuck off to /pol/ retard

The good thing though, is that inter party fighting generally has no effect on the party who is not in power. It caused issues in 2016 because the dems were in control at this point.
Beto was pandering. Castro is from Pinche san antonio.
No kidding.
Warren has been far more procedurally active in congress than Bernie. Bernie is a great talking head, but he has no idea how to structure a law. If only one of the candidates was a law professor or something.
Deregulation has lead to these crisis. There are particular things that should be in place where the government facilitates a competitive market for businesses while still holding companies accountable. Dickey amendments, 2008 financial crisis, medical inflation, education inflation, and plenty of others were all the fault of government "stepping out"
While I love beto's "stake board in a wataburger parking lot" attitude, he really should have ran for a texas seat again. This is embarrassing.
I think that was more an issue of timing and trying to get all their political check marks in.
/pol/ got one thing right, she a qt.
Thank the black panthers and Reagan era racism for your gun rights broski.
The latino guy or the fake latino guy?
>complains about problems unions would fix
>MUH ILLEGALS
BULL MOOSE ALL THE WAY
You forgot your (((THEY)))

Yes.

Attached: 1551296283854.png (642x705, 303K)

Underrated

Is that an actual person who has done so or is it how a person who is wont to do as such is apt to look?

The latter.

If the laws are nothing, why hinge your original argument on isolating a clause from a law and then deliberately misinterpreting it. The “well regulated militia” argument is stupid off of a board dedicated to the written word, if you have a better argument centered on how no law is sacred anymore (or ever) just start with that.

I should get a butterfly tripcode to shitpost with.

That's right. Political economy is a failure. Let's have more political economy.

I would like to fuck (and suck) Tulsi Gabbard.

Low IQ cumbrain.

I just wanted to share my thoughts on this event.
Also, I forgot to mention that she cute.

What are we expecting from the debates tonight?

>Softball questions to Biden, the centrist favorite (note: would be hilarious if someone brought up his weird handsy thug with women)

>”Bernie Sanders, why are you an awful person who thinks Stalin did nothing eron type questions

>Yang pandering to NEETS

>overall lack of cohesion and overwhelming confusion

Attached: 8B03D460-8BB7-4EAE-AAFF-419CD8C55789.jpg (1136x420, 84K)

Those are not your thoughts. They are programs autoexecuting in response to stimuli. They are only your thoughts insofar as you reinforced this process and intentionally seek it out. You cannot perceive this because you lack the intelligence to.

>Those are not your thoughts.
>They are programs autoexecuting in response to stimuli.
Nibba, how these two are different, lol?

>Nibba, how these two are different, lol?

Attached: 1536571896436.png (416x435, 99K)

Love how climate change, the most likely thing to end all human existence, was barely given any air time whatsoever

Very cool Democrat’s, shows us just how serious you lot are!

Attached: 8B09642D-8F42-47FF-A8F0-10E083FAD7B5.png (2120x2440, 150K)

>Love how climate change, the most likely thing to end all human
exaggeration and meme

Will anyone please think of the underprivileged journalists?

You’re the one worrying over muh gun rights.

Obama deported them already. We now have a net zero immigration with Mexico and now more Canadians get in. Its not really a crisis, its a political football meant to excite a voter base. And you fall for it.

Think it over

Why does freedom of speech and the press mean nothing to you? You prefer fake news? You like that YouTube censors your rightwing vloggers?

Npc

Holy shit, is this real? Do we actually have someone here who supports a political candidate?

Yea Forums is /yangland/

Attached: 97b.jpg (1024x576, 76K)

This is the same faggot who wrote the Steven king shit a while back
>waaaaa he's more successful and popular than you
Kill yourself.

>trip

Attached: index22.jpg (150x150, 6K)

kys

If there was a presidential candidate that offered this in my country I would vote for him in a heartbeat. If students don't vote for Sanders it means that they are absolutely cucked

Attached: 65693876_481614552645976_6464923771965800448_n.jpg (636x960, 76K)

>Open borders? Bah, I have not a care in the world. Speed up the capitalist machine, I can compete. Give citizenship to all illegals. This will lower the cost of my low wage based services.

Attached: 768678678.jpg (1080x1331, 97K)

You know as well as I do that he’ll be shoved off the tickets by the DNC Machine

Europe is roasting idiots

Wouldn't this really fuck universities up? good

It’s only worth dealing with if we get rid of the communists and anarchists first.

my sides!!!!

His policy is cucked. Why pay them off? Why waste 2 trillion dollars? Just make them null and void. It's that simple. If universities raise a fuss, we have show trials for everyone opposed. Credit agencies also would be shut down if they even dare to raise issue with it.

Not related to climate, imbecile. Temperature and acute weather events mean nothing. Even the general trend means nothing considering it comes from an n=250 years.

Too many boomers with cushy do nothing admin jobs

Depends on their arraignment. A lot of student loans come from different companies, who i think are getting their money from the government

Whites in China do tremendously well actually, they fetishize whiteness, having a white employee is viewed sort of like having a trophy in your subordinating them.

Fuck them and force them out to the fields, mines and factories.

Unrelated, but did anyone actually fall for that BS story the US was pushing?

Not even Japan fell for it lmao

Attached: 1200CBB5-F8D8-4AA3-ACA4-E9F5C7FDD15C.jpg (750x702, 82K)

Ignore and FILTER the triptranny and it goes away.

Attached: think I'll have a bit.jpg (1232x1080, 154K)

>summerposting this hard

Someone tell him this
If this works how come you still have to say this?

Yea strangle them with your stinky boi panties.

Well these Jewish texts will certainly give insight into why our civilization is collapsing.

Yikes

Sodomites would not be allowed period. They would be expelled or euthanized.

i can't shake the feeling there's more people talking about it and referencing it than those who have actually read the whole damn thing.

poopoo caca, I'm bilingual and it just seemed so forced. "every [to vote]- voter we need representation" Beto 2020 :^)

damn.

Reminder that as our world grows more insane by the day, with division being found of every sector, it provides oneself a greater platform by which to grow spiritually, having to retain compassion and empathy even as the world around you attempts to fracture everyone into warring factions. To retain one's virtues in such a world is to demonstrate greater strength than in a world where everything was peaceful. And while we'd prefer the latter, we've been given the former, and must navigate it wisely.

Please show kindness to all those you see. May all sentient beings know peace and comfort.

Atlas Shrugged

>spends actual money on beard trimmers and hair gel products
>meticulously trims beard and chest hair in the mirror to look good for photoshoot

not manly at all. what a waste of an athletic frame

>>Calls for end to private insurance
>Jesus even most of lefty/pol/ wouldn't support that shit
You can't be serious. This has been a mainstream leftist position for the last 50 years

I have read it and all his essays and books

sucks to be you

the fuck, why? why not just let me keep my insurance and give uninsured people medicare

It's not fair. Not equal treatment. It means if you have money, you get better care. This is not what this country was built on.

Yeah, but that isn't fair either. I'm not totally anti-socialist, but if you're going to spread out risk then you have to disqualify or control certain behaviours. Homeless and mentally ill people are special cases, but otherwise people who are obese, smokers, murderers/gang bangers, etc., should be limited in the type and amount of tax-funded care they can receive. Providing subsidized safety-nets for such behaviours is inefficient and only ensures we get more of said behaviour.

It's also unfair because genetically divergent populations have different predispositions to disease. Why should one population have to pay for the higher disease rates in another?

If only we had a homegenous society

On this topic. Should I marry a chinese guy? He's ivy league educated and speaks English as well as Mandarin.
>if you can't beat 'em, join 'em

where are you from? are you a girl(female)?

based and truthpilled

huh? its literally what this country was built on. raping of the less fortunate and then selling movies/music about it is the most american thing there is

Cars kill far more people than guns, and all of them unintentionally. Cars are far more dangerous than guns. If anything is going to get banned it should be cars.
>omg like becky omg guns are so bad, i saw on the teevee that a kid shot up his school
>*runs over 5 children with her SUV on the way home because she was texting selfies to instabookchat*

In a civilized society, you wouldn't have a significant risk of death just getting around town.

because it´s an illusion that they have a choice, historically larger and more populous states are the most authoritharian

Burgerstan and yes, XX chromosomes. He's probably going to be making six figs and he's infatuated with me. If chinks are going to rule the world it would be logical to get on the winning team. I bet his parents own like a dozen rental properties.

Well, he sounds like he has his future down pat.

1.) Do you like him? Do you love him?
2.) Are you sexually attracted to him, or do you see yourself sexually attracted to him?

DESU, this probably isn't the type of question to ask Yea Forums of all places

what is your height and weight?

it´s an illusion, resurgence of nationalism in western europe and the u.s will backpedalled the liberal reforms and you*ll be outcasted to slavery in mainland china

Historically marriages were for economic convenience. I imagine I could grow to love him. He's not unattractive, and he's pretty qt. It's probably the smart decision to go with him.

that seems to be how the system is designed, intentionally. There are scholarships that can help, but spots are very limited.
Also community college can be very affordable, with the ability to transfer credits to a university if you want the piece of paper with a fancier school name on it.

I should be able to take those properties for myself because I am stronger and more intelligent than that chink.

Attached: smart grugg.png (800x450, 133K)

If only.

Attached: 1536766827095.jpg (600x450, 57K)

US dress size 4, BMI ~20
So you think it's a temporary thing? If he marries me we would have our pick of citizenship, either mcdonaldsland or pandaland, whichever is more advantageous. He's also nice to me and practically worships me. I'm having a hard time seeing the downside. Is love a yes/no thing or can it be grown over time? If women in the past were considered successful if they married a rich husband, should I really be so picky as to turn down a rich guy I don't even dislike?

my hair can do that naturally without any kind of hair gel.

I understand what you mean though, vanity is not a manly trait.

resurgence of nationalism will only sink the west further into disarray, chaos and isolationism, and is exactly what china and russia want.

what state? will you go on a date with me?

what economic benefits can you provide me?

i also have a 6 figure job offer for when i finish uni and wealthy parents.

What a needed post. Thank you kind user.

This man is real? I always thought he was an extremely realistic drawing or 3D model.

Fuck him, marry him, divorce him and get half his wealth. Works wonders for western women, and you might give him a lesson in dealing with goldiggers.

the chinese unironically have much larger brains than everyone else. There is no stopping them, there is a problem though, they will inevitably occupy the highest payed jobs an all first world high standard of living countries. It will get to the point where the countries with the highest percentage of chinese will be the ones at the top, with China itself at the very top far above anyone else. This is going to create a lot of animosity from the locals of those countries.

Larger on average. Smaller distribution. We're not comparing the masses here. We're comparing 160 IQ man against some 120 IQ midwit supreme chink. I could beat him in chess. I could beat him in a fight. I could beat him at almost anything.

are you qt? are you coastie or flyover? i won't live in a flyover.
thing is that by the time you divorce him, you're left in your 30s and it might be hard to get another guy. i want to keep a husband for general partner purposes.

but no really. is love yes/no or can it grow over time? was every woman in an arranged/economic marriage always miserable? did everyone just have affairs all the time? out of literature it seems like cheating was more common than not and most wives and husbands detested each other.

>Bernie is running again
>no refunds 2.0 electric boogaloo
this old kike still has democratic support? Lmao imagine the faggots that are voting for him after cucking out to hillary and stabbing his supporters in the back last time.

Attached: 1554221346842.gif (280x438, 207K)

a guy with an iq of 160 wouldn't browse Yea Forums
we are all midwits here

i am from northern california

>He's not unattractive, and he's pretty qt
Well, that's always a plus! I've got a qt as well.

>Historically marriages were for economic convenience.
Correct, and I applaud you for your knowledge of such things. If you don't mind, though, I must insist that having affection for your partner is a must.

For example, my mother married my father (lawyer) for the money, she told me herself last year after I got a few drinks in her. And after the first two years of marriage, they hated each other. They stuck together, hating each other and subsequently their lives, for the next 19 years, only splitting up when I graduated college and moved out.

My mother then, 2 years post-divorce, married another wealthy man, an engineer. They've been together for 10 years and are still as happy as the day they got married, and my mother (during that same drinking session) burst into tears about "how happy he made her" and "how much better life is now". The difference is that Mom actually loved this man, and wasn't just using him for his money....I try not to look down on her for this admission, but I must admit it's hard not to.

You seem pretty on top of things, but I have to stress how important being happy with your partner is. I would hate for anyone to end up like my mother or father....extremely unhappy and feeding on their hatred towards each other, only bound by convenience. It honestly seems like a hell onto itself.

If you think he's handsome, going to be successful, and will provide financial and geopolitical stability then that is 100% desirable...but you to ensure that you will be *happy* with him. History is littered with domestic tragedies like my mother and father, and it would pain me if I knew you married a man you grew to hate. It's a very emotionally painful and deading lifestyle, you must be sure you can love this man.

Polite sage, as I'm not contributing to the thread desu.

>a guy with an iq of 160 wouldn't browse Yea Forums
Every person I've ever met with a high IQ preferred to experience life first hand and spent their free time cultivating constant improvements in themselves.

No duh, they would never visit this shithole unless it's to get a giggle with a shitpost.

*but you have to ensure
Sorry, English is not my first language, my apologies.

I see. I'm just trying to make a decision I won't regret. That's a good answer. Of course the ideal is wealthy, who you also like. Marrying just for money would be pretty terrible.

Since he's specifically Chinese, off the boat, I was worried about wife-beating, but I suppose that's for /int/. Wish there was Yea Forums about ideal partner selection in modern times that wasn't ophrah winfrey tier feelgood bullshit.

How well do you know him? Have you been on any dates with him?

>wife-beating
don't know about that and the Chinese, but the best policy is, if he lays a finger on you, to get the hell out of there.

>Source: An ex who went crazy after his dad passed and pointed a loaded pistol at me when drunk

>he believes in science

It means the very reverse of a standing army, the ability of the people to take up arms and protect the country, or overthrow it when necessary. Lol retard

No, but it reveals what the language used in the constitution actually means at the time it was written. It is clear that you would pretend words don't change though, and insist that the modern definition of regulation should apply rather than the definition used when it was actually written.

its a real dude but the photo is heavily edited and the guy looks hardly as buff or "manly" as this would make you believe. Just reverse image search, its some russian and his girlfriend is obsessed with modelling him like a JoJo figure

Americ**s are so fucked in the head its not even funny anymore.
Just think about that for a second, every idiot in your country before being allowed to drive has to get a license but you can buy as many literal killing tools as you want because youre murican.
I can hardly believe that anyone with half a brain would support this notion. But yeah, youre burgers after all

The Quran

Harry Potter

source for that tighter distribution claim?
sounds like BS to me.

akshully. that's incorrect, and either way, cars kill FAR more people than guns kill. 99% of gun deaths are niggers killing other niggers. but this isn't even Yea Forums. stop being so assblasted about right to firearms. bongistan has daily knifings and acid attacks, sweden has daily grenadings and explosions, france has trucks of peace.

to keep it on topic: hollerbacks submission happened in france. let's say there are certain problems we don't have in america. use a bit more lube with your ass dildo next time, you seem rather pouty today, francis.

Great post, user.

Based and empathy pilled

If we knew each other in real life, you're the type of person that I'd feel honored knowing

based but ultimately bluepilled

Yeah but they'll also give driver's licenses to any idiot. Haven't you heard the recent news that some regions are granting licenses to illegals? Despite the license hurdle, that's going to be a far more lethal policy than easy access to legal guns (legal guns are responsible for a tiny proportion of actual homocides, sometimes suicides are added to make things scarier).

not to mention most illegals just drive without the license at all. cars need far, far more regulation. every day there's a dozen crashes in my city alone from retards behind the wheel. they need to be more restrictive in car sales and car licensing.

Empathy and humanity are memes and any sort of social system that is dependent on them is destined to fall apart sooner or later.

Literally seething

Attached: 1558834642030.png (461x394, 63K)

It's not just $1000 a month.
>medicare for all
>you have a right to have all your internet data deleted at any time and know who has your data
>supreme court term limits
>everybody gets $100 a year to donate to political campaigns to combat big corporate donors
>willing to use nuclear power to combat global warming unlike all the other democrats

Wtf I love Yang now

Unironically based

>but you can buy as many literal killing tools as you want
flat out wrong but I guess it's easier to trust blindly anything the media says. j'espère que t'es pas français abruti

#4 is potentially clever, not sure how it would turn out in practice, but I'd like to find out.

I was unaware of this...he's a lot better now but still not my 1st choice.
What're yall expecting from tonight

Trump won't win again, we've reached a critical mass of PoC and anti-immigration rhetoric usually provokes a lef-wing backlash against the downright meanness of it all. Besides, illegal immigration has been worse under him than Obama, because his rhetoric radicalized government employees and judges into thinking Our Values were under attack so they'd do anything humanly possible to prevent deportations from happening.

>slew of false statements in hysterical half-literate prose
Yup, it’s eurotard posting. Shouldn’t you be keeping calm? After all it’s slightly hot over there, which means you’ll be having psychosomatic seizures and what not.

How can anyone watch this without cringing to death? The only ones I could tolerate were the ones that are polling the lowest. How did this country go to shit so fast?

Latino immigration. Don't worry, it'll get worse. Soon well have more street shitting than Mumbai.

>being fair isn’t fair!
Stop thinking about money.

You’re talking to an anarchist.

Fuck your constitution, lawyer boy.

You know that's not bad at all.