Yea Forums‘s thoughts on JK Rowling being canceled?

The slippery slope is very real and there is no way to stop it now. Our children will know horrors we cant even imagine

Can someone give me a quick rundown?

It's a leftie eats leftie world out there.

This. Progressivism IS the slippery slope.

Who would’ve thought a rich old white lady from britain could possess *gasp* controversial opinions!
It’s not even a problem with the “left”, its a problem of people giving rowling way too much credit for writing YA lit. These books are nearly 20 years old why does anyone even care about them anymore?

It’s just losers who have achieved nothing going through the power process. They don’t fucking actually care about these issues, they just want to feel powerful and in control, so they try and exert that through cancelling somebody big.

Her writing sucks, that I think we can agree on, but she built a perfect world for children who are slightly excluded from their peers, but not complete outsiders. It was a brilliant move on her part, honestly.

Based and tedpilled

She's a New Labour centrist.

What quality of farts would be fucked right out?

That one vid he made were he was shirtless the whole time and held a snake is what made me watch his channel. Too bad he doesnt include much more eyecandy in his videos :(

Progs really are so fucking clowny, its amazing theyre like the dominant force out there rn

The cancellation of Rowling, as well as nearly all public figures, was a completely arbitrary decision and the product of rapidly shifting fashions and ideological trends mostly occurring in the realm of twitter. When Rowling initially made her venture into wokeness with the hinting of Hermoine being black and Dumbledore being gay, etc. it was applauded and embraced by wokedom who were enamored and in love with her, but within months the fashions shifted and Rowling was retroactively branded as being "fake woke" and no longer in compliance with the arbitrarily shifting fashions

Good lord I hate faggots

Do something about it then pussy

Attached: 0D882989-5812-4732-81BA-1247E6DFF2B9.jpg (400x447, 51K)

What was the first major entry of the no-turning-back point?

fuck trannies

fuck jannies

fuck jews

fuck faggots

and fuck female authors

why yes janny I WILL take that three to thirty day ban

Attached: 1550490086035.jpg (1476x721, 294K)

>These books are nearly 20 years old why does anyone even care about them anymore
Most people are so boring that they can't help but be enchanted by the dullest franchise ever conceived.

>30 posts
>no rundown
>no source
Please go back.

There is no stopping us.

Our power increases with each step in the culture war.

Attached: 1561315187170.jpg (720x580, 233K)

When Adam and Eve ate the apple.

Attached: 1556916884854.jpg (385x282, 38K)

>having the opportunity to attend higher education
>major in something w no job prospects
>spend time bitching on Twitter
>reinforce your victim complex with dense word salad

No hope for these subhumans. Tend to your own garden

He’s cute, but the way he speaks of such a turn off

why has no one beaten philosophy tube to death with a blunt object?

Damn what a qt
youtu.be/3ignNqL60jk

Threadly reminder: PhilosophyTube has not and refuses to read Heidegger because reading anything by a nazi is """"""""problematic"""""""".

she was being made fun of because her pandering was nothing but self-congratulatory twitter wank in order to stay relevant, if you think gay dumbledore has any pop culture legitimacy you also have to consider that she retconned hermione into being black despite multiple contradictory book descriptions, and who could forget that hogwarts has a complex sewer system in a time where wizards were just shitting their pants and magicking away the shit

Leftists are finally realizing that Harry Potter is poorly written? Shocking! Also, has philosophy tube read any Kant?

Attached: 1553591457037.png (670x690, 510K)

probably gay marriage

better question, has philosophy tube understood any Kant?

Attached: kant_intro.png (946x2017, 586K)

giving rights to women, introduce women into the workforce, not killing the niggers while they can

voting unironically

I always edit out the philfag part because language is very important and the mere virtue of it being mistaken and serving to have even implicit endorsement of homosexuality cannot be tolerated.

That's very principled of you. Though I lazily filter such words I tend to agree, the language we use controls how we think. It's important to resist the normalization of vulgarity.

>Woof!

What did he mean by this?

That's very obnoxious of you

he's dog whistling! haha get it? :D

magic is more believable than a man being a woman

>world of shit other people have to wade through
Oh no, a children's book author wont affirm my mental illness on twitter. How can I ever cope
What a stupid tweet. That ass hole doesnt check off any victim boxes, but still gets social affirmation through self degradation and pseudo empathy. What a retarded sub culture

It should be fairly simple to intuit whats going on

>It’s not even a problem with the “left”
example of this from the "right"?

>dominant force
>trump won
>majority of yurop is far right
>africa is far right
>so are arabs and asia

>thread about rene guenon and the true fundamental nature of reality
>magnets the same 3 guenon posters posing as 20 personas - 30 replies at the most
>thread on twitter
>50 replies

I just refuse to accept that such a thing as gender identity even exists, what the fuck does it even mean?

Oops! I accidentally watched him again hahaha. I can't believe I keep accidentally opening these bad videos!

The Glorious Revolution or possible the Reformation

a notion

obsessive self-identification is a coping mechanism
true selves don't exist and aren't a useful abstraction
"proving it" medically is a waste of time
if somebody wants to buy girl shit instead of boy shit and beg for validation on social media i don't have a problem with it
mtfs should probably stop trying to "recruit" and stop trying to coerce lesbians for sex if they want a wider acceptance by society
fuck pseudtube
fuck pseudtubers
fuck oliver thorn
fuck harris brewis
fuck "natalie parrott"
fuck "nigs land" stop spamming my website twerp
i'm your dad
joker's trick

>I joined House Attack Helicopter

Attached: HousesOfHogwarts.jpg (500x292, 36K)

Attached: Screenshot_20181222-193399_Twitter.png (734x949, 139K)

One of the 700 people she “follows” on the Twitter account run by her P.R. Team said something bad about trans people so this is somehow her fault and all the little leftist “bloggers” are just pissing themselves in rage over it.

Imagine being this bored.

>it was applauded and embraced by wokedom
Black Hermione definitely wasn't. There may have been a bit of an attempt by "influencers" very early on, but it just seemed ridiculous to everyone trying to retcon that. I think it would have been smarter on her part to say "Why not cast a black actress as Hermione?" which makes more sense.

Gay Dumbledore came in a bit earlier than "wokedom" shit, the reaction to that was a bit "really?", I don't think anyone really cared that much.

>>africa is far right
>>so are arabs and asia
One is seeing what one desperately wants to see.

>even implicit endorsement of homosexuality
It's about philosophy, the most homosexual of the academics.

what the christchurch shooting shit is this?

Attached: 2.png (408x402, 169K)

From what I gather she has several (more than one) billion dollars. She's beyond canceling. If anything she does the canceling. If some peasant on Twitter criticized me and I was in her shoes, it wouldn't end up with me canceled.

Stop giving random people on Twitter power.

>that cringy sycophantic "Ouch! Is this the struggle you must bravely endure each and every day, milady? My queen? I, as a mere man, could never endure this, and yet you must! Woof! Jeez! Your courage in the face of endless twitter adversity is truly admirable, my empress!" party-line towing from nu-left liberal men, who somehow actually think their kowtowing is subtle

Why does seeing a man be a little bootlicking faggot offend me so much

It's also obviously not the struggle they must endure every day.

>philosophy tube
*gets utterly exposed and raped by le indo european man*

Maybe you should give it a try user :)

>leftists are starting to eat their own
Glorious
This is the future you wanted

Attached: FB_IMG_1559054600813.jpg (360x360, 7K)

Why does Philosophy Tube guy always look bloated and red-faced?

Perennial comment of an ideologically bound idiot.

>leftists
You know, people expect visitors of this board to have read something, not even necessarily a book, before posting on Yea Forums. Just something.

Attached: 31df11c5.jpg (710x887, 130K)

Did you just learn those words big boy?

>t. Leftist
Are you implying that JK Rowling is not a leftist? Lol

The perennial comment of the baby cocked.

Probably AIDS from all the gay nigger cum in his anus

She's literally as fucking liberal as they go.

She's centrist. Arguably right of center on economics depending on where you draw the line.

So liberal=left is a very US thing.

This is trolling right?

Its also the literal definition of left wing

Attached: 1544230483817.png (250x418, 129K)

Attached: a13.png (531x376, 283K)

You can be a capitalist and still be a leftist you fucking moron
Socialists are a minority among leftists in actual fact

>Its also the literal definition of left wing
In the US...

You're very focused on the top down approach to things like economic justice and the rights of various groups (workers' rights, women's rights etc), but that tends to put the power in the hands either of the government (not really liberal in any reading of the classical sense) or of rich people/industrialists which is then given out of kindness or charity or whatever. You have no real labour movement representation in your political system which is more typically the thing that defines left vs right everywhere else.

tl;dr You're wrong.

Did I win some fucking lottery being born as a "cisgender" straight white guy?

Idiot. Liberalism is a center-right ideology. Even when focusing on social liberalism alone, it's feel-good centrism that doesn't seek to change the larger status-quo. Beyond, of course, wanking about having more women and minorities represented in neo-imperialist organizations like the CIA or some corporate machine.

Attached: x3h.jpg (461x389, 47K)

>In the US
No that is the literal definition of left wing going back to the invention of the term.

Depending on where you draw the line m80. She's very New Labour, which - to translate for you - means very pro free market type solutions even where it can adversely impact workers. It's not clearly left or right however you look at it.

You're wrong.

>nothing has changed in centuries
youtube.com/watch?v=XkY88kvkdvU

Attached: clegginator.jpg (1500x1000, 79K)

>The political terms "Left" and "Right" were coined during the French Revolution (1789–1799), referring to the seating arrangement in the French Estates General: those who sat on the left generally opposed the Monarchy and supported the revolution, including the creation of a republic and secularization.

>Idiot. Liberalism is a center-right ideology.
HAHAHAHAHA
>"Modern liberalism occupies the left-of-center in the traditional political spectrum"

Very little
Socialism is far left, the regular left wing are liberals and usually state capitalist. The modern right are similar to the classical left, they support democracy but reject other enlightenment principles. The far right are the classical right, completely opposed to liberalism. The implication that liberalism is anything other than left wing or centrist is fucking hilarious.

>The political terms "Left" and "Right" were coined during the French Revolution (1789–1799), referring to the seating arrangement in the French Estates General: those who sat on the left generally opposed the Monarchy and supported the revolution, including the creation of a republic and secularization.
Which is (you might appreciate the meta-irony) republicans. Republicans are the original left.

Why is everything ecenomics to you? Economics play a very small role in determining what is left or right
I dont give a shit what she thinks about the economy, she is still a massive and very vocal leftist

>The implication that liberalism is anything other than left wing or centrist is fucking hilarious.
It's only hilarious if you don't understand the term or much of anything.

>Economics play a very small role in determining what is left or right
Welcome time traveler from the 18th Century.

The Republicans in the US are leftists, nothing about them is right wing traditionally or in the modern sense. They are usually Christian, thats about it.
They are only considered right wing within their own borders because they are ever so slightly more conservative than the Democrats, and left/right does essentially just boil down to two sides of the current debate. To someone who is right wing, even being associated with Republicans feels like a joke.

I quoted wikipedia so if you have a better definition go edit the page

Well according to Socialists anything left of absolute Marxism is right wing as proven by this thread, so its kind if a pointless distinction to make

>The Republicans in the US are leftists
Do you have brain damage? The "left" in america is right wing the rest of the world.

Anything right* of absolute Marxism
Look what you're doing to me

The "rest of the world" (aka Europe) is just really, really left then, you dumb shit.

Attached: Charles II.jpg (900x750, 35K)

>The "left" in america is right wing the rest of the world.
I bet you're American
Nobody else would be this tremendously retarded

Apply that image to yourself Mr "JK Rowling is right wing"

>majority of yurop is far right

What the fuck are you talking about? Name one country with far right leadership in western Europe.

>africa is far right

Unless you assume all dictatorship to be far right, you are wrong again

>so are arabs and asia

Same question

>headscarf
>(((weiss)))

No, that's accurate. The US has always had a bit of an issue with being to the right, it sort of pulled back after WWII but then generally went the other way again after the assassination of JFK and the effect that had on the Democrats. So pretty darn right.

The rest of the world thinks you're retarded.
Remember that time when Ben Shapiro came on BBC and called Andrew Neil a "leftist", the man who was the editor of The Times, Rupert Murdoch's newspaper?

>What the fuck are you talking about? Name one country with far right leadership in western Europe.
...the UK still hasn't done Brexit...

"Rest of the world" here
Your Republican party are a bunch of pussy leftists

>Americans thinking they aren't loud, obnoxious and obvious even on an anonymous Mongolian basket-weaving forum
To give a little context, you're from a country where the closest thing to socialised anything is for people that joined the fucking military. That is very much right wing, and that's your center.

>
>The rest of the world thinks you're retarded.
I'm not American retard
>the man who was the editor of The Times, Rupert Murdoch's newspaper?
And?
Do you think by virtue of working for a rich guy you become a right winger? Are you fucking mental? Literally every official media outlet is leftist, all of them, and all the journos are even worse, many of them self proclaimed socialists (as they directly benefit off capitalism)
Leftists like yourself live in a literal fantasy land where the right wingers are out to get you everywhere
They are NO true right wing parties anywhere in the western world today, and any that try to form get locked up or die under mysterious circumstances, meanwhile you had a self proclaimed socialist run for president in 2016. Let that sink in.

Why do you keep saying I'm American? I'm from Australia and our left wing party are further right on most issues than the American Republican party. The only differences are gun control really, but only retards support the 2nd amendment.

Andrew Neil is through and through right wing, he's unapologetic about it. If in your political context he's left wing, then the center is somewhere around Evola.

Aussie Labor are not right of the Republicans you chucklehead. What has Fox News been telling you?

>Do you think by virtue of working for a rich guy you become a right winger?

Do you understand what a newspaper is? Do you understand who Murdoch is? Do you know who Andrew Neil is?

>meanwhile you had a self proclaimed socialist run for president in 2016
>President of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
I didn't think Corbyn went that far, pretty sure we would be keeping the monarchy regardless.

Translate in normal English

Why do faggots always subscribe to authorian speech on issues at hand?

Protip: these are rhetorical questions.

I don't know anything about this Andrew Neil but I will bet money he isnt right wing.

I meant the Liberals
The Labour party used to be even further right of Liberals, only since Rudd have they become this fringe extremist lefty weirdo party, part of the reason nobody votes for them.

>Do you understand who Murdoch is? Do you know who Andrew Neil is?
A couple of globalist leftists?
I dont know this Andrew fag but I know Murdoch, he's a giant leftist kike

Was talking about Boinie Sandas

Sanders didn't get to run for President.

>The Labour party used to be even further right of Liberals, only since Rudd have they become this fringe extremist lefty weirdo party, part of the reason nobody votes for them.
Really bad understanding of Aussie politics, as expected of a Foxy Americock.

Who hufflepuff here?

Attached: 44vf9jf1xjky.png (604x516, 88K)

>Sanders didn't get to run for President.
Huh? He ran against Hillary.

>Really bad understanding of Aussie politics, as expected of a Foxy Americock.
I can tell you're very young since you dont remember that the Labour party used to be a Nationalist party before Rudd.

Seriously, who the fuck chooses Hufflepuff? Are you a fucking furry?

Protip: Capitalism =/= Right Wing
Stop ignoring social politics you fucking troglodyte

So to explain your own political system to you, he ran a campaign for the Democrats' nomination which didn't work out, then he didn't run as an independent. So at no point did he run for pres.

I don't know what bs you've read around Australian politics but I'll just tell you you've misunderstood something terribly.

Hufflepuff means coming to terms with your own gentleness and normieness.

Africans and Muslims are overwhelmingly conservative in terms of their views on gender and sex. They are willing to subordinate it in the face of a more pressing interest for them, which is why they'll vote for liberal parties in the West. But it becomes a question then of "Will their voting liberal outweigh their liberalization as participants in Western society" or "will as soon as they have sufficient power they reverse the progressivism and start voting in line with their conservatism?"

Also, GLAAD or some such found a decrease in the amount of tolerance and support for LGBT recently. To not get a janitor on my ass just google
>GLAAD tolerance
and you should see the leading hits. Some of this is inevitable conservatism as you get older but this also involves the 18-34 demographic (who may have kids but not as many as older ones) dropping support by 10%. And women doing so more than men.

>he's a giant leftist kike
>Murdoch

How does you retarded scale of left and right even work? You have to be american.

The hat thing gave it to me I didn't choose it I've never even read Harry Potter all my knowledge of it is secondhand

>Africans and Muslims are overwhelmingly conservative in terms of their views on gender and sex.
It depends on what you mean by such things, but even in very right wing Muslim countries there are some crazy cross gender things going on that have been a part of the culture for a long long time. It's stupid to try to use those specific issues as your touchstones.

Not him, but I always held a notion that Hufflepuff has the largest amount of thick pale milky bitches for some reason. I'd choose it for that alone.

Attached: 12.jpg (1067x1600, 384K)

Man, you must be mixing with some shy but low-key freaks for Hufflepuff to be your go to.

>So to explain your own political system to you, he ran a campaign for the Democrats' nomination which didn't work out, then he didn't run as an independent. So at no point did he run for pres.
From Wikipedia: "Sanders ran unsuccessfully for the 2016 Democratic nomination for president"

>I don't know what bs you've read around Australian politics but I'll just tell you you've misunderstood something terribly.
I didnt "read" anything I was around to see it
Do you know who Bob Hawke and Mark Latham are? Lol

Sander's ideas are laughed at by every single media outlet in this country, and he was presented from getting anywhere near the White House by the same.

Would you be best off going into the same house or a different house? I feel like the same house it'd be more like you become family, and you'd get 'you're like a brother'-zoned.

*with breeding fetish, I forgot to add.

Attached: 4.jpg (1067x1600, 245K)

How does yours? Serious question I want to hear it because it makes no sense to me
It seems like your definition of right wing is "people I dislike"

I know he's a joke I was just making th point that socialism is totally normal and accepted today, where as traditional right wing views are non-existent

>"Sanders ran unsuccessfully for the 2016 Democratic nomination for president"
So you might notice that that is different to running for president.

>I didnt "read" anything I was around to see it
You seed it on the Fox News eh Cleetus?

>you seed it
This is a literature board user.
You also didnt answer my question, and its clear you're far too young to remember Bob Hawke or Mark Latham.

stop i already fapped

>It seems like your definition of right wing is "people I dislike"
Ah, so I see what this is now. You're going to try and seed confusion through the Aussie bloke sock puppet with this slightly off character but vague comment.

Murdoch and Andrew Neil are not left wing by any measure, and no not everybody you don't like or disagree with (i.e. all of the media apparently) is on the left. Yes you are by and large sounding like a right wing American for some crazy reason.

I don't know what I am doing

>we live in a society

>>It seems like your definition of right wing is "people I dislike"
>Ah, so I see what this is now. You're going to try and seed confusion through the Aussie bloke sock puppet with this slightly off character but vague comment.
Thats a great adhom but you didn't answer my question

>Murdoch and Andrew Neil are not left wing by any measure
I'm still waiting for you to substantiate this claim

>and no not everybody you don't like or disagree with (i.e. all of the media apparently) is on the left.
I'm well aware, I hate pretty much every politician in modern government. I'm just pointing out that you're objectively and empirically wrong.
>Yes you are by and large sounding like a right wing American for some crazy reason.
I'm right wing, traditionally, but not American. As I have stated probably 3 or more times now. I hate Americans and I wish that entire land mass was nuked off the face of the planet.

You're sure as shit a retarded leftist though and you'll get put against the wall someday.

Oh and also yeah 99% of everyone in the media is a leftist, and I'd safely assume 80% of them are jewish too

>but not American
Cool story bro.

Damn

No, same house for sure. They seem to date inter-house more commonly before moving on to exploring other houses, probably just do to most of their day being taken up classes and then there being a curfew so you’d wouldn’t have a lot of time to talk to other houses besides on the weekends or an unexpected free period. (Or if you’re sneaking about.)

Why do you care

He-shes spread their vileness

live by the sword, die by the sword. nice milkers though

the industrial revolution and its consequences

bro...

To you or anyone you know? Maybe you invented this problem

Only a tiny handful of retards on this board believe that only the only real leftists are communists.

>why would it upset you if hacked away at my genitals to achieve some divine illusion mass media is marketing to me?
I guess I’m just a really caring dude

Kills me hearing all these groups talking about how much of a struggle their life is, how they have to tiptoe around every situation, constantly be self aware and afraid.
Especially because it usually comes from blacks even though they report lower levels of stress, depression, suicide and even overestimate their own intelligence more than whites.

The rampant bullshit and double standards have really been getting to me recently anons.

it really be like that tho.

>Especially because it usually comes from blacks even though they report lower levels of stress, depression, suicide and even overestimate their own intelligence more than whites.

Blacks are more likely to die from stress-related illnesses than whites are. Also, mental illness is highly rampant in the black community, they just don't want to mention it because of Christfaggotry.

Stop spamming Yea Forums with the breadtube cancer

Rowling is a stupid cunt and so is everyone in OP's image.

They do it because whites have a history of capitulation in the face of it.
>Stress related illnesses
Might any of those also be McDonalds diet related illnesses?

>cunt who made her fortune pandering to special interests and tearing down other people, ridiculing them, and using her children's fairy tale to insert herself into politics gets torn down, ridiculed, and politically humiliated by the same people she once pandered to
oh no that sucks
can they do stephen king and john green next?

Attached: smug fluffy boy.jpg (944x1050, 150K)

agricultural revolution

MINGE

>I RTd this?
What does this mean? I doubt it's redtubing

Listen to Martin Sellner (Austrian Heideggerian activist)

old, but in a woke way

Modern day progressives are neither anti-autoritarian, nor, in turn Marxist. So no, she's not leftist without literally defining leftist in opposition to nationalism

John Green got a fair amount of flack for the Anne Frank thing in The Fault In Our Stars, I'm surprised he hasn't had so much for that toothpaste blowjob followed by pretty racist sex scene between minors in his first book something Alaska (I barely knew 'er).

This, based. Harry potter would be a decent childhood book franchise everyone remembers positively but she had to stretch out with her political bs

wtf I love Harrys Potters now

Based Joanne "Just Kidding" Rowling

wtf i love the dullest franchise now

What's she done now?

Our dear mommy overlord has financed the extermination of UK trannies by african mercenary groups.
based desu

>dude let's argue about the definition of group identifiers XD
do you faggots also claim the definition of feminist is "anyone who wants gender equality"?

the renaissance

user those are feminazis but wait nazis are acceptable now so those are sjws

They can't ever be satisfied. Give them an inch, and they'll complain why they weren't given a whole mile.

Hearty kek

Bruh

Attached: E8BEC796-1324-485A-ABD1-742114E58094.jpg (1365x2048, 616K)

shit son

Attached: 1522771333756.png (900x1042, 90K)

Democracy

Man's "development" of the intellect. Pre-intellect man lived in paradise, as notes. The illumination of the intellect, the light of the morning star, Lucifer, is the bringer of all worldly sorrow.

Attached: 1519075027981.png (1000x1091, 141K)

We’re just getting started, buddy

Good on you, user

You sound like a cool guy (unironically)

Idk, I like his channel and he makes great videos even if he's super far to the left compared to me, but I have to say, I'm pretty sure he has bipolar or some sort of mild personality disorder. He's mentioned depression, but aas I said, I suspect bipolar disorder or histrionic or borderline or some shit like that.

She's also antisemitic, just look at the goblins running the bank.

Extremely redpilled post

This is true. However, the most Yea Forumsworthy house is of course Ravenclaw. The housing process is quite ambiguous though, like the facet that Luna Lovegood was placed into Ravenclaw And Chadrick Diggery was placed into Hufflepuff.

Small brain: Multiculturalism destroyed the west
normal brain: Capitalism destroyed the west
big brain: The industrial revolution destroyed the west
cosmic brain: The enlightenment destroyed the west.

Harry Potter was a ghostwritten piece. It was not, could not, have been written by a single mother, fighting against adversity, writing her brilliant insights onto a napkin in a fucking coffee house.
Consider the following evidence in support of this theory:
>Many famous texts throughout history have been ghostwritten by literary societies and attributed to everyman (or woman) individuals to increase public interest
>Many of the characters in the book heed reference to established astrological symbolism, such as Sirius Black, an animagus whos animal for is a black dog, in reference to Sirrius, the brightest star in the night sky, known as the Dog Star.
>References to established historical figures related to the field of magic and the occult, such as Nicolas Flamel the famous alchemist.
>Colorful retelling of the ancient tale of Osiris and Isis.
>Osiris is murdered by Set (aka Typhon, the serpent), and Isis must give birth to her son, Horus in secret
>Horus (the hawk), achieving manhood, overthrows the tyrannical Set (the serpent)
>James Potter is murdered by Voldemort
>Harry, achieving manhood, overthrows Voldemort
>Voldemort's horcrux, Nagini is a giant serpent
Harry is of the house of Gryphondoor, the Gryphon
The list goes on and on and the symbology is saturated throughout the book. Only a person with a knowledge of occult symbolism (namely Masonic) and comparative mythology (such as Joseph Campbell) would have been able to write such a story. "Author" JK Rowling does not fit this description.

Attached: download.jpg (259x195, 8K)

transcendental brain: Kill niggers

JK Rowling studied classics in university, it's not unreasonable that she would have known this stuff

>tfw you put in a bunch of work
>...and one comment wrecks it

Attached: BadEnd.png (345x356, 179K)

Thank you for showing me this artist.

All those lazy allusions and references convince me even more that it was written by an unemployed single mother with way too much time on her hands.

200 messages about Rowling and nobody has posted the classics?
It really is summer...

The French revolution. Carlyle warned us.

based

Based and Christianpilled

Based and TendToYourOwnGardenPilled

Even Kant is """"""""problematic"""""""".

Attached: 1520620917694.png (468x345, 226K)

You expect me to have reading comprehension? Why do you think I'm on Yea Forums?

woke

Nice, quite Adornopilled

Just let them make their choices, it really doesn’t matter.

if only all christfag bantz were this humorous

Dude, not even God can cancel your soul.

Chaste and bread pilled

Attached: agnus dei.jpg (640x379, 41K)

>Breeding
>Fetish
user, that's literally what sex is for have some

imagine being so much of fag to consider Kant problematic

When they passed the windmill, meaning they no longer had time to slow Locomotive 131 down before it would plunge into the ravine.

>the overall well-being of society doesn't matter bro, just do you
shush

They're generally mad at her because she isn't a leftist.

Like the left is notorious for infighting but that's not what this is.

but it would cause me distress to see someone making themselves suffer- how could I call myself a decent and caring human if I didn't try to help my fellow humans?

We dont know but it may be more recent than we'd care to admit. Perhaps the collapsed margin isn't in our systems but within us.

>thinking like my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather did make me tres kewl

Attached: giphy.gif (400x293, 1.03M)

Well said

Pls no bully mommy Rowling
She’s retarded, yeas, but she’s /ourretard/

I don't care about trannies, they are the ones complaining about everything and insisting that I care.