Read his books

Read his books.

Attached: sowell1.png (1224x737, 500K)

read marx and burn all the neoliberal garbage

There’s no need.
Next you’ll tell us to read Billo’Reilly’s hot takes on history

>le wise black man who writes about le underperformance of le blacks

Attached: 3.jpg (600x600, 21K)

You wouldn't be responding to this thread if you didnt view Sowell as a threat, if you didnt recognize in the far recesses of your mind that the truth of his views wasn't a direct threat to the delusion you've adopted and defended with every fiber of your being. What are you doing? You're here every day, a vociferous chattering puppet for your "one-size-fits-all" ideology that explains away all the murky waters of the human experience, that you and you alone possess, that secret possession, the settled identity that justifies your life, your every action and thought. Rebut this as you see fit, but you and I both know what you're up to, and it's inglorious, resentful, and cowardly, and you are too far gone to look the truth in the face (here's where you scoff). And worse, your persistence has succeeded in giving this board a character, a personality, and it is the face of the loner, the egoist, the coward, the intelligent but unactualized adversary who has rejected the world in favor of a fantasy, a dream. Fuck you, because you know better, and you never did anything about it.

>the most fundamental fact is that they do not work
context needed, otherwise Hitchen's razor applies

Ironically racists love to suck this tool's dick just because he reaffirms their world view.

No shit. People like people who have their same belief systems.

He's a "socialism is when government does stuff"-tier retard. Even most of /pol/ lurkers are smarter than him.

Not an argument

The left keeps blacks down

Is he ever on college syllabi? never heard him come up in any of my classes.

>Is he ever on college syllabi? never heard him come up in any of my classes.
No. I took classes with all 3 non-econ conservative professors at the Ivy I went to, plus two of the economists, and he was not on any of their syllabi.

Good post. This fag who can’t even attain to the diction level of a 19th century peasant holds the key to truth.

I have been reading his work "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" or whatever the title is. It makes sense that thug culture should not be anything vital but entirely mimetic. In fact, such a culture, which Sowell argues originated at least with rednecks in the south and in the lawless parts of Britain, is not so much a culture as a closed system of mimesis, which never originates anythign but violence and depreciates all of the meritorious knowledge it inherits from civilized culture.

I had the thought today that racism is not really racism, which is to say that no one can really "hate" a race, and it is only those races who we are in conflict with over common objects of envy that we must take the time to insult. Everyone knows that niggers and crackers are the same thing, and that crackers are usually racist--so Sowell's hypothesis is not so hard to accept. There is definitely something subhuman about the chinese, however, but that is another matter.

He a nigger tho

Nice get by the way

His views are standard. Its just an annoying meme author you’re pushing on us to waste people’s precious time. I almost believe Exxon pays your NEETbux to keep people dumb. Almost
It doesn’t really matter. Capitalism is unsustainable. The US is going to sink faster and harder than the UK did real soon.

>one-size-fits-all
I’m not like that at all.

>mfw the author is a literal nigger

Attached: 1560504724900.jpg (208x249, 6K)

Checked
Dilate faggot

>literally has Billo’Rielly and Rush Limbaugh books in his collection

Is the standard unsustainable?

Thomas Sowell is just pop-economics. His views do not represent the consensus of mainstream, scholarly accepted positions within the economics profession. For example, yes, in a simplistic model you might learn in Econ. 101 to illustrate the usefulness of abstraction and models, a minimum wage hike leads to unemployment. But take any further advanced class, you'll learn how such a model is not complex enough compared to the numerous amounts of factors in reality, and Sowell conveniently never covers that except for strawmanning the hell out of what Keynesian economics believes in or represents. He's ideological trash, read basic economics. Actual basic economics, an introductory economics textbook.

>the consensus of mainstream, scholarly accepted positions within the economics profession

Attached: 860_main_Norovirus_tuft.png (860x460, 337K)

Standard behavior of capitalism is instability. There will be another crash and a another after that. And it’s burning right through the world’s resources and polluting it the point of causing a massive extinction event not seen since that asteroid. I would say so, yes.

Based and responsibilitypilled

In my dreams I torture and rape a huge cast of journalists, politicians, and academics. Economists are included.

Attached: freedom of the press.jpg (894x894, 224K)

So defend neoclassical economics, user. Vomit pics aren’t an argument. How is it that raising the minimum wage doesn’t lead to unemployment?

what? Sowell is one of the most respected Economists out there. He went to an ivy league school and is well respected in his field. Could you say the same about yourself? No. You just call him a retard because you're too fucking dumb to actually argue the point.

Don't read any American "conservatives", American politics is backwards.

He isn't, he has no publications of note and is mostly a polemicist and cultural commentator. There's nothing wrong with being a cultural commentator but he's not really relevant as an economist.

This, stick to holy scripture and destroy all works in the Index Librorum Prohibitorum that you find, for the sake of St. Marx.