Why can't women understand male friendship?

women don't understand loyalty, sacrifice, or anything other than the sensation of lying successfully and getting their snatch stuffed

They’re just horny

>For a woman, the highest and most intimate form of relationship is sexual.
lol fuck me... what about 'motherhood'?

It appears to me that women can't understand friendship at all.
At least that is what my experience with female group dynamics in school has taught me.

It seemed they were in a constant state of jealousy, only kept together by the anxiety of being alone.

What do you mean they don't understand it?
I've had friendships with women that were like ones I have with men.

Jews abolished that in the '90s

oh fuck, i need to call my mother and tell her ASAP

Modern women are actively fighting for abortion at any point in the pregnancy up to birth.
Motherhood is dead.

Mate, motherhood is not dead. Do you seriously expect me to believe it takes one narcissistic dumbfuck generation to dismantle motherhood? There's just no way. Have some hope.

I want to know what it's like to have brothers...

Attached: 1539744872780.png (800x450, 641K)

if you ever have you're either gay or bi, spend some time thinking about it

this but unironically
women don't understand male relationships because they don't understand the values that lay the foundation for them - honor, loyalty, and other masculine virtues, which is why they just insert sexual connotations instead

It took maybe two generations to dismantle the traditional family. Unless there's a drastic change in public opinion over the next couple years, motherhood as we define it will be a thing of the past

I don't buy it. Motherhood is a societal peg in the ground we are not to be rid of, something we are bound to and unable to move too far away from. The role of the mother will never be abandoned by society so long as mothers are attached to their children; so long as father's care about their daughters who become mothers, mothers will be protected, and encouraged. If there exists today an aversion to young women regarding motherhood, and they are choosing not to become mothers, it is either because they believe that the world is going to end in catastrophe within the next century, or because they want to take advantage of the wealth of the West while they are young, and so delay motherhood until such a time as they are ready. So as far as that is concerned, I would say this is not an eternal situation, but a temporary one. For all we know, there could be a population boom by the end of the next decade when a whole generation of grown women decide the time is right to have children. I would say as youth gets spent parenthood becomes more enticing, and as the emptiness of sensory experience becomes apparent we long for something more meaningful to justify our lives. I have recently started noticing how delightful children actually are to be around, and started longing for my own. I shared my sentiments with my friend, and he told me he felt the same. We were both surprised we could feel this way.

To decide on the weight your argument has on this subject: are you a man or a woman?

man.

I would say you would believe my argument would have less weight seeing as I am a man, and I can appreciate that. However, seeing as a woman would be unlikely to voluntarily have children without a partner willing to commit to them, I would say that the continuation of motherhood depends somewhat on the attitudes of men relating to children. If I were a woman stating my argument, how much weight would my argument have if I could not account for the change in attitudes of men that become willing to father children? If I was a woman, I could not account for that. I am a man, and so cannot as properly account for women as you would like, I assume, but can at least account for my half. But whether or not my argument is light or heavy despite, we will not know unless you test it with a wind.