How would you respond?
How would you respond?
James Turner
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Carter Miller
I mean a scientific positivist would just say "Yes" and move on.
This doesn't even stump anyone who would actually say that, are you retarded op?
Jeremiah Campbell
yeah nigger, now show me that scientific proof
Brody Campbell
He’d be guilty of circular reasoning user
Adam Ramirez
based
Luis Rivera
Of what specifically?
The existence of truth? That is either an irrelevant question ("Ultimate truth" is, to borrow a term, a "Spook") or self evidently true (Things can be wrong or they can be right, by definition).
You're not stumping scientific positivism with this sophistry.
Jaxson Perez
If science is not the only way to know truth, what are the other ways?
Sebastian Williams
The people who say this sort of thing usually are the ones who think science is some kind of doctrine, instead of a method, and they get mad when you point out that science is always changing. If you try to present them with a contradiction they will either blindly accept it or assume that some scientist already solved the problem for them.
Thomas Harris
>not knowing what the primitive notion is
You are so stupid it’s unbelievable
At least the theist knows he’s making a leap of faith. Whereas you don’t even understand what your beliefs come from
Charles Roberts
I am not myself a scientific positivist, and the fact that you aren't capable of even imagining that someone would be able to point out that your attacks on the philosophy are bad without having personal stake in it speaks volumes about you.