Nothing can compete

>And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

>With truth have We sent it down, and with truth hath it descended. And We have sent thee as naught else save a bearer of good tidings and a warner.

>And a Qur'an that We have divided, that thou mayst recite it unto mankind at intervals, and We have revealed it by revelation.

>Say: Believe therein or believe not, lo! those who were given knowledge before it, when it is read unto them, fall down prostrate on their faces, adoring,

>Saying: Glory to our Lord! Verily the promise of our Lord must be fulfilled.

>They fall down on their faces, weeping, and it increaseth humility in them.

>Say: Cry unto Allah, or cry unto the Beneficent, unto whichsoever ye cry . His are the most beautiful names. And thou, be not loud-voiced in thy worship nor yet silent therein, but follow a way between.

>And say: Praise be to Allah, Who hath not taken unto Himself a son, and Who hath no partner in the Sovereignty, nor hath He any protecting friend through dependence. And magnify Him with all magnificence.

Attached: D7duKHMXkAEaEBr.png (500x612, 48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=5&verse=82
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Buddy, you got your ass whooped in the pitfalls of trad thread.

Reminder that the Quran literally states Christians are not idolaters.

corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=5&verse=82

Because you guys hate music.

which part is good, exactly?

Some are, some aren't, bruh

The Bhagavad-Gita is better

>“Lord Shri Krishna said: This imperishable philosophy I taught to Viwaswana, the founder of the Sun dynasty, Viwaswana gave it to Manu the lawgiver, and Manu to King Ikshwaku!

>The Divine Kings knew it, for it was their tradition. Then, after a long time, at last it was forgotten.

>It is the same ancient Path that I have now revealed to thee, since thou are My devotee and My friend. It is the supreme Secret.

>Arjuna asked: My Lord! Viwaswana was born before Thee; how then canst Thou have revealed it to him?

>Lord Shri Krishna replied: I have been born again and again, from time to time; thou too,

>O Arjuna! My births are known to Me, but thou knowest not thine.

>I have no beginning. Though I am imperishable, as well as Lord of all that exists, yet by My own will and power do I manifest Myself.

>Whenever spirituality decays and materialism is rampant, then, O Arjuna, I reincarnate Myself! To protect the righteous, to destroy the wicked and to establish the kingdom of God, I am reborn from age to age.

>He who realises the divine truth concerning My birth and life is not born again; and when he leaves his body, he becomes one with Me.

>Many have merged their existences in Mine, being freed from desire, fear and anger, filled always with Me and purified by the illuminating flame of self-abnegation.

>Howsoever men try to worship Me, so do I welcome them. By whatever path they travel, it leads to Me at last.

>Those who look for success, worship the Powers; and in this world their actions bear immediate fruit.

>The four divisions of society (the wise, the soldier, the merchant, the labourer) were created by Me, according to the natural distribution of Qualities and instincts. I am the author of them, though I Myself do no action, and am changeless.

>My actions do not fetter Me, nor do I desire anything that they can bring. He who thus realises Me is not enslaved by action.

>In the light of wisdom, our ancestors, who sought deliverance, performed their acts. Act thou also, as did our fathers of old.

>What is action and what is inaction? It is a question which has bewildered the wise. But I will declare unto thee the philosophy of action, and knowing it, thou shalt be free from evil.

>It is necessary to consider what is right action, what is wrong action, and what is inaction, for mysterious is the law of action.

>He who can see inaction in action, and action in inaction, is the wisest among men. He is a saint, even though he still acts.

>The wise call him a sage, for whatever he undertakes is free from the motive of desire, and his deeds are purified by the fire of Wisdom.

>Having surrendered all claim to the results of his actions, always contented and independent, in reality he does nothing, even though he is apparently acting.

>Expecting nothing, his mind and personality controlled, without greed, doing bodily actions only; though he acts, yet he remains untainted.

Attached: 128-lord-krishna.jpg (768x1118, 225K)

Is this a pro-Islam thread or an anti-Islam thread? The prose is shit, is the OP meant to be ironic or something?

Because *you* want it that way. The literal word of God says otherwise.

Christians, Jews, polytheists. Three (3) distinct categories.

It's meant to be pro-Islam. He's a tripfag who got owned in other threads and is now posting user.

Mika Waltari's book Mikael Hakim nearly converted me to Islam. It seems a pretty chill and comfy religion when you don't deliberately shit on it.

What are you talking about?

Islam isn't even a religion. It's just a thinly veiled excuse try to take over the world with murder and rape.

Read your Quran.
See
Christians cannot possibly be idolaters since they are clearly separated from that category.

Some Christians practice idolatry but not all, those who don't go to paradise

Ah, one of those famous abrogations.

???? Abrogation only applies to commandments

The Quran isn't referring to the famous Jehovah;s Witness sect of Christianity, so present in Arabia around the time of Muhammad. It's literally talking about trinitarians and its separating them from the polytheists.

Christians are not polytheists according to this passage in the Quran.

No one believes your Talmudic mental gymnastics. Your dawah is shit. Step up.

Redpill me on the benefits of drinking cow piss.

Camel and gives you relaxation I guess.

You could make this argument for most religions. Also Muhammad was significantly less rapey than his contemporaries so it's very hard to accuse him of this at least.

But his contemporaries didn't claim to have a direct line to God, nor did their followers claim that they were perfect moral examples, across all time, while the books that recorded their lives were not only the revealed word of god, but his actual verbatim speech, leaving even less situational latitude for raping 9 year olds. If Jim next door claimed the same shit, he'd probably get more shit from the international community as well.

The 9 year old thing that Muhammad is held to scrutiny for is something I really don't understand. It was the 7th century where most people had no chance for formal education so getting married early was never a real taboo. Even Judaism allows for extremely young marriages which Christianity never seems to contradict. Plus he got explicit permission from both the father(his best friend) and Aisha(who was post puberty at the time too.)

You seem to have missed the part where I said
>But his contemporaries didn't claim to have a direct line to God, nor did their followers claim that they were perfect moral examples, across all time, while the books that recorded their lives were not only the revealed word of god, but his actual verbatim speech, leaving even less situational latitude for raping 9 year olds. If Jim next door claimed the same shit, he'd probably get more shit from the international community as well.
You also seem to be under the impression that I am a Jew, or a Christian, or that I want to defend the moral philosophies embedded in those tradition.You also seem to be under the impression that even if I was, 'whataboutism' is a relevant argument.