Any books that argue against biological determinism? I'm really feeling down because my ancestors were farmers

Any books that argue against biological determinism? I'm really feeling down because my ancestors were farmers.

Attached: IMG_1739.jpg (1366x1363, 798K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Biological_determinism
rationalwiki.
vocaroo.com/i/s1cT7WxtGzjC
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Mine too. I wish I could be a farmer. I can smell when the rain's coming. But it's like a parlor trick, useless.

>jacque tati poster
ARRGHGHGHGH

Biohistory might interest you. It's still biological determinism of sorts, but it involves the epigenetic responses to early childhood conditions.

basic philosophy to argue about determinism in the first place which is utterly retarded and one layer of the scientific slave master mentality.
People really thing the plebs were given the evolution mindset for anything other than to make themself feel worthless and defeated as this mindset works in favour of the strong and powerful. (social Darwinism in action)

Everyone's ancestors were farmers

If your ancestors were peasant farmers you wouldn't have scrawny arms.

What

I'm 2-3 generations separated away from farmers though. All of my grandparents with the exception of my paternal grandmother were farmers who were given homes in the city under Krushchev's reforms. My mother became a translator and my father a failed businessman turned handyman. No one in my family went to university.

How does this even work in the first place. IF there is biological determisnm at work, then how did one human rise above the other? Was one humans dna "better" than the other human dna? How come?
Did we have engineers from the beginning of society or what? Scientists know a lot less than they pretend to do. The differences had to evolve and it most likely has to do with enough nutrients for proper development through generations not some mystical differences in human dna.
If something like biological determinism has the ability to depress yourself, than it is working as intended: keeping the plebejan masses on their tracks:

>Was one humans dna "better" than the other human dna? How come?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection

How the hell is biological determinism depressing? It just is.

Biological determinism is pretty much abandoned by scientist rationalwiki.org/wiki/Biological_determinism

Lmao you're a minority aren't you?

Nothing wrong with being a farmer, user. Nor does it mean you can't be literary. Thoreau wrote Walden in the middle of a heavy span of bean farming, after all... many such cases.

lol
basic common sense.
And who the fuck are these people sourcing rationalwiki? Fucking ASSfags are swarming this place, and they're worse than the trannies.

Attached: 1527000795310.jpg (1024x510, 72K)

>tfw my ancestors were noblemen and wealthy aristocrats

Attached: 1554423325633.jpg (392x331, 25K)

>rationalwiki.
are you being serious?

I see everyone complain that rationalwiki is shit, but no one can make a counter argument against it.

You've never known twins have you?

lmao

Attached: 1524526587231.jpg (300x168, 9K)

If you actually browse rationalwiki Im not even going to speak to you

Bill Nye is a hack though.
But rationalwiki does a good job handling crackpot conspiracies, holocaust denial, and tankie revisionism.

>mfw anons feel smarter than others for believing in a far right conspiracy theory
Ahahahahahahahahahahahaaahahhaahahahahhahahhahahahahhaahhahahhahahahhahahahah

Attached: 34C3BFA4-EA96-4CCE-8A04-58EE983BC14F.gif (498x382, 350K)

who cares, my ancestors were all shepherds, sailors, and criminals, you don't see me making shitty threads

What kind of asshole cant smell the rain coming?

your mother is probably very smart

>social Darwinism
lol

>rationalwiki does a good job handling crackpot conspiracies, holocaust denial, and tankie revisionism.
nah they have a pretty clear neoliberal slant

King Lear
>This is the excellent foppery of the world, that, when we are sick in fortune, often the surfeit of our own behaviour, we make guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars; as if we were villains on necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and treachers by spherical pre-dominance; drunkards, liars, and adulterers by an enforc’d obedience of planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting on. An admirable evasion of whore-master man, to lay his goatish disposition to the charge of a star! My father compounded with my mother under the Dragon’s Tail, and my nativity was under Ursa Major, so that it follows I am rough and lecherous. Fut! I should have been that I am, had the maidenliest star in the firmament twinkled on my bastardising.

peasants are despicable

Any of Camus/Nietzsche would work. Both are about fighting against apparent meaninglessness and chaos by both accepting/submitting to the concept of meaninglessness while acknowledging that they could still rise above it.

If you're down, just remember that in the question of anything being absolute--for example, biological determinism--it either is or it isn't. If it is absolute, then no point in worrying about it That'd be like worrying if the sun was going to come up--totally out of your control.

If it isn't absolute, then you're worrying over nothing. Don't sweat it, bro. You're gonna be fine.

Attached: 1557792127251.jpg (782x1012, 144K)

Read Stoner you farming bitch

You’re a Brazilian communist

I'll hang your family from an overpass and flay you in the streets faggot. We'll have a ticker-tape parade with the greasy strips of what used to be your bonesleeves.

>my ancestors were farmers

pffffff HAHAHA hey farm boy go shuffle up some cow shit Hahahaha

And? The mother of my father grew up on a farm which she had to leave early due to historical circumstances, he still got a university degree and quite a good Job.

>But rationalwiki does a good job handling crackpot conspiracies, holocaust denial, and tankie revisionism.
Metapedia is about as balanced and true on these topics.

I thought they accepted things like evolution? Or is rationalwiki run by creationists?

>No one in my family went to university.
how is this a bad thing? many capable and great men lacked formal education

Minority in terms of ethnicity? Definitely not. Minority in terms of questioning the cult of sciencetism. I think so.
You are probably an anglo who treats white as a race.

If biological determinism would have been true how come the nobility of europe was BTFO'd and became poor so quickly?

Marcello?

white is a race, like asian is a race, like niggers are a race. they're called caucasoids (europeans, middle easterners, indians, north africans), mongoloids (asians), and negroids (sub saharan africans)

if rational wiki says so, then it must be.
Amen.

>le white man face

Attached: images.jpg (518x592, 26K)

definitely a subhuman negroid, not a mediterrenean.

they are classifications in anthropology

Try reading Steven pinker, he argues against a lot of that

The major races are more accurately sub species. Negroids don't even have the same reproductive patterns as everyone else and significantly less prefrontal cortex development.

Jesus christ

Just question the epistemological foundation of those assumptions, read german idealism.

Seems like most writers I read about come from great families or at least were university educated themselves

vocaroo.com/i/s1cT7WxtGzjC

You forgot melanasians and polynesians.

Attached: Screenshot_20190610-125647~2.png (720x506, 86K)

This is barely a step above being a tripfag.

>rational wiki