Can creativity exist under fascism?
>what are some books on this subject disclaimer
Can creativity exist under fascism?
Dylan Baker
Jack Cook
IT SEEMS LIKE YOU ARE MUTUALLY CONFLATING NATIONALSOCIALISM, AND FASCISM; IF SO, YOU ARE IN ERROR.
Jonathan Allen
You must be not be aware of the urban centers Hilter himself had envisioned
Everybody wants fascism. The left want it most of all.
Asher Parker
There were German films made under the regime you could watch
Of course in a pluralistic society there is more range for creativity at least in the past; creators don't have to worry whether their film corresponds to the socialist or nationalist or communist agenda of their respective states and societies. The USSR came up with some kino films after the war and the bulk of the strife so I don't see why an NSDAP controlled Germany couldn't assuming it survived somehow, I even think it'd have greater potential considering the theatric nature of the Reich and the propensity for romanticism. Film is a more appropriate form of art for these ideologically totalitarian societies though, literature might find it more difficult to conform and still maintain its worth. What great writers did the USSR produce? None of note I know of, the only Russian writers of its existence were the ones who fled from it like Nabakov, or Solzhenitsyn who had to publish all but one (admittedly one of his best) works outside in the West.
Carson Cox
No it does not seem like that since Hitler was both.
Also to answer OP's question: Only to a small degree.
Also read Doctor Faustus by Thomas Mann. It is made by an artist disliked by the nazis about an artist making a deal with satan, an allegory on the things that happened to the German people.
It may be interesting since many artists made such pacts. Look at people like Gustaf Gründgens (Maybe rrad Mephisto, a book written by another Mann) and Richard Strauss who "pacted with the devil".
Easton Lopez
Creativity can ONLY exist under fascism
James Harris
NATIONALSOCIALISM, AND FASCISM, ARE TWO MUTUALLY DIFFERENT IDEOLOGIES THAT ARE DISTINCT IN THEMSELVES, AND NEITHER ONE DERIVES FROM, NOR IS COMPREHENDED BY, THE OTHER.
Christian Sanders
Nazism is a subset of fascism you fucking retard. Hitler literally modeled his movement on Mussolini's. Fascism is a term that's used to describe the palingenetic ultranationalist movements of the 20th century, most scholars use this definition, and fascist themselves did, whether they were aware of it or not.
This is literally just an argument of semantics of what the definition of fascism should be, not whether the movements I recalled formed part of a common creed.
Parker Robinson
No.
National Socialism is a relatively clear defined ideology.
Fascism is relatively losely defined. You can just call nationalistic, militaristic dictatorships fascist. National socialism can and did exist in a fascist system.
Jordan Reyes
>You can just call nationalistic, militaristic dictatorships fascist
Wrong this is why Francoist Spain or Peronist Argentina are not considered fascist. Fascist requires synthesis of totalitariansm, ultranationalism and palingenesis.