Pick an author to remove from history

Pick an author to remove from history

Attached: 1547264835628.jpg (320x512, 28K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=__V3nDYgY7U
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Trump.

/thread

God.

Attached: index.jpg (275x183, 7K)

Marx

Rousseau. A huge amount of people still believe his bullshit about the noble savage and the natural goodness of man.

Homer just to see how we would turn out to be now.

Ayn Rand

How could you do that to friend Homer?

The cro-magnon that composed pic rel

Attached: grug.jpg (474x310, 39K)

This, fuck y’all racist asses

Came to post. There's no more *cringe* autobiographical writing than Confessions, nor positively obnoxious novel than Julie, or Nouvelle H.

Me desu

America would be good if it weren't for Rand.

Dostoevsky, he's pretty great but people really need to stop talking about him so much.

Unironically Flaubert

Dostoievsky

as if you could predict what the world would be like without him

Nabokov.
End the Lolita shitposting.

Attached: nabokov.jpg (500x626, 56K)

Anonymous.

Salinger

Adolf Hitler.

Stephanie Meyer

J.K. Rowling. Harry Potter is the root of all YA horseshit

The only good answer thus far

I second this

Luther

I want to see a world without Tolkien.

George R. R. Martin

best answer

Brecht
Joyce
Sartre
Baldwin

I’d have to spin a wheel to decide which one.

I can
Someone else would have come up with the idea

James Patterson.

J.K. Rowling

Good pick.

This

The author of your diary.

Pessoa. I don't want incels to feel validated.

>remove entire author from history because his fans are slightly irritating
I mean even if you're going to do that, is Dost /really/ the author with the worst fans?

This brainlet, Nietzsche otherwise.

Donna Tartt

St. paul and his bastardized translation of Christianity

Freud

Was Stephanie Meyer inspired in any meaningful way by the success of J.K. Rowling?

whoever wrote stargirl. we had to read that crap in school.

steinbeck

>no one has said John Green yet

Foucault
This power structure/struggle thing is so cynical and is present in all modern leftist dogma, and even in some rightist talking points too.
Wish it was never written bro.

outta my way, me first

Marx because it would eliminate all the pseuds that came after.

Imagine a world without Marx influencing pseud continentals? It'd be paradise.

obviously montaigne.

The Art of the Deal made literally zero impact on the world, Trump became popular because of The Apprentice, not because of some dumb ghostwritten book

if you actually cared about racism you could have said Lovecraft, but obviously this was a /pol/ false flag post

Die

We were waiting for u to green text him

Who is this chick. She’s kinda cute

NyanNyanCosplay
youtube.com/watch?v=__V3nDYgY7U

Luther

What the fuck do you have against Steinbeck you stupid cunt?

Someone else would've come along and made the same observations about money, commodities, exchange, labor, automation, property and ownership. Perhaps the marxist metanarrative and the theory of value may not have had the same aesthetic or political implementation, but similar events would have unfolded due to the accumulated tensions in political situations, independent of theory, and the distribution and acquisition of natural resources would have unfolded along similar lines. Popular revolution could have very well unfolded in Russia without the external ideology of Marx. Perhaps the revolution would have had a mere Socialist metanarrative, or an Egoist metanarrative. Either way a strict soviet hierarchy and police state would have emerged because the material conditions of trade and war necessitated such a structure.

Attached: DcOILg4XcAArYcy.jpg (543x261, 31K)

Plato, just to see what would be different

>Either way a strict soviet hierarchy and police state would have emerged because the material conditions of trade and war necessitated such a structure.
wildly unsupported claim

Multiple writers.
How about Paul? That ought to put a nice kink in history

Socialism would still exist.
Maybe have been a bigger success if Lenin’s gang hadn’t have diverted it so horribly.
Naw. Socialism might have taken root.

Attached: C03557DD-2CBA-4F5F-8E92-8C31AACFB5B4.jpg (580x897, 120K)

David Foster Wallace

Attached: IMG_20190609_195253.jpg (1000x1560, 202K)

ayn rand

>Joyce
Stop bullying Joyce, please.

>Sartre

Nigger what?

hit or miss

Norman Boutin

Attached: Dt-XTM6UwAEmIch.jpg (797x947, 94K)

Nabakov or Pope

Joyce. Not even hard.

>/threads himself
Actually let me revise my choice, I pick this user.

It's better to remove Engels, he was the one who bankrolled Marx's writing and was an equal tard ideologically.

>or an Egoist metanarrative
>Sankt Max becomes the motive force for dumb mongrels worldwide
This would have been amazing tb h

John Locke. There, you just solved 90% of the world's degeneracy.

myself

Ironic that this whole post is affected by the mistaken Marxist belief that history is predicated by material circumstances and the flow of events is thus inevitable.

Locke

Marx was a do nothing and a leech. It'd be better to get rid of Engels.

Hegel.

Fucking thank you

This

This might be the way to go. I thought Harry Potter was genuinely entertaining and harmless, but I think it's probably responsible for a lot of grossly substandard imitations.

St. John.

Mushroom prophecies are gay and have no place in the Biblical canon. The prophecies didn't come true, so now they're reinterpreted to say all kinds of dumb bullshit. Best to be rid of it and have the Bible end after the Gospels and Acts.

>Marxist belief that history is predicated by material circumstances and the flow of events is thus inevitable.

Marxism has this as a principle, but it is not a principle exclusive to Marxism.

You should be erased from history.

Plato. Fuck him. In the ass.

You ever notice all the female winners of non-celebrity Apprentice look like Ivanka? There was one old one, but all the others look like Ivanka.

Paul the Apostle, was a nasty sick cunt

easymode