Dabs on your metaphysical beliefs

i'm tired of this tekken character coming up on my main feed and i don't only say that because i've been watching a few tekken videos in my spare time while I eat and study german because really who the hell makes a post "dabs on your metaphysical beliefs" without even thinking to give the rest of the anons a kind of challenge oh yeah that's right i know who: the person who can't even conjure up a monicom of a semblance of a joke, question, worry WHY AM I HERE WHY AM I HERE WHY AM I HERE

the character is but a useful hyperstition like the lemurian time demons

>fighting against the dao
Yikes

>says this while he can't help but define certain processes/things/spirits/entities as good or evil
Sorry, but you won't ever get rid of all dualism, bud.

Attached: zarathustra02.jpg (589x851, 177K)

*dabs*

Attached: 961908A2-BCD7-43A3-825C-CC0BBD5CFCDC.gif (447x600, 209K)

yikes

Early Buddhism had a rudimentary kind of dualism. :>)

Fuck you my dog has Buddha nature

And that's why the three antidotes are encouraged over the three poisons. Three antidotes = good. Three poisons = bad. Dualism wins once again.

...

>he still desires a cure
If you meet the Buddha kill him

Nihilism is adharma.

Nihilism is dualism

Bro unless you can read Classical Chinese I doubt you understand any of his works. Pretty darn untranslatable and now only hippies and pseuds pretend to understand him

>language
>untranslatable

laughinggirls.jpeg

Nihilism is monist.

Tao de Ching has fine translations

Based mazdayana/zoroastrian shitposting, I hope it intensifies.

Not struggling
Acting without thinking
Same thing

>untranslatable
Maybe that's why a lot of translations specifically don't translate tao/dao, you goofball.

That wouldn't change anything. Stop being so caught up in things like these.

So how's the Zhuangzi?

he had virtually no influence on classical Hindu and Buddhist thought

Gautama, Siddhārtha. Dislike him. A cheap nihilist, insipid and foolhardy. A pied piper, pathological narcissist and a cloying moralist. Some of his modern disciples are extraordinarily amusing. Nobody takes his claims about remembering past lives seriously.
Majjhima Nikāya. His best work, though an obvious and shameless imitation of Yājñavalkya's "Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad"
Dīgha Nikāya. Dislike it intensely.
Dhammapada. Dislike it intensely. Ghastly rigmarole.

>Siddhartha was nihilist
Just say you don’t understand him man.

>Pali canon reflects Siddhartha’s thought

wrong pic op, you wanted Zhuangzi

>inner chapters
kino
>outer chapters
lame
>miscellaneous chapters
also lame but somehow still kino

Who is hungry?
Have you eaten?

Buddhists themselves don't even understand him which is why they argue incessantly between themselves over his teachings and those ascribed to him, it was sort of karma in a way that the rejection of tradition that Buddhism initially was would itself lead to intellectual anarchy and the near-total degeneration of the Buddhist tradition; a fitting result

Such as which? I feel like there are so many and so many chapter order rearrangements too. Which do people recommend?

Wash your bowl.

Plato would knee him in the gut so hard he'd die.

Lao-Tzu counts as nought, owing to the nature
of his doctrine.

Indeed he was Not.

65.1. The ancients who showed their skill in
practising the Tâo did so, not to enlighten the people,
but rather to make them simple and ignorant.
2. The difficulty in governing the people arises
from their having much knowledge. He who (tries to)
govern a state by his wisdom is a scourge to it; while he
who does not (try to) do so is a blessing

which is objectively the best thought

He is not a nihilist, you are incapable of understanding his teachings and your comments prove it

Hillaryous.

>Homer didn't even exist and the Iliad/Odyssey was just a compilation of texts formed over time. Absolute state of whites.