Why aren't women capable of greatness?

Why aren't women capable of greatness?

Attached: 1558864108693.jpg (240x240, 6K)

They need to give birth

good answer, you pass

Attached: C5551E52ADE142C1950642AE359A1D27.gif (220x220, 17K)

Because we don’t let them and we don’t want them to.

What great things have you achieved?

Dumb frogposters

why don't they stop men then

Attached: asd.webm (1636x868, 399K)

It’s called feminism and female quotas.

>dox yourself
wew lad

but feminism and female quotas are dependent on men allowing it still, so really men are uplifting women.

How do I take notes on my phone in business settings without looking like I'm playing candy crush. I don't want a laptop and p&p is too slow without being illegible.

— MARY, MOTHER OF JESUS.

— MARY MAGDALENE.

— SAINT KATHERINE OF ALEXANDRIA.

— SAINT JEANNE D'ARC.

— SAINT TERESA OF ÁVILA.

— LADY MALINALLI.

— BEATRIZ HERNÁNDEZ.

ET CETERA.

YOU ARE, EITHER: MISOGYNISTIC, OR IGNORE WHAT IS GREATNESS —OR, ALTERNATIVELY: BOTH.

Attached: S KTRN XVI.png (470x652, 582K)

they are
they can be great deceivers, great saboteurs, great manipulators, great instruments of ruin
they are one hundred times the deprecators and caluminators that men are, and have a near-mastery of it virtually from birth

i laugh when people say that women shouldn't be allowed in wars - given the chance and the proper incentive, they would eviscerate any enemy you can imagine and not leave so much as a trace behind. a woman would never do something so merciful as just kill someone who has wronged her - she would devise tortures unfit for even the stragecraft of your nightmares, and exact them in perfect sequence, over and over, until the way this Enemy saw itself is gone. what's more, being devoid of any moral impulse not grounded in social dictum, she would feel neither pity nor regret for any of it. they all deserved it - because she's GOOD, and everyone else is BAD.

unleash the women in 2019 and watch the planet turn to ash

Attached: clytemnestra.jpg (236x381, 19K)

based

they're far and few between, note the difference in IQ distributions between men and women. in a practical society we would acknowledge men and women have different uses, china is a lot better about this and has a majority female middle management.

queen boudica lost a fight against roman centurions that she heavily outnumbered and then killed herself. hilariously the speech she gave is extremely reminiscent of today's feminists, riling up her army about rape and stuff

Yikes, and cringe. Seriously, you're fucking idiotic; what are you even doing in the literature board?

k

Women arent meant to be anything, face the facts simp.

This. They are capable of it, but we're not letting them

Yea Forums - literature
incels fuck off

incels are a massive group that permeates all kinds

women are underrepresented in literature if you want to be board specific.

Men are more expendable and statistically will and are encouraged to take more risks which leads to wider variance but more "greatness" if by that you mean capabilities and intelligence. Women do achieve levels of greatness that surpass men, but at lower levels, and with less reported incidents due to cultural boundaries. Women are also very pretty, so they have value inherent in them while men must achieve that in the social realm.

why were cultural boundaries set up against women and not the other way around? why didn't women oppress men?