we are living in a era worse than 1984 - the nazi era where books are banned again.
You are only allowed to sell/print books if it's not offensive to leftists
jewishracism.blogspot.com
Welcome to 1984
Other urls found in this thread:
abcnews.go.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
If you think that Amazon removing the book (something we can argue about from a different point of view) equals real ban, you might be just another special touchy snowflake.
Can I get a summary of the controversy?
If you think that McDonalds removing certain races (something we can argue about from a different point of view) equals real ban, you might be just another special touchy snowflake.
You are allowed to print books but corporations are allowed to deny you their platform if they don't wanna be associated with far right racism. You can say that political views should be a protected class or that we should nationalise amazon but that's a totally different argument. In other words, stop being triggered snowflake.
Race is a protected class. Nazi is not. You can make the argument that it should be if you want but the analogy isn't apt.
>Not writing from a Palestinian pseudonym
Kek and Christ my witness, I shall teach them, my Goddess.
>Race is a protected class. Nazi is not.
Oh yes it is.
>You are only allowed to sell/print books if it's not offensive to leftists
You haven't been following the genealogy of this. They started removing books back in 2010 when conservatives got mad they were publishing rape manuals for pederasts
abcnews.go.com
> After defending sales of a self-published book on pedophilia, online retail giant Amazon last night reversed course and pulled the book from its Kindle store.
>The electronic book, "The Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure: a Child-lover's Code of Conduct," by Philip R. Greaves II, went on sale on Oct. 28 and cost $4.79 to download.
>"This is my attempt to make pedophile situations safer for those juveniles that find themselves involved in them, by establishing certain rules for these adults to follow," the author wrote in the product description. "I hope to achieve this by appealing to the better nature of pedosexuals, with hope that their doing so will result in less hatred and perhaps liter [sic] sentences should they ever be caught," Greaves said in the product description.
>The book quickly sparked a massive protest online, with thousands of Twitter users and Amazon customers calling for Amazon to remove the book, and some threatening to boycott the company altogether until it did.
First they come for the pedos, then the national socialists, it's always in this order
It isn't.
Why do people do this? The girls on the left would be attractive, and the right would probably be serviceable.
Books are not a race, you fucking discord trannie.
girls on the left are ugly mutts with big noses, only the one on the right would be serviceable
That's not how protected classes work. Amazon will not be able to deny somebody their platform on account of their being white or black because races are protected classes. However they CAN deny someone their platform on account of their being a Nazi, since political views are not a protected class.
Corporate hegemony extended, leftists cheer
>appealing to the status quo
It’s not about what they’re allowed to do, but what they should be allowed to do.
Because OP intentionally lied by saying that the book was banned and that this is proof of leftist hegemony or some bullshit. It's not. It's simply the decision of a corporation to disassociate themselves with the views of people that have led to the worst genocide in recent history. Now if you want to make the argument that Nazi should be a protected class you can do that. I would disagree because people can choose not to be a Nazi, but can't choose not to be a woman or a black or a white person.
Free-speech is protected speech.
They're all hot and you're an incel.
The left wins because of its girls. The right just has fake ass thots, at least these whores embrace their degeneracy.
Prove me wrong.
Free speech means the state is not able to censor you, not that companies aren't allowed to not host you on their platform if they find you to be financially damaging.