Which one is better?

Which one is better?

Attached: dialectic.png (424x299, 193K)

Left.

Kiek if only because of how many spergs Nietzsche attracts and having influenced french sodomites like Fucko and Bat-eye

One says pretend god is real

One says fuck that, be all that you can be and love life to it’s fullest.

You decide

Attached: 5C73AB02-31DF-4827-96ED-9B569F80D9B1.jpg (480x360, 16K)

You have no depth 2bh butterfly

EIN KUNTERBUNTES HAUS EIN AFFEN UND EIN PFERD

Kierk

She's right, though

DREI MAL DREI MACHT VIER

Bloomer vs Chadlarp

she's almost never right and when she is it's a really insipid and self indulgent insight

>she

Attached: nope.gif (414x382, 2.82M)

HOL MIR MAL NE FLASCHE BIER.

Kierkegaard is just a wannabe Nietzsche-lite with a christian twist

You only think this because you're wrong. Which is sad for you.

You too, closet-boy

>she

Uhhh

Kierk fans are normal people. No one with any familiarity of Kneetch's works beyond a ten minute YouTube video posted to reddit would consider themselves fans.

Nietzsche is not about love.

>highschool me
nietzche
>adult me
kirky

Nietzsche, because he actually saved god.

SONST STREIK ICH HIER

Attached: 1559009812927.png (1900x283, 110K)

I'm not as familiar with neetchi but what I enjoy about kirk is that he writes from several different perspectives depending on which book you read in order to force the reader to evaluate that way of thinking for themselves instead of spoon feeding them exactly what they need to think. His knight of faith archetype is very interesting to say the least.

>bat-eye

im a tard who is this referring to

Stop pretending to be a woman. Stop trying to steal out spaces you male creep. You are never going to be a woman.

Attached: how_to_identify_a_toxic_person.png (840x578, 316K)

Kierkegaard and Nietzsche are not necessarily at odds with one another. I would encourage all of you to read both and try and make it out as a converation, a dialectic, between the two. You might be surprised at what you might find.

Not every discussion needs to be agonistic. Try and explain what you're thinking and why your' thinking it. Then try to listen when the other person does the same.
Enough of your sophistry.

Can we agree that Kierkegaard is not a Christian? The only belief youd have to accept in order to get into his philosophy is that in the moment there is an infinite amount of possibilities

neetzshe

Fake

Sure he did, lobster boy.

Love of life, is what I wrote.

>regressing
Sad

Bendover you little slut

She is beautiful

Shut up

Lol Gotim

bataille

u reeeetard kierk is older