Was he right?

Was he right?

Attached: 71OsS+ePZFL.jpg (1400x2132, 238K)

Other urls found in this thread:

shaviro.com/Blog/?p=578
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

yes

no

He was wrong when he states zeno's paradox was solved simply by limit of infinite series

That's mostly correct

still struggling with that HS level math i see

he was wrong the moment his father conceived him with his angloid seed
he was wrong the moment he finally was laid beneath the angloid soil

he rejected his angloism. his philosophy is chink.

You gonna elaborate or just be a faggot?

>“Bertie thinks I am muddleheaded; but then I think he is simpleminded.”
he was based

Can you guys explain the concept of his "eternal object" to me? one thing I'm sure about is that they are very differ from conversation of the book, I seriously think it is same as plato's form. also I thought the concept of eternal object is very atomic, and filled with essentialism. it's like he thought the essence of "soup" is really exists, or certain color of "red" can be the essence of "red" when the fact in nature it is continuous.
Can you teach me where I'm wrong?

shaviro.com/Blog/?p=578

Literally, this is real, I'm reading it right now. even before you gave me the link.
Looks like I'm not the only one who uses google.
Please this seems to be not helpful

>you will never be young Bertrand Russell at a garden party before the decline of the British aristocracy
>you will never be torn reluctantly away from the logico-mathematical suppositions in your notebook by young revellers to play croquet
>you will never anxiously demonstrate your superior croquet skills to your flabbergasted peers
>you will never watch the hon. chonsey boddington-smythe awkwardly remove her bonnet and smile coquettishly at you while you desperately think of that obscurantist mystic Hegel to combat your growing arousal
>you will never have your arousal compounded by the Euclidean grace of the croquet mallet in motion
>you will never slip off into the bushes to brusquely but pleasantly deflower the hon. chonsey boddington-smythe
>you will never think of a highly cutting but ultimately polite rebuke to Hegel's mysticism mid-coitus
>the lucid glory of logic fills your mind as you reach orgasm
>tfw

Attached: bertie.jpg (187x250, 5K)

based deep cut

>Brainlets who don't understand the point of the paradox

Me somebody help?

sounds like hegel

Was helpful for me

so right at every moment inbetween?

It's not a paradox though

Define your term of "paradox".

I don’t know.

Chonsey is a girls name?