Well no wonder most people on Yea Forums are cynical assholes

imagine you are a marginalised person, say trans or a POC, and you are presented with two people, mind you you don't know anything about these two people except they are both white dudes, one of them is a hardcore harry potter fan while the other is an expert on plato. Who would you rather trust? As it is often the case with marginalised folks this could be a matter of life and death, who out of the two white dudes is least likely to be a murderous bigot and why?

This little thought experiment really helps one challenge the fundamental assumptions of the (eurocentric) literature snob. If classical literature doesn't make you a better person and might even make you a worse one, then what is even the point?

Attached: 1548206564295.webm (800x800, 2.49M)

To put it another way, kids who read Hairy Potter are grow up to be more easily exploited by the mainstream establishment, which makes them "better" so far as the establishment is concerned!

"Better people"= cucks

Attached: 1558276930929.png (597x418, 132K)

Even if this is satirical, it's easy to imagine the tranny would hang out with the harry poter reader. This doesn't speak to truth, wisdom, or anything worth caring about, however, and people should not feel obligated to be "inclusive"

Didn't we all read harry potter?

I read that shit and took years to undo the brainwashing from that and typical hollywood films.

You didn’t just read it for the story? You, as a child, gathered distinct morality and thought patterns from Harry Potter books? It took years to ‘undo’? Lol

I have a theory that the glorification of the historically repressed within this new youth generation is the fault of childhood disney film impressioning.

What the fuck is unreasonable about that

Pretty sure it's mostly women who read this fag shit and pretty sure women are more accepting of faggoty shit and I'm not nearly gay enough to care what a woman thinks.

So this hypothetical coloured person will be better able to exploit the Harry P. reader, but less able to take advantage of the Plato scholar. Q.E.D.

Attached: 1543622836425.jpg (653x590, 93K)

I didn't, except for the first book which I found to be boring as hell.

When I was a kid I thought they were too long, so I never read them. I Still haven't read any of them.

Attached: boogie.png (1200x1200, 220K)

FIRST
POST
BEST
POST

inclusiveness is about basic human decency. it is understandable why marginalised folks might not want to read plato joyce or dante and might feel deeply humilliated and even physically unsafe if someone claims the 'western canon' holds a monopoly on truth and wisdom that automatically overrides their lived experiences and their traditions of resistance. I think challenging canons is morally necessary for us in the humanities, it is meant to be transgressive, privileged people are not used to feeling uncomfortable and they have to get used to feeling uncomfortable. Remember the discomfort you feel at when your cultural hegemony is challenged is not even one millionth of the discomfort, fear and humilliation a trans person feels during every second of their waking existence.

>literally every gen x kid with an interest in reading went through a Harry Potter book at some point.
GenX was more the Star Wars generation

Attached: 28DF7696-C12C-4E2B-BA82-93CCACFEC5D5.jpg (452x408, 35K)

>it is understandable why marginalised folks might not want to read plato joyce or dante and might feel deeply humilliated and even physically unsafe if someone claims the 'western canon' holds a monopoly on truth and wisdom that automatically overrides their lived experiences and their traditions of resistance
Yes, because their IQ is too low

>folks

Attached: 4Chan_Meme_Pepe_Cringe01 - RENAME BEFORE POSTING.jpg (596x415, 39K)

The truth and eloquence of your post has made me stain my underclothes with emission, sir. Verily the small-soulled bugmen have been laid to waste this night!

Yes, well, when trannies and niggers present a good alternative or even comparable option to anyone in the western "canon" (aka just profound thinkers that people read because they were profound) I'll be more than happy to read it.
Also, define "human"

Basic human decency is not about inclusiveness.

Attached: Tkgd2007_Weasel_words.png (480x480, 65K)

>dude we should be less accepting toward marginalized groups of people!
fuck off /pol/

Well, it's on you to tell me why I should be *more* accepting than my baseline acceptance rate

>Moral necessity

Attached: asimov_bullshit.jpg (665x504, 315K)

unironically this. I think it is actually impossible to articulate a decent justification for being accepting of some groups, such as trannies for example.

Idiot

> better people
> worse people
> marginalized

That marketing division grunt doesn't understand what he's doing.

This is so true. I'm trans and have been murdered by a Plato reader before.

You can't call others that

Ban assault Plato readers now!

They know exactly what they're doing, so many loaded terms, the sad thing is that kind of 'promotion' works for the most part. Language is the ultimate psyops.

Not everybody should be taught to write and read

Attached: 1558750582353.jpg (480x469, 71K)

>left-wing "thought"

>trans "people"

Attached: 1300044776986.jpg (250x250, 17K)

I agree but only for stuff like black people, trannies don't really matter

best creative fiction of the 21st century. contact me when you win your nobel

Attached: 1504827393661.jpg (600x362, 43K)

This is your brain on anglo-american moralism, and yes I am aware you copy-pasted it from another bait thread.

I'm black, and I honestly don't think reading Plato is enough of a red flag (or really any at all) to signify to me that the white person is a threat. This could just be my ignorance, but I'll choose him in hope for a more interesting conversation and the opportunity to learn something.

What about if they were reading the Bell Curve

How would that make you feel

I read 1, 4, 5 and 6 and I'm a nazi.

fiction is a waste of time. that's why all those girls who read nothing but fiction are still retarded

Attached: tumblr_p1zkesCkDJ1tneugwo3_1280.jpg (1128x1452, 262K)

>human decency
>moral
>truth
wew keep those spooks to yourself faggot

>oh look is the butterfly that reads Stirner and Nietzsche but is a liberal at heart
kys faggot

t.

What about reading Plato inherently makes a person worse?

Attached: 1D3C4CF8-BF78-4755-9304-B8DA486BA684.jpg (576x1024, 89K)

What are some good non-fiction books?

>people who gladly consume shit have shitty ideas
Who knew?

Attached: 1489596047076.jpg (500x372, 22K)

>you're not allowed to have any area with cultural hegemony because that makes those that are foreign to it feel inferior
Is it any surprising that cuckolry became the meme to represent the whole progressive ideology?

>you can't have your own things because that makes foreign elements feel inferior
Is it any surprising that cuckolry became the meme representing the whole progressive ideology?

If what lefties want is a world without borders why don't they protest white people getting kicked out of Africa?

You would have to be a fag to read Harry Potter to begin with. I remember when they first came out the hype felt so manufactured.

They don't want a world without borders, they want a world without white people.

>it is understandable why marginalised folks might not want to read plato joyce or dante and might feel deeply humilliated and even physically unsafe if someone claims the 'western canon' holds a monopoly on truth and wisdom that automatically overrides their lived experiences and their traditions of resistance
These people would have little to no reason to feel marginalized or threatened by the western canon if they didn't believe deep down that their own culture/religion/tradition is made-up bullshit with no actual worth.

so because i read Nietzche i have to be a cousin-fucking, christ-loving degenerate?

maybe you feel insecure about your culture and identity and that's why you are threatened by diversity

>no you.

Attached: 1559212166165.png (621x606, 176K)

>quasi-monarchist anarchist
Please explain, I'm intrigued.

Maybe you're a disingenuous faggot who's gonna get rightly killed when the shit goes down

who the fuck would be afraid to read profound text because it was written by a white guy? there are profound thinkers in almost every culture and if you limit what you read because of the author's race or cultural background you have to be the lowest form of human

That's a long way to say Taoist.

Sorry, went to sleep. Basically I think anarchy is the ideal condition, but one humanity has to be primed and developed for. While humans are developing towards that end, the pre-post-state humans will necessarily form governments (and not necessarily as in we *need* a state, but that it simply is what happens). Of those potential governments, a monarchy is the best.
So, I say "quasi-monarchist" to indicate that in some contexts I support monarchy, and "anarchist" to indicate my idealized ideology, if you want to call it that

>Folks who read are generally better people.
by what standard?

I've read Harry Potter and I'm a pretty shitty person desu.

I read harry potter and whole heartedly agree with the statement that those born and bred for slavery in the castles at hogwarts belong there and ms granger needs to mind her own fucking business. House elves belong in chains!

harry potter is fucking trash, it's a garbage book for idiots. Idiots just happen to also be blissful in their own stupidity, making them seem like nicer people but they're just too stupid or too ignorant to be otherwise.

Uberfags

Wow you liek teh ad hominem attacks... ;-)

Typical deconstructionist reply, sidesteps an issue that they canot reply to by trying to redefine the discussion. The intellectual and moral equivalent of saying "I know you are but what am I?"
We really need to deconstruct deconstructionism, it is extremely vulnerable to it's own methods.

Nice ad for harry potter

Great response, you btfo'd him! Now tell us all how in an age of moral relativism there is suddenly some absolute definition of decency that requires the neoliberal/sjw defined concept of inclusiveness to be incorporated into it? Maybe Jesus or some other skydaddy has ordained it? Asking for a fren...

Ouch! Tender, tender...

reactionaries BTFO

You should read Weber on the origin of government in charisma, that might help you refine your ideas.

Attached: Max_Weber_1894.jpg (406x542, 45K)

Inclusiveness has nothing to do with basic human decency.

projection: the post

Thank you for the suggestion. I will see if I can find a PDF or something. Is that the name of the work you're suggesting? Or is it apart of some bigger piece

Do I feel threatened by the works of Chinese or Indian philosophers? No, because I believe that they enrich our world.
Do I feel threatened by e.g. the Afro-American rap culture? No, because they're a joke.
After all, trans people are mentally ill.
It's a book specifically written for teens. The problem isn't Harry Potter in particular. It's adults who believe that reading children's literature makes them intellectual and profound.

Kids should be reading Beyond Good and Evil in school.

>Uses outdated Freudian terminology.
>Actually the comment is just a pathetic "no you" counterattack.
Cringe.

Attached: 1526503741969.jpg (399x322, 25K)

If you have books available, hell if you can read to begin with, you live in a country with a higher education level and generally speaking are more well-off. These studies hold no value since they're just a statistic in a vacuum

The discomfort, fear and humiliation you describe is the result of suffering from the mental illness of gender dysphoria. To try to project it onto the surrounding society is silly. It reflects a basic discomfort and insecurity that "transsexuals" feel about their life style for which they blame the more than 99% of the population who are not like them, and instead insist that the 99%
alter all of society so as to adapt to their mental illness.
In the long run it will not work, either the society will reject this approach or it will collapse. History is quite clear on this sort of thing.

Good point!
#DeconstructDeconstructionism

Attached: 1544145707455.jpg (2000x1250, 885K)

Dubs.

But I disagree on the destroying of purity. Part of the plot is that Volde wants to expose the wizarding world and rule over the lesser people, while the good guy gang want to essentially continue to Wakanda themselves and be in their special group which is hidden and only the other specials can come join them (which we could draw analogies, replacing magical manifestation with Aryan will manifestation). When taking this approach, it becomes the good Aryans who want to live by themselves, vs the bad Aryans who want to use their divine greatness to rule non Aryans.

We should just ban the classics then logically

Max Weber was one of the founders of modern day sociology. I actually first came across his ideas about charisma in a book called The Trickster and the Paranormal by Geo. Hansen. Weber and charisma are talked about briefly in this short video:
bitchute.com/video/gHx9ZnAxJTfZ/
I have had some thoughts on this subject myself, I call the concept Anarcho-Monarcism. :-)

Yes, I suppose, but that is certainly a deeper reading and I was more referring to the purity of wizards themselves (I.e. no mudbloods vs mudbloods). In either case (segregation of magic/mundane or magic ruling mundane) there is a chance for miscegenation and this is what I'm contesting

Based and thanks. I'll look into it

nobody is calling for banning any books. you're just butthurt at the thought that they may no longer be required elementary reading. good riddance.

Yes, let's be forced to read about voluntary genital mutilation instead.
How enlightening

>inclusiveness is about basic human decency.
No it isn't you tremendous fucking faggot
>back 2 reddit

De nada!

entrenched and rouge capsuled Yea Forums chad

fpbp

>Yes, let's be forced to read about voluntary genital mutilation instead.

unironically more educational and inclusive than classic incel canon. i wish that was my grade school curriculum

kys tripfag

Educational in terms of knowing facts about delusion, but not so much in terms of learning critical thinking. And inclusion is not something good until you tell me why I'd want it

>Inclusion means exclusion

Well can change no mudblkoods vs mudbloods to "no mudaryans vs mudaryans", in that the pure blooded aryans are rejecting the spark of aryaness in other non aryans (wizard being a 'race' unto itself). So it is the acceptence of the capability of the races aryness even though the rest of the races are inferior.....Which as you pointed out, is destroying purity.....yet how can it be destroying purity when all that is happening is that new evolved aryaness is being added to the aryan peoples?

So the underlying message is to accept those of ability, and reject those who are not, yet that message is lost/not absorbed.

Ok fine, but lets not filter our entire worldview through the lens of the Potter series, shall we? We really don't need another protracted discourse on who is or who is not our worlds Voldemort.

>better
You try to define what is moral from an immoral perspective. Is treating immoral people with disdain not the moral thing to do, therefore are those who read Plato not the moral actors in this story?

>voluntary genital mutilation instead
You mean like circumcision? I fucking wish my dumb ass parents were forced to learn about immoral traditional practices that continue to go unquestioned.

I see. So you are talking about a type of spiritual/transcendental race as opposed to a material? If so, I tend to agree. The issue is that this book obviously is not about pushing ability but more so blind inclusion at the expense of unity. Two of the most powerful wizards are harry and vole and both are pure blooded. Does this mean halfbreeds can't be capable? Of course not. But imagine that instead of fighting essentially a civil war, both worked together. Yes, voldemort should have been willing to accept capable mudbloods and rejected weak purebloods, but to fight a war over this and lose life over inclusion vs exclusion is a waste of life in my opinion. It is a shit situation, one that we currently find ourselves in, but I honestly would rather voldemort have won and purity at the potential expense of capability be the prevailing ideology.

That is involuntary for the one being cut. Not the same, but equally or more disgusting

I read the first couple of books as an adult just out of curiosity, but never read them as a child

Oh just fuck off

fpbp

go to bed tao

The races are all material in that they are physical objects. The idea behind the aryan is that they contain the spark of creative ability that drives mankind and creates culture and society. We replace 'the spark of creative ability' with 'the spark of magical ability' to get to the wizard race.

I disagree that there is an agenda of pushing blind inclusion. That would of meant that those of non aryan/wizard ability would of also been included in the aryan/wizarding world, which was obviously not the case. Instead it was about rejecting the aryan/wizardness of those not descended from aryans/wizards. Working together would of been better, but that would of negated the original concept of rejecting purity, since to be aryan/wizard in it's entirety is to be pure because you have the needed qualities. Also, weak purebloods and non purebloods show a lacking of the needed aryness/wizardness, thus they would of degenerated to squibs, second generation, then just muggles, thus being unworthy of being in the special club. Yet the good guys side would of accepted those of lesser ability........so your point stands in that it is, rejected of purity. Yet if voldemort had won, then he would of had those of weak purebloods following him, which would of created weak bloodlines, and corrupt other bloodlines they breed with, thus reducing the aryness/wizardness ability, hence the purity concept becomes self destructive.

F P B P
P B
B P
P B P F

Fair enough. I wonder how many people (children and adults alike) get/got this message from it, though. You'd undoubtedly turn some antifa heads if you published a piece about this and it gained traction. Thanks for the chat, and I ultimately agree

No, circumcision is voluntary because parental rights supercede your rights as a newborn child. The point of education is to challenge traditional cultural practices, not reinforce them like justifying circumcision and denying equal human dignity to everyone who isn't a white hetero male.

excluding nazis is objectively good

Lol. I wonder if they've separated them from othe generations, or just people who read in general as they tend to be more open. Link to "study"?

Harry isn't very powerful, he's just in the situation where he has no other choice but to be
Voldemort isn't pureblooded btw. That was the irony of his character

Ok, well I immediately disagree in that there are no "rights" in this regard, only things people can inflict on others without repercussions. Anyhow, any alteration of a potentially consenting person should wait until they can consent, which is why rape is illegal (because the person cannot or does not consent to being raped). If you want to allow circumcision because of some arbitrary "right" of the parent, I'll have no quarrel with throwing you off a cliff

Thank god another lefty on this board. What are your opinions on the white people occupying Palestine?

#IsraelOut2020

this but also tankies

It's been a while since I read any of them, but you're right now that I think about it. I ultimately agreed with this guy so what I said isn't really important

Circumcision is immoral and should be an international crime against humanity. I mention circumcision because it's an unjustifiable tradition like denying equal dignity and rights to marginalized people. If it's wrong to circumcise babies before they can consent, surely it's unreasonable to expect minorities to abide by a social contract to an oppressive capitalist state that requires their dehumanization to maintain hegemony.

Actually it's misstating the study, which found a correlation but didn't demonstrate causation.

It is unreasonable to expect that, I agree. But it is just as unreasonable to expect me to bend over backwards and fuck my own ass because they want to continue living here. There is no tangible benefit to accommodating them.

God imagine a world where the left actually gave a shit.

this

poorly formulated bait, try harder next time

Dude, accepting black and trans people as equal members of society and undeserving of state enforced discrimination is not bending over backwards for them. They have thoughts and feelings just like you do and it's immoral for you to think they're any less of a person than you are.

>we should be challenging the western canon with neoliberal consumer garbage

Attached: ChYD7ub.jpg (823x586, 162K)

>Average age of Yea Forums user is 24.5 years old
>
Did somebody say cynical assholes? An entire generation living vicariously through archival footage with no galvanizing experiences or events of their own? A legacy of being the zero point of mediocre globalized cultural homogeneity?

That's not true. My morals are based on rational principles. Identification with race or "gender" isn't rational, but emotional. They aren't human so long as they continue this behavior and aren't worth my acceptance beyond listening to their whining

Is this a joke? Only the leftists are trying to outlaw circumcision and stop imperialism.

>Ethnostates can’t exist
>Schools where only wizards are accepted and go to be with their own kind can - no muggles allowed

>children who read Harry Potter grow up to hold more accepting views towards marginalized groups of people
it's true, i sympathize towards conservatives/Christians because of Harry Potter.
Rowling clearly meant for Voldemort and his ilk to represent Democrats/Muslims.

>better people
>vast majority of Muslims haven't read Harry Potter
>therefore Muslims are shitty people.

The word used was “left”. Not “liberal”

>it's understandable why marginalised folks might not want to read western canon
>i think challenging canons is morally necessary
how the frick are you going to challenge something you haven't even read?
you clearly just hate white culture simply for being white
>i don't know what the western canon is even about, since i've never read any of it, nonetheless, i STRONGLY disagree with it.

JK Rowling is a liberal, not a leftist.

>idiot
that wasn't very inclusive, thereby making you an idiot by your own professed standard

Attached: ButterflyPoster.jpg (1920x1080, 681K)

we don't want to ban Plato, we just want common sense Plato abridgements.

it makes you believe in idealism (or at least, aware that there is such as thing as idealism) as compared to the materialism currently taught by TV and public education.

Wrong direction, user, it's overly reasonable, like autistically reasonable. You're supposed to fuck up, and not know about morals, and discover them by yourself in the context that they'll most be apparent to you. "Know yourself," not some hackneyed literary idea of morality that's stuck to the pages like cum. You just took the idolizing aspect of youth and ran with it like good little pathologique.

This. No higher thought will be permitted in the consumerist hellscape we are approaching and most of these bugmen yearn for

You are so right about identity politics
btw I'm a minority

Fuck off tripfaggot
NO ONE gives a shit about retarded shit up say
Kill yourself

Good on you for acknowledging it. Welcome to the club

Attached: 1557248720553m.jpg (765x1024, 79K)

Attached: 1555622593524.jpg (1440x1249, 229K)

kek

This.

Great reply! Now dazzle us with your intellect again by responding to this question...

Hey, that's a good point, but I also would like an answer to this: how in an age of moral relativism can there be some absolute definition of decency that requires the neoliberal/sjw defined concept of inclusiveness to be incorporated into it? Did Zeus tell you? Or Odinn, orYahweh? Just curious...

if you need a religious teaching or some other authoritative man made source to tell you to treat people of different skin color and sexual preference as equals to you, you're fucked in the head. human dignity and civil equality are self evident, universal truths.

what retarded kid would think harry potter would be worth reading

You are good, my friend. Very good. You would get flying colors in undergrad literature/gender studies/some other bullshit courses. This is some high quality bait

Can't help projecting, can you retard?

Attached: 1543199936143.jpg (620x465, 83K)

imagine you are a white liberal, and you are presented with two people, one of them is a normal girl while the other is an tranny. Who would you rather fuck? As it is often the case with white liberals this could be a matter of life and death, who out of the two “girls” is least likely to make you a fucking homo?

accurate desu

>children who read harry potter and are now adults
>anybody aged 18-35 who ever read a book when they are children

non-retarded millennials are slightly less prejudiced than retarded/old people. shocking

nobody chooses to be gay just like nobody chooses to be straight. you don't even have to be one or the other, some people like both or neither. you don't have to be thinking of reproducing with the opposite sex to be sexually aroused. heck, making a baby is the last thing people want to do when they jack off. if sexual attraction was exclusively rooted in the primitive biological urge to breed, then why is there such a wide variety of fetishes?

F
P
B
P

Attached: B7D21F08-9302-4CCF-8B9A-903C99B2FC42.png (500x743, 227K)

Why does this board consistantly produce best baits?

I am against the ideology of homosexuality, it is evident most homosexuals do it because they are democrats and have been brainwashed by democrat college proffessors

more importantly, why liberals haven't moved with their poc pets to Africa and leave white countries alone? after all, is just a piece of land right. im sure Africa would be thriving in a few years with all that diversity.

>fren
Imagine being a "man" who calls others degenerates but cloaks his psychopathic views in meme baby talk.

>Basically, kids who read Harry Potter grow up to read Stephen King.
And he was right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

F P B P
P F P B
B P F P
P B P F

>nobody chooses to be gay just like nobody chooses to be straight

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

kek

If you think you could enjoy sucking cock under any circumstances, you are not straight.
Sorry you had to find out this way.

Bruh, you need to meet some women in their 30s. Wall into a female, white collar office environment with young millenials/gen xers and they will all love Harry Potter.

i read all of the books and now i browse Yea Forums.com's literature board

homosexuality isn’t an ideology. you’re born sexually aroused by male genitalia, or you’re not. men have always been sucking dicks, it’s only until now that it’s decriminalized and acceptable to be open about it. pedos don’t choose to be pedos either just like you didn’t choose to be hetero. some people are aroused by floor tiles and others by saying the n word.

Based!
If pedos are unable to be anything other than pedos then there can be no moral qualm about permanently removing the danger they represent to society after their conviction in a court of law by permanently removing them from society, either through lifetime imprisonment in a mental institution or execution.

So you liek the boi rape? You must vote Democrat, then, and hate Trump.

Attached: the left wants paedos.jpg (852x1024, 225K)

fuck off, fascist. 99% of pedos don't ever touch a child. there is literally nothing wrong with pedophilia. the only problem arises if they act on it and violate that child's rights.

Attached: slippery-slope-comic-LGBTQP.png (1140x300, 53K)

Sure, sure, that is your story, stick to it... But one is one too many. Way too many.

Attached: paedo pedos SJWs foster gay couple-1.jpg (678x1024, 162K)

Wow just look at those faces...

Attached: connect the dots Mark Thompson paedo.jpg (555x1024, 194K)

Pretty much. I don't see people clamoring in the streets to humor the voices of schizophrenics or else we're FLYOVER WHITE CISHETEROPATRIARCHAL GLUMPF-VOTING BIGGOTS.
Stop enabling mental illness and the faking of it (69 genders, transtrenders, etc).

>are less prejudice
And apparently don't understand English.

3/10

My motivation for reading is because I think that after the end of WW2 alot of great literature was locked away and is now forbidden knowledge. Liberal faggots and dumb jews were determined never to let another holocaust happen ever again. So any thought that leads to fascism has been complexly destroyed.. I want to unlock fascist primal rage and become a murderer or something like that. I want to unlock my 12 dna strands and collect psionic weapons in DMT space.Or maybe I want to write my own book that drives people mad causes the entire universe to implode.

genocide harry potter readers

Yes, and:
>Dune
>LOTR
>Terry Brooks bullshit
Harry potter is a little late to have been anything close to universal.

I think that to which user was alluding is the fact that the caption in the OP was itself marginalizing.

Attached: edgy.jpg (480x360, 30K)

David Lynch’s Dune wasn’t marketed to kids so much. I personally loved seeing I when it got to cable.
The LotR book was published a lot longer ago, the animation was before my time, I still haven’t seen it all the way through. And you know the Jackson films aren’t GenX. No, our generation only had D&D
Is that what Terry Brooks is like? Never read. Wait, is t that Discworld?

Star Wars was still bigger. At least for me I was

Attached: 12787743-A2B0-46A6-B8D4-5BC8FD22F97F.jpg (800x512, 154K)

>alot
>I want to unlock fascist primal rage and become a murderer or something like that
You literally do only have 12 strands of DNA you cretinous faggot

Attached: zoomer pods.gif (652x562, 626K)

>implying that liking trans or POC is what makes one a good person

Attached: Hzms34f.png (746x717, 102K)

>thinking that I am off calibration
I am older than you are.
>David Lynch’s Dune wasn’t marketed to kids so much
It was very present.
>The LotR book was published a lot longer ago
Also, very present.
>the animation
It was terrible. Fuck you for raising the issue - now the song is in my head again.
>Is that what Terry Brooks is like?
I was a poorfag and needed a substantial piece of literature for a HS book report. I literally found a copy of Sword of Shanara in the gutter while walking home. By the time I realized the gravity of my mistake, I was already committed.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sword_of_Shannara
>Star Wars was still bigger.
Sure - overall. The others were more spotty, though their followings were more intense. There was not a lot of teenage literary critique of Star Wars. It was a different aspect of the literary scene. Anyways, all of this more applies to the earliest GenXers, which is where I fit. I agree with your premise for 10 or so years further down the road.

In Clown World, all of this makes sense.
>Honk!
>Honk!

>Basically, kids who read Harry Twater grow up to be better people

This person needs to be shot in the head

I cam back here to wish curses on whoever thinks being a good person is a virtue. It's not the point idiot!

treating others as others would do unto you does in fact make you a good person

>misusing Q.E.D.

Yea, that sounds like a Plato "scholar"

such an eloquence response. Sir.

You don't have to like trans or POC, but you do have to treat them as equals and share the public space with them. If a majority of the class does not want to read western incel canon, then maybe they shouldn't.

>trannies
they would choose Plato, as he liked taking it up the ass
>PoC
Not sure about this though. If it's brownskin or chink they might choose plato. Never met a nigger to know how they'll roll

>I am older than you are.
Really? How old are you? I suppose my parents sheltered me from all that magic stuff.
>Shanara
Oh yeah, I remember that title.
Sorry about the song

I reas Harry Potter as a kid and I hate niggers. What is this sorcery?

That's a load of bullshit. Homosexuality is conditioned, not something you are born into. Case in point, I was straight until I was brainwashed be bisexual at 26. Sissy hypnosis videos have ruined my life!

That’s not homosexuality, user. That’s bisexuality. And it’s nothing to be ashamed of. You can either embrace it or shun it for the rest of your life. I just recommend being comfortable with yourself.

I was homosexual from the start