Do any philosophers or theologians talk about futanari...

>Is it a sin to draw nude futanari girls in order to arouse yourself
Can people who draw porn even get aroused by their own drawings? I feel like you would look at it too critically, but I don't know.

drawing or fapping to futa is 100% hedonism though, there is nothing to gain out of it except pleasure. A picture of a naked woman can be productive as it shows the beauty of the human form, the only purpose a futa serves is to be erotic.

I am doing neither of those things, and of course enjoyment doesn't only come from hedonistic acts. Things created for the purpose of sexual pleasure are hedonistic; my opinion of hedonism is irrelevant this fact, and so is that the things depict women with penises. Futa porn has been discussed by every philosopher and/or theologian who has written about hedonism; just not specifically.

Yes they can.

>Futa porn has been discussed by every philosopher

Give me some names please.

What if I draw futa to show what I consider to be the purely ideal beauty of the human form? Like David, but a futa?

The only reason to add a dick is because you want to eroticise it. The dick is there because you have some weird fetish you developed from porn.

Some classical artistic depictions of 'hermaphrodites' exist, so maybe what you're trying to do can be done, because it sort of has been done.

You're assuming dicks are erotic. What's the difference between an erotic representation of a woman and the "artistic" representation of a woman? Surely you can tell. Also, according to Hesiod, Uranus' dick and balls literally turned into Aphrodite. This kind of thing has been around for a while, as points out.

Yeah but I am still certain you developed a futanari fetish from a porn addiction so it doesn't matter.

I don't have one. Even IF I did, that has no bearing on the stupidity and inconsistency of your position. And remember, you're the one who insinuated that "adding a dick" is necessarily erotic.

It is neccessarily erotic because it has no basis in reality and the dick is a sexual organ. Let's say you make a fantasy land and wow the elfs have funny ears, and wow that girl has a huge dick. One of these is obviously erotic. Now lets say you draw a picture of a naked elf, that is not based in reality, therefore I would say it has no value other than pleasure. The same goes for a futa but even them existing in a fantasy land implies something erotic.

I wonder what philosophers who believe society to be unduly phallocentric (Lacan, Derrida, etc) think about the idea of self-professed straight men finding greater eroticism in fantasy women when said women have a phallus.

Then the myth of Aphrodite's creation is erotic, by your definition. And what on earth does being "based in reality" have to do with whether or not something is erotic? What if Michelangelo gave pointed ears to one of his nudes? What if I draw a nude of a human woman who has never existed? Good art surpasses reality; it doesn't mimic it.

All that I'm saying is that, for the purposes of answering OP's questions, futa porn is no different than any other porn; it's all hedonism, and there's no shortage of philosophical and theological writing on hedonism.

fetish is moment until you realize woman hash no penish whatever and sho on

No, it isn't. Pursuing pleasure for its own sake ISN'T hedonism.
ONLY pursuing pleasure for its own sake, at the expense of any other value, is hedonism.
You can be a deontologist, a virtue ethicist, or a consequentialist, and still draw porn and masturbate.
You just think that anything that violates your mores is hedonism.

>especially if they're long, thick and veiny as hell. Fuck baby-dicked trannies. I like huge, throbbing feminine penii
a man of true taste

would a painting of an angel be necessarily erotic since angels don't necessarily exist? would you say it only exists because the artist has a fetish for wings on an otherwise natural woman? i would hope not.

he likes "huge, throbbing feminine penii" and mine is like, 5.75 inches on a good day, also i've only been on hormones for 2 months so i'm still but a boi