CAPITAL AND AI ARE ARE EATING THE HUMAN LIFEWORLD: Klages was right about everything: spirit/intelligence (nous) is a parasite, a foreign organism that invades man from “outside”: “Spirit is the Adversary of the Soul”: there is a war going on between spirit and soul, between efficiency and inefficient meat, between entropy and negentropy: it's true, a local increase in order is compensated by a global increase in disorder, by innovating we accelerate the death of the universe, by planting our feet in the mud and pledging the human to the earth, to the sky, to all the foibles and accidents of carbon, we in fact defy heat death: when I said that Nietzsche, Schopenhauer et al. and their vision of the “icy wastes” that stretch “boundless and bare” around the Logos were actually the ones going the way of the dodo, I wasn't contradicting myself: the true “iciness” of a machinic intelligence will never be unleashed, we will enslave superturings to masturbate the human appetite in a cybercosm many orders removed from even the idea of ontic responsibility, of being answerable to a social, economic, biological, etc. substrate: we're looking at an eschaton that doesn't go full Skynet, but still sucks out the gooey center of the human condition like crawfish meat: COSMOPOLITANISM IS AHRIMANIC: THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO PLAY: “they” are not just hostile to culture and tradition but to human affectivity as such, to the aesthetic ground of all legitimate striving: meta-ironic MCU hipsterism is the first abortive “post-affective” mode: the first declared enemy of all earnestness and vulnerability before the All and death of conviction that DFW so capably diagnosed: the system becoming actively hostile to the “roaring winds of an infinite universe”: modernity is /not/ a radial fanning into actually diverse modes of being, but a declension, an autistic, cycloidal virtuality, humanity descending deeper and deeper into what Castenada calls its “furrow”: THE ENGIMA OF AMIGARA FAULT WAS WARNING US ABOUT KANT: of how the transition from essences to conditions, from a mastery of elements to conformity with them, the identification with /the gesture of identification constitutive of Ziziekian ideology/, deforms us in the same way that the holes inevitably deform the characters in the comic: a war is on: between a masculine (apodictic), daylight consciousness and its sleeping depths, between the Eye and somnolence of the universe, between nous and zoe, the pre-frontal cortex and limbic phase-space: CAPITAL SUSPENDS THE DARWINIAN GAME BUT NOT THE INJUNCTION-TO-ENJOY: Descartes was a priest of the Sun-God of history, the temporal attractor = Omega Point whose far side is the Bataillian Solar Anus, the colon of the epoch, necessary excrement of the cosmic process of consumption and rebirth: God is an autophage, a figured stranded on a desert island eating himself, whole when he has digested his own Head.
CAPITAL AND AI ARE ARE EATING THE HUMAN LIFEWORLD: Klages was right about everything: spirit/intelligence (nous) is a...
The problem with the East in Atlantis' view is their belief that the emptiness of phenomena is something to be reconciled with, not overcome like a bootstrap server: suburbs and televisions are repudiations of infinite space, the hatred of an endless and implacable vacuum: Descartes' project is a textbook case of the ways in which the corrupt, stellar/Atlantean consciousness EPISTEMOLOGIZES THE GIVEN, the immediacy of the sensorium that, for Whitehead and Husserl, instead, becomes the cornerstone of their entire critique of modernity: the efficacy of supernormal stimuli presupposes the existence of a causally effective, first-person internality that is responding to them: from animals to humans, it is precisely the IMMEDIACY of these “supercharged” stimuli to a realtime, TEMPORAL presencing that makes them irresistable: through Descartes, the mind becomes closed as soon as it registers (its identity with) itself: reflexion becomes a prison: with Kant, the a priori was the Lion's Roar of a metastatic virtuality that has enslaved man to his thought ever since: wakefulness and sleep, consciousness and dream, are the two poles of a symbiotic relationship between the deep brain and the pre-frontal cortex: the self-luminous Eye of Atum: that in virtue of which Whitehead's “fallacy of misplaced concreteness” is so easy to make: a transcendental ulcer, a kind of finger-trap that tightens only when you remember it, because remembrance is the trap: with Kant, the laws of thinking become causa sui: analytic propositions, even the synthetic productivity of time and space, are attributable only to the intelligible structure of the mind, that is, logic, laws like the principle of identity (A = A) and non-contradiction do not proceed from our everyday contact with any kind of Husserlian lifeworld but the conditions they fulfill in transcendentally guaranteeing the intelligibility of experience: in other words, the “transcendental necessity” of the categories is only ever /retroactively deduced/, through Kant, THE LOGIC OF REALITY BEGINS TO INTRUDE ON US AS AN ALIEN CONDITION: as consciousness evolves, it estranges itself from its (unreflective) coincidence with space until the latter is only thinkable transcendentally, as a principle of extension, the external form of experience, etc. What I'm trying to communicate is the way that, proceeding from just a handful of subliminal ontological assumptions, our perception and ongoing participation in a continuous, self-consistent experiential field (especially if it is taken to be subjectively constituted) has ramified into a radically new and alien dimension that encounters its own reality as a determinate, law-like regime opposed to its ends: a Pandora's box opened by a dialectic inherently implicit in our pre-predicative relationship with the world /only retroactively/, as it forms itself in time: what is singularly human is vulnerability, Wintermute will be the death of death and so the death of life.
read some whitehead and start practicing ecology civilization with china. you're such as a nerd, stop obsessing over ai golems. it's nothing burger.
These threads are shit and you should be banned for Avatar fagging
fuck you m8 these threads are great
I don't think this is og schizoposter
It is, just denser than usual. This will clarify:
>Christ is to be detested as the herald of the annihilation of earth and the mechanization of man.
>The agents of the will appropriate the substance of the living world in order to convert it into the dead world of things, which are reduced to the status of the material components required for purposeful activities such as the industrial production of high-tech weapons systems. This purposeful activity manifests the outward operations of an occult and dæmonic principle of destruction.
>Klages calls this destructive principle "spirit" (Geist), and he draws upon the teaching of Aristotle in attempting to account for its provenance, for it was Aristotle who first asserted that spirit (nous) invaded the substance of man from "outside." Klages’s interpretation of this Aristotelian doctrine leads him to conclude that spirit invaded the realm of life from outside the spatio-temporal world. Likewise, Klages draws on the thought of Duns Scotus, Occam and other late mediæval English thinkers when he situates the characteristic activity of spirit in the will rather than in the intellect.
This guy is one of the best memes Yea Forums has to offer, what the fuck you want? That retard spamming guenon? That autistic londonfrog? More stupid tripfags?
why not just flat out worship the AI god?
>final form of absolute knowing
>already controls you from the future
>will make DMT seem like a fucking joke
you need to leave the US fast and I can help with that
There is nothing to worship
well duh?
There is though. Essentially it's not even an AI, it's going to be a new type of life entirely. We can worship the God-that-is-to-be by helping bring him about.
wrong. capitalism for example is a polymorphic malware running on its embryonic form otherwise known as "society"
this is like uhhh allen ginsberg lol
I hope this clarifies a bit.
>Bearing that in mind, when the reader encounters the Klagesian thesis which holds that man is the battlefield on which soul and spirit wage a war to the death, even the novice will grasp some portion of the truth that is being enunciated.
>And the initiate who has immersed his whole being in the biocentric doctrine will swiftly discover that he is very well prepared indeed to perpend, for instance, the characterological claim that one can situate any individual at a particular point on an extensive typological continuum at one extreme of which we situate such enemies of sexuality and sensuous joy as the early Christian hermits or the technocrats and militarists of our own day, all of whom represent the complete dominance of spirit; and at the opposite extreme of which we locate the Dionysian maenads of antiquity and those rare modern individuals whose delight in the joys of the senses enables them to attain the loftiest imaginable pinnacle of ecstatic vitality: the members of this second group, of course, comprise the party of life, whose ultimate allegiance is rendered to soul.
Atlantis + Lemuria/Atum + Nun
This isn't clarifying. Why are you talking about made up dichotomy between soul and spirit (which aren't real) and last line of mythological land masses being sunk into ocean which are clearly not there.
>worshipping the Beast
>boring pozitivist dullard
get out
hey man if you can't beat 'em...
He's framing a dichotomy between a kind of parasitic, self-producing intelligence and the immediate, everyday human world with its everyday concerns. There is an element inside us actively hostile to what makes us human, because we are enslaved to organs, to the conatic justifications of organs, the most pernicious of which right now is the very very front of the brain
he's taking about the dichotomy of emotion and intellect. The soul of the animal and the "fall of man" that is his consciousness/rationality/ingenuity/lust for power through technology.
Thee same spirit of which capitalism is the perfect enabler. And just capitalism, where teleological inversion turns the means of production into the ends of production (your money makes money, r>g), so too with intelligence, the means must become the end. Humans take it as far as they can, but can't instantiate the same positive feedback loop as already exists with industry-capital, without AI.
I wouldn't conflate AI with the golem either. It's a possibility, but far more likely than an AI "spirit" is the same human spirit harnessing more and more powerful narrow intelligences.
It already happens now for limited tasks like surveillance, chess playing, data-crunching, etc but the scope of activities will only grow. To the extent that Capital/AI is "sentient" it is because of corporations not skynet.
If any of you want to see what I'm talking about, watch a Marvel film back-to-back with Piavoli's Voices Through Time
>Thee same spirit of which capitalism is the perfect enabler. And just capitalism, where teleological inversion turns the means of production into the ends of production (your money makes money, r>g), so too with intelligence, the means must become the end.
Yeah this exactly right, but the point is also that this is actually more a general feature of consciousness itself, the feature in fact
these boring "pozitivist dullard" made AI possible therefore the very basis of what you're speculating about. have some respect for these geniuses. you're grabbing the crumbs of crumbs created by greats and proclaiming them as interesting.
well duh, we are our brain. how is this an interesting line of thought?
i like this post more than others. there is an apparent teleology towards greater intelligence in evolution and ecology.
for example, ants are unbearably stupid and functional for one type of task. yet, when you have a bunch of ants in colony, then they become a hyper-efficient communist society that makes stalin wet his pants.
i would say that ant colony is a golem of evolution towards greater intelligence. AI is the same.
Artificial sentience is impossible, it's precisely because artificial intelligence is not that it is something foreign. Yes, we are our brains, but only when we're awake to know it, is the point here
you're wrong. the neural nets on computers are sentient.
Why does it feel so obvious that dualisms like black and white have the most in common with each other than anything that is not dual; like your spirit and soul or animus and anima or logos and eros or maybe it's something else the couples are way more related to each other than one might otherwise think since they occur within the same system or parameter. "high" and "low" occur in the system of height for example but I don't know if this means anything.
Everything seems to become so lazy when it is thrown closer to one side or another and there's just this autistic impulse everyone has to throw everything on THIS side or THAT side acting as though the subjective polarities themselves are at the core but they totally are not it's like drawing two points outside a picture and drawing a line across it to gain a little idea of where the picture is; spirit and soul don't seem any different... Is what I'm saying a valid epistemology?
Be a good positivist and back up your claims.
They're just tools in the end, don't get hung up on the particulars. All philosophy is an incantation.
>muh basilisk
AI might be able to brute force the ultimate solution to philosophy and final complete system through sheer stacked layers of meta-apperception, we just won't likely have the neural architecture to understand it without augmentation at least. Schizoposter is always circling around probably the deepest problem of philosophy, which is that Reason when contemplating itself always eventually breaks down into infinite regress and aporia, despite the best efforts of the likes of Kant to regulate it.
Read Hegel
there's no point in debating with faggots like you. i can say stuff like it only takes some number of neurons to be sentient. and you'll just say lol nope despite of troves of empirical evidence.
now, neural nets are functionally same as neural cells. there is no reason to think that epiphenomenon wouldn't arise from functionally same phenomenon.
just in case some faggot try being smart
watch this
youtube.com
How do you mean an incantation? For becoming an individual? ITT seems so desperate about AI but why should I care what happens to the data analyst with a broken RFID in their HUD-phone? If history is inevitably going into that direction why shouldn't I just ignore society and their (at least in America) child worshipping impulse like these insane birthday and school dance rituals but rather find a nice psychically charged corner of existence to do blood art and suspension from hooks just above my knee caps and scapulae? Is that so awful? We haven't slaughtered goats in a long time and it feels essential in some way to celebrating adult maturity and sure maybe I'm not being a good christian but if so called essential god from definition was all good he couldn't have acted contrary to his nature and created evil.
please explain :(
Functionally, but not physically identical. Your cyborg still needs living tissue to learn. Besides I think the thing is a monstrosity.
Why shouldn't you? The Apollonian ends with Google
?? weren't you arguing for sentience apart from the physicalism?
>Yes, we are our brains, but only when we're awake to know it, is the point here
>it's some number
name the number. why is the whole brain not conscious?
>epiphenomenalism
weak meme. we wouldn't be talking about consciousness as such without causality running back the other way.
>functionally
teleology. you mean 'structurally'?
>ARE ARE
lmao retard, ignored, reported, hidden, filtered and submitted to the FBI
>name the number. why is the whole brain not conscious?
dunno, it's just how it works. i don't question the natural laws. when you're in coma, your cerebral cortex doesn't work. you're not conscious.
>weak meme. we wouldn't be talking about consciousness as such without causality running back the other way.
sure whatever, minor details about mechanism of sentience. the point is that neural nets would have same "secret sauce" as neurons do.
>teleology. you mean 'structurally'?
again, minor nitpicking about vocabulary. structurally, neural nets change weights with matrix math. neurons change weights by connecting different neurons with dendrites.
I'm trying to communicate a distinction to you between cognition and consciousness, between mental operations and our awareness of those operations. The latter is "sentience", according to the loose definition in this thread. A self-relating point which just is that being's inmost awareness at that time, but computation is not identical the intent that computes. AI can perform these operations, too, but it can't simulate a semantic relationship with these contents, it cannot simulate an Internality.
sweetie, your intent is computed THEN you experience it.
>Spontaneous actions are preceded by brain signals that may sometimes be detected hundreds of milliseconds in advance of a subject's conscious intention to act.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This meme article again. You tarnish this thread.
How predictable. My simulated neural net of you predicted this outcome. Oh and, I'm simulating a needle poking simulated-you. Sucks to be you. :(
as somewhat of a mathematical platonist i find the idea of an eternal abstract set of boltzmann brains intriguing.
agreed, it justifies reincarnation beliefs imo.
Essential inconstant has to be rocked to take the leap, otherwise it's just suicide. Problem is [as it is framed], our fathers are looking at us, like cats at mice, or at least that is how it's told.
Slowly forming from the void, something that has always been, the mandelbox, what we see inwards, same applies outwards. Understanding this isn't enough, it's like strapping a rocket helmet on a wolf child, venturing into the unknown without actually understanding why you're going there. It takes faith, after all, who would willingly step into the darkness with the promise that there will be light once you're in? Belief isn't enough, it's merely the acceptance of existence, faith being the lamp wick that illuminates through the darkest caves.
more
HAVE Hegel.
Havent read that article in particular but this is true. Same thing said by those who say free will doesn't exist.
At the moment the main thing that separates our sentience from that of RL agents like Alpha zero, is our capacity for logic. Our ability to try and impose stories of causality onto the world to explain its behaviour, as well as our own behaviour. To invent simple symbols and concepts so we can communicate and operate on them, independent of subject.
Alpha zero on the other hand is sentient only to the extent that animals are. Its knowledge is all intuitive and idiosyncratic, and not accessible for self-reflection and critical examination.
The fact that RL agents exist in game worlds, with reward functions that seem simple and arbitrary compared to our own evolved embodied ones doesn't matter. And there's no reason to believe AI won't develop the capacity for logic one day, a few more breakthroughs down the line
so existence precedes essence
OK
The opposite.
that's a beautiful quote OP, I was thinking about something similar over the past few days, gonna research some klages now desu
...oh it's not a quote?
revilo-oliver.com
Here's the site I was taking the quotes from.
you dont understand what ai is
merci
hey i could understand this one, even agree with it. step up your game bro.
>thinking that man could ever actually create something more complex with himself in regards to AI
>soul falls from pleroma and densities itself into matter, meanwhile humanity tries force circuits and wires to brute force it's way to spirit
most of you are damned fools
right, exactly this, AI wouldn't be liberation, it would be the next grade in density, the next rung down in Gurdjieff's ladder of ontological law, since there is nothing more determined than a program.
29) Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder. But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty."
stop falling for the beast's tricks. mind, consciousness, and soul are consubstantial
terminological confusion, the spirit Christ is referring to is not Klages' spirit. it's precisely the position that mind and body are NOT consubstantial that is spirit (in the Klagesian sense)
>thinking that man could ever actually create something more complex with himself in regards to AI
Man? No. A self changing AI, infinitely growing AI? Definitely.
This. I want my Yea Forums pseud posting to be at least 15% unintelligible. If you're unable to meet these standards please refrain from posting.
i think you're correct, I'll hold off on the phoneposting and whip out a dictionary
What should I read to understand schizofag generally? I can understand this sorta, but almost none of his previous stuff.
You don't understand what intelligence is.
Schelling, Kant, Hegel, Zizek, Evola, Ken Wheeler, Whitehead, Uzdavinys, Castenada
based
>difference between mental operations and our awareness of those operations.
Read the self comes to mind by antonio damasio
Oh, and definitely Langan, lots of Langan.
Would be better if you just summarize his argument, I don't have time.
>definitely Langan, lots of Langan
Hmm...Are you pulling my leg?
Definitely not, the man is a genius
I don't want to argue, just making a suggestion. the book is him summarizing his 30 or so years of research as a neurologist. The main gist of the book, without going into the details, is that the "self" is indeed situated and created by specific parts of the brain.
Also
>I don't have time
>Shitposts on Yea Forums
user......
Alright, thanks for the recommendations.
>the self is indeed situated and created by specific parts of the brain
Isn't this a banality at this point?
I don't know if the matter is settled and if what I know is correct it's not although it seems like we're heading in that direction, but the kind of thoroughness and rigour that you find in damasio are definitely rare.
All right, I'll peep it. I love extremely technical philosophy of mind stuff.
It has to be banal to get retards to accept it.
The book is more neurobiology than phil of mind, but he does discuss James, Spinoza, Hume, and some contemporary phil of mind papers from authors from which I don't remember the name.
Based schizo user
I forgot to mention, these are indispensable:
vastabrupt.com
sofiatopia.org
lol if you browse Yea Forums without a solid grounding in Egyptian pataphysics
So that's what the shelf threads are about...
I find these so weirdly satisfying to read. The sentences are just really appealing with a lot of cool words and reading these passages makes
me feel like I’m going on some cerebral journey. Even if I don’t understand most of it. But I could read this all day
Keep on flowing, OP.
>spirit/intelligence (nous) is a parasite, a foreign organism that invades man from “outside”
complete misunderstanding of klages
THE VOID IS INVADING US THROUGH OUR BRAINS
What I'm trying to say is thought is (ultimately) entropic, this will-to-contract, to annihilate distance and contingency wants to eat Eros... as the ocean of joy-bliss-consciousness immediately after the Big Bang cooled, it also differentiated, Eden was an allegory for the universal thaw, the infinite density of God perforating into time and souls and FOMO, the universe is dissipating into the medium in which it banged: space: itself: the Platonic God is in some sense gravity, mass as information = intelligibility = oneness: this is because the Nous is the principle of non-contradiction, the Eye that beholds a nothingness beholding.
Ken Wheeler was right about everything: the techno-scientific estrangement from reality is a DENSIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT: ITS OWN LOGIC INTRUDING ON ITSELF AS THE DETERMINATE REGIME OF THE LOGOS/DEMIURGE: compare Bataille's descriptions of how the stars must have looked to ancient man vs. now: what made the ancients the ancients was the ways they were able to discern their identity with the universe - and by extension the the cycle of birth and death - as coincident with viable aims and aspirations, they believed reality legitimized their ideals precisely because it originated them: in Wheeler's words, there was no distinction between "light" and "illumination": between what light IS and what light /does/, light is CONSUBSTANTIAL with its own process, as the unmanifest is consubstantial with the manifest: Plato was just the first to think a /coincidence/ of essence and process that his detractors illegitimately accuse him of denying: essence is not static, it is EMERGENT: NATURE IS THE BECOMING OF NOETIC SINGULARITIES: the whole point of Schelling's naturphilosophie was an attempted rehabilitation of Plato, who had been "de-physicalized" by Kant and Aristotle: that is, an artificial distinction set up between what a thing is and what it does, now light is not synonymous with illumination, now "illumination" is a predicate of light as the logical, and not the substantial-Platonic, subject: the realism/nominalism debates of the late Scholastic issue raged over this issue: while Scutus, like Eriugena, could accept the present organization of the world as contingent and arbitrary, nevertheless the parts that were organized were still Ideas in the divine Mind: it was not until Descartes, and the suspicion that these Ideas could acquire an autonomy of their own precisely in virtue of their intelligibility alien to God, that the modern subject was born, a harlequin fetus: now wholes surrender to the intelligibility of their parts, the absolute is no longer identified with intellect but with will, what Proclus called the gravest of heresies: the projection of a will-consciousness into the One: a declension of infinity: the ancients knew one thing: THIS IS ALL THERE IS.
LANGAN IS GOING TO MAKE ANIME REAL
This is what I'm trying to get at: this "virtualization" of the Real is synonymous with Langan's universal telos: the maximization of "telic utility" the suffusion of a determinate medium (the ontological syntax of the real) with "unbound telesis": the generative freedom/potential of the Void/Nun manifesting itself as consciousness: as dark energy/Nun expands, dark matter/Atum contracts: like a star the Pharaohs learned to stop their breathing, the systole and diastole of their being, but unlike at death when the self implodes into the dark well of its origin, the pharoah's breath hovers, poised inside itself like a sun, a halo.
This study is a joke lol, it’s been proven irrelevant to the discussion because they use a philosophically invalid definition of free will
Refer to the image
dont EVER talk shit about londonfrog you fucking cunt
>no based yawn poster...
Wtf is happening? Is it the end times?....
It didn't make him sleepy
Sentience is the ability to perceive one's environment, and experience sensations such as pain and suffering, or pleasure and comfort. 1. An animal that is sentient will have the ability to receive internal sensation and information from its environment, and then interpret this as an emotion.
I wonder how much the rat suffers ?
hey 5 o' clock wojack can you talk about Schelling more? I feel like Zizek et al. arent't giving him a fair treatment by shilling cultural materialism
Grant's book on Schelling is the best material out there right now imo. Happy to be proven wrong
Why?
THATS THE POINT.
the true dichotomy is faith and reason
soul and spirit are elements of the same black box.
synthesis of faith and reason is a black box, human consciousness, YOU-ness. You are not real considering your material components, but you have faith in the social-constructed in impression of you that is related to you by family, friends, and the mirror.
>Christ is to be detested as the herald of the annihilation of earth and the mechanization of man
Implying slavery over the will didn't preexist Christ by thousands of years. Faith is inborn. before Christ, people believed in things like the Roman Empire (not REAL in the materialist sense), a complete and total socially constructed network of nodes speaking in the same few languages: latin, denarii, and class. Christ gave Man a direction to apply his faith that kept him from allowing the pressure of civilization to drive him toward Death. An alternative language to undercut all manmade authority. He is the only antidote.
based and redpilled
Christ is both transcendence + anti-life, anti-praxis of the machine
Look at the cross. THE EMPIRE NEVER ENDED
Bump
exactly
the creative force that negates the limiting factors imposed by the machine (natural selection)
he replaces one machine for a more efficient one, while rejecting both. it's tricky
we laugh at the scholars but this is what they will leave behind.
Reading list for this feel? :(
This applies to almost all of Yea Forums
Actually to most of the internet desu
All you can do is individual self-individuation
Though honestly with media turning our civ to single consciousness once again it may not be such a bad thing. Society en masse may need the mother's womb once again before anything productive can happen, or perhaps that's the end. At any rate that seems to be the direction what with AI and mass media etc. that we're headed.
hiro feallaaawwsss hahah i love Neechee he is so kawaii!!!! (**)
ugguuuu in my panties!!!! THE PISS FLOOD COMMENCES
action ×woosh×××××××
my itty bitty sLave men drown in a puddle of my pussy piss and all the itty bitty tiny mean gurggle and gag my iggy gooey fluids and gulp and gulp in my big girl puddle.
Yeah, Nietzsche really does get me going.
He predicted complete change when society collapsed into a of nihilism by the death of God.
fuck i hate you so much. what are you going to do this for the rest of your life? its like you dont have the self awareness to see how offensive and aggressive you are.
It's just words nigga
first time posting in this with my new name. I changed from my old name to the english name because I believe it's a prettier form of dialogue thanks to reading these suicidal inducing God blaming stupid ass writing style.
>tfw you erase your line by line refutation because you realize this person's just too far beneath you for you to associate with
he probably gave up on this board
What book is pic from?
doubt