Nust finished reading The Dhammapada any other books on buddhist teachings i should check out or anything that...

Nust finished reading The Dhammapada any other books on buddhist teachings i should check out or anything that resonates with ur own philosophies and ideologies

Attached: 0890b9ccc0ea24b736db08fc84eeafaa.jpg (700x1110, 190K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DPZLSrfgimc
twitter.com/AnonBabble

you retards coudent tell what buddhism is if it came out your ass, the buddhism all you twats refer to comes from the Hīnayāna which is the shitty retarded version of the original doctrines compared with the Mahāyāna which stays way truer to the doctrines. You all are fascinated with a buddhism that is most likely the farthest and least familiar with any eastern doctrines aka not buddhism but some shit Westerners love to praise. As a student studying Traditionalism but more so the orientals i can't help but cringe everytime I see you discuss "Buddhism" its more so some-shit the Westerners took in and adapted to their imagination. You guys some chart (like pic-related) and become a Eastern monk and maybe even understand Buddhism itself? gtfo, read guenon's first book so you can get rid of your western prejudices

This, Buddhism is unironically basically just NeoVedanta, just stick with the original, read Adi Shankara

youtube.com/watch?v=DPZLSrfgimc

read Guenon's Introduction to the Study of the Hindu Doctrines first or else you will be left clueless with your western prejudice

true

Guenon is literally the only authority on the subject. Read him before ANY eastern text.

this but unironically

Buddhism Without Beliefs - Stephen bachelor

The Heart Of Buddha's Teaching: Transforming Suffering into Peace, Joy and Liberation - Thich Nhat Hanh

An End to Suffering: The Buddha in the World - Pankaj Mishra

The Buddha and the Sahibs: The Men Who Discovered India's Lost Religion - Charles Allen

Taking advice on buddhism, or any religion, from Yea Forums is not a great idea. The most basic understanding of any of the axial religions would lead you to conclude that lurking on the chans was a reprehensible activity.

>reading western bias anglo secular buddhism without any background in the indian traditions
lmao pseud

>hasn't attained any samadhi states or liberation in any sense and is criticising others on their knowledge of Buddhism

Go back to your books, philosopher.

>thinking that you can relate to these "Indian traditions" as anything other than a bunch of stuff you happen to like the idea of.

Buddhism/

modern day indians dont even understand their own traditions
read Guenon

at least they grow up with them and don't cherry pick them like some kind of glorified cultural tourism.

Hindutvas are the only true hindus left. Daily remember to kill all people who disrespect cows.

that's exactly what the west and the anglos did with buddhism kid
start with Introduction to the Study of the Hindu Doctrines lest you fall into the trap of western orientalism

this. Only western anglos who have read Guenon can understand the east. Modern indians are too far gone.

based

>that's exactly what the west and the anglos did with buddhism kid
damn he walked right into that one lmao

beliefs have to be more substantial than a bunch of stuff you happen to like the idea of.
Buddhism is more than an aesthetic.
You cannot relate to the "indian traditions" on anything other than an intellectual level

Read Guenon and you'll understand.

yea buddhism is more than an aesthetic
its a poor ripoff of guenon's teachings of vedanta and non-dualism, but with a bullshit "paradigm shift" of "oooh we don't talk about metaphysics here oooh we're so divorced from the tradition oooh"
thankfully mahayana recognized the absolute and recovered the true teachings of buddhism but it is still just a shit version of vedanta LOL

>but with a bullshit "paradigm shift" of "oooh we don't talk about metaphysics here oooh we're so divorced from the tradition oooh"
this it's basically the "not-this, not this" negation found in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad with an extra helping of identity crisis over babbies first muh apophatic theology

>thankfully mahayana recognized the absolute and recovered the true teachings of buddhism but it is still just a shit version of vedanta LOL
Also, true although Jonang Buddhism is based and realized the same truth as Advaita and is the crowning perfection of Buddhist thought (but even then Shankara is still better)

Shankara is nothing compared to guenon, idiot.

they're the same person

no Guenon is Amida Buddha

Why the proliferation o Buddhism threads on 4 chan all of a sudden?
Has the Land poster had some kind of quasi-mystical experience?
this is the least Buddhist place ever

they're probably gonna start to decline now that guenonposters have BTFO them

Because a bunch of clowns in undegrad got memed into believing muh buddhism is ancient empiricism and is proved by neuroscience according to Sam Harrisburg without even understanding that the whole thing is a weak Upanishad offshoot that is only salvageable or remotely worthwhile in the areas like Jonang and Ch'an which are steeped in Daoism, Tantra, etc

this desu

one hindu faggot who hates buddhism is sperging out and posting a dozen guenon/shankara threads and posts saying buddhism is just hinduism

>implying buddhism isnt just hinduism

>butt-blasted buddhafag in denial
Buddhism is just Hinduism

go away poo

reminder that it is just a shittier Vedanta anyways and therefore a useless denomination of Hinduism

Attached: buddhism .jpg (2712x5224, 3.67M)