A fictional character that

>is disgustingly undisciplined
>thinks he knows how humans function but probably doesn‘t know shit
>hates being social, feels drained by company
>frequently over-indulges in sensual pleasures like eating
>has zero empathy for people with victim mentality
>gives unsolicited advice
>thinks people around him are just too stupid to connect the dots
>want to be left the fuck alone 24/7
>doesn‘t drink/smoke/do drugs or engage in degenerate sexual behavior
>has insanely high standards for himself he can never reach
>hates physical intimacy with people he doesn‘t feel emotionally close
>doesn‘t feel emotionally close to anyone


So,Yea Forums which pro- or antagonist fits those criteria the closest?

Attached: 09C0DD6D-655E-480D-BFF8-72849CA0DBB9.jpg (727x1046, 125K)

Damn. Minus the concluding two bits (?) maybe Falstaff.

And the 'drained by company'

No. Not Iago either. Nor Edmund. Etc.

man from underground
guy from golden pavillion (maybe)
and unironically me

Taking notes here. Keep em coming anons.

>unironically me

I think people itt think this is some sort of a riddle. In fact i‘m just looking for a fictional character i can relate to to get me back into fiction.

literature is 60% neurotic characters like this, dive in, good luck

What if the character has to be female? Do neurotic females like this exist in literature?

I haven't read this in about six years so he probably ticks a few boxes that I'm forgetting.

Attached: 22594865289_c37ba2ffab_k.jpg (1280x1668, 382K)

Yes

Falstaff meets less than half of these criteria lol

Any examples?

Claude Frollo
He gets horny later on, but there is no sex.

Attached: Luc-Olivier_Merson_-_Frollo.jpg (564x829, 96K)

Hamlet is a perfect match for all of those except:

>>thinks he knows how humans function but probably doesn‘t know shit
>>frequently over-indulges in sensual pleasures like eating

He does know, but is also too puritanical for creaturely excess of any kind, not just the degenerate degrees of it. The rest fits perfectly, and even his bro Horatio, whose love of Hamlet is unrequited, is more of an amanuensis than a friend.

Minus undisciplined and unsolicited advice perhaps Desesseintes.

Came here to post this, can't radius the Ignatius

>Hamlet is also too puritanical for creaturely excess of any kind
It's most likely that Hamlet was originally played by a fat guy, the pale lanky Hamlet is a 19th century affectation that was cemented by 20th century luminaries of the English stage like Gielgud and Olivier.

>fat guy
too dexterous a swordsman, doubtful

>beheads you with the impact of an 80 pound arm

my diary desu

Post it

The Mistress of Wittgenstein

>*sigh*
doubtful

With a sword in hand obviosuly

No one in the play, Hamlet included, alludes to so much as a lapse of doting on pastry, though lanky Hamlet does happen to be a later slant that obviously contradicts the stamina and agility implied by the play's action.

I'm guessing something like 'with lightning swiftness' must also be implied too..
Well, dude, youve done it: Hamlet was unquestionably initially performed by a fat guy- not by by Burbage but by Kempe etc.