What am I in for?

What am I in for?

Attached: capital vol 1.jpg (387x600, 42K)

the best book ever written

read lenin mao and badiou after

>ayo gib me dat
read serious economists instead

19th century puns. A critical analysis of the appearance but not the substance of production. Base 12 maths. A couple of good insights into intensity and extension of labour.

Pay attention to what value is and how it must be realised (ie sold) to attain its potential embodied labour power as value.

Remember: value only exists in exchange as a flow, not as a substance while static. Increase the flow rate increase (potential) profit.

coats motherfucker

> Read books that came out 70-100 years later before
Makes a lot of sense buddy

Discovering that you've been lied to about Marx all your life.

But don't expect to change your mind about him or anything. It's still shit.

I'll give you one last chance Butterfly, and I think because you were flirting with me anyway, and since you are in your 30s you deserve a second chance.

You are not allowed to post unless I say it is okay. :3

If I say it is okay then you may post :3 this is how this coming week will be. Thank you in advance.

such as?

Metaphysics pretending to be economics.

It's more Linen than Lenin.

Xue Muqiao, Raul Prebisch and Leonid Kantorovich

So far so good. We'll see how this week goes. If you really are interested in me, butterfly, then you will follow what I say, as you have been.

This will be a very visual proof. When I give you permission, then you will immediately post showing that you've been listening and reading my posts. If you don't, it's over. :3

20 YARDS OF LINEN

Why not Mandel?

That's what capitalists do, though-and very successfully. This is precislely the problem.

an accurate depiction of life under capitalism
i was literally strangled by a banker last night so i think i'm going to read volumes 2 & 3

They were published posthumously

so were a lot of important works

Attached: 81HvxPDLPiL._AC_SX255_.jpg (255x272, 10K)

Stopping halfway through

Makes them better. Engels knows maths.

Wage labor is better read

"Once upon a time there was a man who wanted to buy a coat"

Its schematic

Circular logic, unclear terminology, rhetoric, religious fervour. A systematization and technical apologia of the utopian socialist impulse resulting in a laughably simplistic ideological view of human society and history that the pseuds on here confuse with insight.

>Dimisses """"""""rhetoric""""""""""
>Writes "A systematization and technical apologia of the utopian socialist impulse resulting in a laughably simplistic ideological view of human society and history that the pseuds on here confuse with insight."
God I hate intellectual posturers like you.

I don't dismiss rhetoric, neither religious fervour.

I've gotta agree. 'Wage Labour and Capital', being what could be considered the precursor of 'Capital', is a more straightforward essay which provides right about the same ideas but in a more compact form.
However, if one wants to delve into the gritty deeper theory, one should read Capital, even though reading 'WL&C' in advance wouldn't harm either.