Take the neoreaction pill. Finish the Fight

“We must recognise Burckhardt and Nietzsche as receivers of mnemonic waves [. . .] Both are very sensitive seismographs, which shake in their foundations when they receive and have to retransmit the waves.”- Aby Warburg

Burckhardt kept an ironic distance from the mnemonic spectres and wavemotions of pagan antiquity, Nietszche became the wave. Land claimed the wave actually came from the future. maybe there is no distinction between future and past. Would you rather be God or a professor at Basel?

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-05-05 at 10.46.59 PM.png (663x313, 100K)

i'm thinking in terms of cybernetics, the homogenous world-state (globohomo) vs its enemies(k-guerilla), its not a question of progress vs reaction but one of heterotopia vs homotopia. flow vs stasis. nietzche vs hegel

lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-Life/ThePsychologicalStructureOfFascism/ThePsychologicalStructureOfFascism.pdf

how will this happen though?

I like to mix my neoreaction with more pragmatic sensibilities and less optimism.

I like land I just feel the current corporate elite will further unify with the state which will only tighten its grip on the majority. Capitalism will perpetually dissolve everything while authoritarian culture to support the richest will coagulate things in a perpetual cycle.

>Age of Kings
not Kings but of Ceasar
and this is nothing new, Spengler said this in the 1920s already; kinda getting bored of all the "the x is nigh" sayers

It will happen because the concentration of wealth and power is inevitable during sustained periods of social cohesion. All the "leveling" periods of history, when there was more social mobility and where a greater percentage of the population had access to wealth and power, all came as a result of calamity: war, pestilence, and social disruption. When things settle down, concentration inevitably emerges, until you're left with both a new aristocracy and a new class of monarchs. It's happened, for example, in both China and Russia.

Meanwhile, democratic political systems inevitably decay into rule by a small few. This is what's happening right now in the United States. It's especially pointed because the US government was particularly designed to avoid concentration of power, yet it's happened anyway. The legislature has weakened while the executive has strengthened, and I don't think Congress could take back power from the Presidency if it tried. The inevitable result will be the emergence of a new authoritarian leader of the United States that maintains the trappings of republican government, as happened in Rome.

Attached: augustus.0.0.jpg (1200x800, 203K)

We realize that the American attempt at democracy ultimately failed, and if it can't work there it'll be even worse elsewhere.

The Presidency isn't really that powerful, it only has power when coordinating with the informal government. Compare Donald Trump trying to order the military to the border vs. the military being ordered to desegregate schools by force.

bump

based

Are ccru writings worth it?

yes

>its a 'wealthy class has enough money, time for monarchy' chapter
A monarchy requires a strong church to provide a priest-class that is able to legitimize a ruler into a monarch
Without that, its just aristocracy and despotism

Attached: 1546115138828.jpg (819x1428, 239K)

Idiot, just follow n1x, xenogothic, Justin Murphy. Remember Justin is really proud that there are a lot of trangender catholics in his discord server.

This

All the ballsacks. All of them

Attached: chop_your_balls_off.jpg (400x400, 25K)

>no priest-class

Pic related, a church

Psychiatry/therapy says take your meds and remember your mindfulness exercises

Attached: thm_columbia.jpg (1780x926, 907K)

Give me a quick rundown on this man. I see him posted in acc circles but know very little about him.

Runs a discord tranny server
In contact with Nick Land
Is a Fed
Crypto-humanist subverter

m.youtube.com/watch?v=yhLPzKonBBA