An Inconvenient Truth

Ah, much better

Attached: B7FD0AC4-9A7F-4322-A4E7-5FD749B2FD66.jpg (534x525, 51K)

based psycho

Attached: photo-1519575706483-221027bfbb31.jpg (1000x667, 42K)

why dont you two niggers add eachother on discord and stop posting on Yea Forums?

And you see no problem with this life denying phenomenon? What are we but our nature? Or are you a relgious low IQ worshiper?

Wtf mang

t. low IQ nigger

there are different aspects of our nature. there's the animalistic barbaric part and also the rational part. what's wrong with denying the first part? use your brain more dude jesus christ

>human nature
Well there's your problem, there isn't any such thing. Nor animal nature. Every event is entirely unique.

No, we are us. Every aspect of us. You can not make such a distinction without giving yourself up. And it is not rational to self-sacrifice, the herd drive is irrational.

Everything is genetic, take two identical twins and they will have the same persona. Willpower and other properties are heritable.

Fundamentally 'against' man's animal nature, true enough-- thereby making human society possible, also true. But also initiating certain powers ONLY possible within social human collectivities-- early publishing, for instance; modern techno-science, for another....
I really don't understand why little morons respond so predictably to Nietzsche's aesthetic forms of 'argumentation' or rather 'persuasion' --that smells really bad, user-- it reeks! --all these resenters (Ayn Rand completely follows him here), all these puling, cowardly resenters who, who, etc.
As fucking if.

I don’t mean to be creepy or anything. Really.

I mean, cmon, I’m helping you guys out in another post. Perhaps these are good mentalities to have.

Butterfly don’t worry you are still very smart I was just having a little fun ;_; I’m sorry.

Anyway, she liked that post until you started making fun of me for it (most likely). :3

People who decry morality lack an essential humane quality that makes humans human. Because they are too weak to behave according to morals they KNOW to be right, they have to invent opaque ideologies and psychobabble to "prove" (mostly to themselves) that it is their transgression that is actually behavior done in truth. You will notice that moral people do not feel the need to defend their behavior, that is because truth and divine law is as the Bible says written on the hearts of men.

>two twins will have the same persona
Your idea of "same" and "different" is very limited to believe this. Besides, genetics are also unique events. There are so many combinations it is stunning that you take the very small recent discoveries of scientists to mean that the mystery of our genes is solved. Stop watching t.v.

low iq biology denier
The complete opposite, say why do you follow moral commandments?

>brainlet who thinks he knows biology
Also a slab I bet

Ok, Master morality is the will to power turned outward upon others. It is the subversion of the Apollonian for the Dionysian. In order to express your master morality you dominate and subjugate others. Under your domination they turn their will to power inwards and express it as ressentiment, subverting the Dionysian for the Apollonian. Eventually this ressentiment leads to revolt and the fall of the masters as with the fall of the Romans. The slave devalues that which the master has and the slave does not, acts of strength and power become evil while acts of devotion and sacrifice become good and this becomes codified in the will of God. However, the quest for reason and science has led to the death of God in the minds of man. In order to reject nihilism and overcome the death of God, Man must become the Overman. The Overman is one who is beyond good and evil, beyond master and slave. He is the absence of morality and the fusion of the Apollonian and the Dionysian. You are still bound by your slave morality which is why you think in order to overcome it you must become a master, however such an act can only ever be life denying and never life affirming.

>Morality was invented
>Human nature not invented

So that’s how the center signifier works

OP rekt beyond belief

Attached: 927B8618-5810-4F66-8478-DE06E9172FA2.jpg (753x707, 331K)

Read it. Read it and weep :3

Based

No, you're actually wrong. See:
Nietzsche never talked about "Human Nature" or vouched to have the herd enslaved / killed.

>Ok, Master morality is the will to power turned outward upon others. It is the subversion of the Apollonian for the Dionysian

No, you just read "So Spoke Zarathustra" and you interpretedit wrong.

"What is good? -- All that heightens the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself in man. What is bad? -- All that proceeds from weakness. What is happiness? -- The feeling that power increases -- that a resistance is overcome.

Not contentment, but more power, not peace at all, but war; not virtue, but proficiency (virtue in the Renaissance style, virth, virtue free of moralic acid.) The weak and ill-constituted shall perish: first principle of our philanthropy. And one shall help them to do so. What is more harmful than any vice? -- Active sympathy for the ill-constituted and weak -- Christianity ...."

Don‘t worry, she still likes it because it gives her the attention she‘s after.

Attached: 39DC67C0-870A-4B07-BEF2-17BB9A5874E8.jpg (750x659, 64K)

She likes it because it makes her horny, okay? I like it when she does stuff for me in the spotlight, because it takes a lot of courage to do it. And she has done a lot of different things for me so far :3

>Nietzsche never talked about "Human Nature" or vouched to have the herd enslaved / killed.

You are so unbelievably wrong that my will to exterminate you Untermenschen was exacerbated.

>she has done a lot of different things for me
Like what?
And no, it doesn‘t get her horny. It satisfies her, yes. But not on a sexual level.

I've actually read Nietzsche so no point in trying this angle with me.

Let’s just play with the rules of your game.

If that which increases power is good, and if a situation should arise that sympathizing with the weak does so, then by your logic, it would be good.

Again, If that which increases power is good, and if a situation should arise that becoming a Christian does so, then by your logic, it would be good.

Hm

I call bullshit, man. She has masturbated to me a couple times, taken off her pants for me.

And now. Right now. At this very second. She is on the ground with her feet right by her ears slapping her sopping wet pussy. :3

It takes a lot of faith to believe she is. It takes even greater faith for her NOT to dash my hopes. And you and I both know that there have been many opportunities for her to dash my hopes. And she declined every time.

Attached: BED6A10B-701B-4157-B7BA-8F1C12548AC1.jpg (236x236, 6K)

Attached: 9B734E0D-2F9C-4858-9C09-99C6C50D260A.jpg (400x301, 15K)

Samefag :3

Same. Butthurt. Faggot.

I agree and only because i believe relativism to be correct when it comes to morals.

>And she declined every time.
Yeah, why would she discourage her beta orbiters? You‘re what gives her an ego boost. She‘s using you. So in a way, it‘s actually a win win situation. Just not the way you think it is.

Also, and to repeat myself: attention whores fake sexual arousal and desire to generate sexual arousal.
Her pussy might be wet, but her mental arousal is dusty with dryness.

It's OK, user, lots of people are too retarded to properly read Nietzsche. Nothing to be embarrassed about.

Holy shit we are cucking you so hard that you even admitted her pussy was wet.

Wow dude. Game over we win :3

>Nietzsche never talked about "Human Nature" or vouched to have the herd enslaved / killed.
"The weak and ill-constituted shall perish: first principle of our philanthropy"
"Menschliches, Allzumenschliches"
>and if a situation should arise that sympathizing with the weak does so
Why should sympathy strengthen your power? Sympathy is pain that arises when you look miserables, it is always a weakness.

>it’s a little bit of this, and a little bit of that, but neither is best. Oh, and god is dead now, goodluck.
>Can someone call my sister in, I soiled my white toga. ... She’s what? Talking to Heinrich about Jews? Again?
> MOOOOOM

*look at miserables

I said that because i don‘t know where you got that from in the first place. Maybe she sent you some pics, which would make you dismiss my statement on a whim. But you obviously have zero knowledge about human (in particular female) sexuality and the term arousal non-concordance is unfamiliar to you.

>The weak and ill-constituted shall perish
>this means we should ENSLAVE or KILL people en masse
It doesn't. Not that there is anything wrong with enslaving people, considering most people are slaves anyway (or killing the most resentful types, when necessary). You're still putting words into Nietzsche's books that aren't there.

>Wow dude. Game over we win :3

Attached: CE0F8C6E-6CF6-44BD-8E8B-719B16F83093.jpg (1240x1203, 99K)

Holy shit just read this stupid shit, ‘arousal non-concordance’?? Women aren’t some dungeons and dragons game buddy.

Given context, and absolute reliance on the 'herd network' to further his gospel, Nietzsche proved not only a whiner, but a poor sport..
On the other hand he does fairly spiritually 'anatomize' what each individual herdster craves: power. And openly speculates: is Christianity a religion or an excuse (not to attempt to wrest power)? If the latter proves true in any individual's life then Nietzsche is absolutely correct with respect to that individual's life; and if the majority of particular lives reflect that of the excuser's then he's correct in general as well. If not true religion, then what? Bureaucracy and the legislation of absolutely eveything? One fears that he's perhaps more than a little correct. Ultimately what he submitted was a challenge to his readers to be honest with themselves.

Wow, you‘re blowing me away with your debating skills and your well grounded arguments. It‘s almost like you‘re defeated.

Nietzsche talked a lot about slavery. If you had actually read him, would you know that he had endlessly praised slavery.

He lamented the values that were lost with the abolishment of different slavery systems. However, that doesn't mean he supported all implementations of it, "slavery as a whole."

>Why should sympathy strengthen your power? Sympathy is pain that arises when you look miserables, it is always a weakness.

Yea bro, look at this pathetic beta faggot giving in to weakness. So glad I read Nietzsche

Attached: 28361881-423E-4C64-9DD9-78C6F6604BE2.jpg (400x311, 61K)

"has so far been the work of an aristocratic society–and it will be so again and again–a society that believes in the long ladder of an order of rank and difference in worth between man and man, and that needs slavery in some sense or other"

He cries and is in pain, why should I not call him an pitifully man? How is something other than inferior?

wow youre being heartless on the internet i bet youre real tough

Ur talking to somebody who saw Little Miss Sunshine once and fashions themselves a master after buying Nietzsche pamphlet from Barnes and Noble

Sleek argument, this will surely convince me that a weeping faggot is a superior being.
You know it, no question.

That's not endless praise for slavery. That's an acknowledgement of what is necessary.

Nice strawman.

The Antichrist was only the first part of a planned full book length “Reevaluation of All Values”
It is indeed human nature to raise well behaved children. Just what “we’ll behaved” means is open to interpretation, but the Golden Rule seems to me to have been taught by mothers since before speech even developed.to treat others as you would have them treat you doesn’t necessarily submit oneself to weaknesses.
Mutual respect, cautious respect where one feels a need for it, seems to me an important missing chapter from this unwritten book.

Slander. Off topic

Based

Okay maybe you didn’t do that. I will admit, out of all the things I’ve posted today that might not be true.

You’re right. But you masturbated to me today, correct? :3

>That's not endless praise for slavery. That's an acknowledgement of what is necessary.
Ok, so it is advocacy for slavery.
>treat others as you would have them treat you
Name one line of Nietzsche which supports such a thing even rudimentarily. Nietzsche rejected all universalism

There's really nothing worse than a soppy Christcuck.

I’m advocating it.
Why does everything have to be such fierce competition with men? It’s time to reevaluate.
Yes, since the Bible reappropriates it, Nietzsche will dismiss it as a weakness. I’m not calling for “universalism” either. I mention caution after all

Attached: F73D04F1-45E1-4D1C-B67D-A6C5EC42A3BE.jpg (420x263, 21K)

This never happened. The newspaper article was fake, google it.

>Ok, so it is advocacy for slavery.
Sure.

>Name one line of Nietzsche which supports such a thing even rudimentarily.
One could make the argument that he holds this sentiment towards other Hyperboreans. In TSZ, he instructs his disciples to strive against him.

>Why does everything have to be such fierce competition with men?
Because that‘s their deepest nature. Females are also competitive, but not in every situation - like men do.

Yet again I find myself agreeing and disagreeing with parts of your post. Let’s see what we have to work with

>Why does everything have to be such fierce competition with men?
It’s Satan. Just trust me everything will be explained in due time, but it’s Satan.

> It’s time to reevaluate
Agreed.

>Yes, since the Bible reappropriates it, Nietzsche will dismiss it as a weakness
So, simply because it is from the Bible, Nietzsche will dismiss it? Seems somewhat random and nonsensical.

>I’m not calling for “universalism” either. I mention caution after all
You have to have all these caveats and second wordings because Nietzsche is aphoristic. I’ve invested a lot of my time in existentialist philosophy, as should most people who believe in God. Kierkegaard is better because he talks about a spirit, and the relation between it and your body, and the infinite as well. This infinite many NeoPlatonists know as God. Your infinite is an infinite confusion of missed sayings.

Unity is infinite, like a circle, self-subsisting, never destroying or regenerating. That is life, and God. Your morality regenerates and destroys itself continually. This is not healthy for your soul. :3

BROOOOOOOOOpleaseSTOP

Attached: 4C4BD791-4091-4ECA-84DE-8AAA6E7C6974.jpg (560x560, 302K)

Why doesn’t she deny it then? :3

FAKE NEWS

>Why does everything have to be such fierce competition with men

"The weak and ill-constituted shall perish: first principle of our philanthropy" - Nietzsche

Of course it is. There has to be aggression in a negative system :3

Because she started this and is embarrassed to acknowledge that and thinks that if she ignores it you everything will just go away, welcome to vagina world

Because she has decided to ignore you instead of feeding you. She has already grown OVERtired of you. Idk why she doesn‘t just drop the trip to avoid you. Strong indicator that she loves feeling like a lit-celeb. Which is attention whore tier behavior.

Human nature is a spook

A friendly competition is also in our nature. But cooperation runs even deeper.

>Kierkegaard
Get thee to a nunnery
Why do I have to den every fucking post of yours? All of its lies. Shut the fuck up

She already responded to one of my posts in another thread.
You’re a fucking retard. I’m showing you HOW ITS DONE. Meanwhile you are sitting on the sidelines like a little babby. :3

Butterfly just admit you masturbated this morning for me, thanks.

But will they be made weak by constant combat or their own stupidity?

Yes and no. Not trying o be a celeb

>A friendly competition is also in our nature
False. This is a construction.

>Why do I have to den every fucking post of yours?

You don’t have to at all, but it would be nice to tell the truth sometimes.

Butterfly I have some questions for you.

One. Why did you leave last night after I posted proof you said you were in your thirties.

Two. Why would you hide the fact that you’re in your thirties at all???

Three. You never did deny it before today. We are running out of room.

Here is the pattern

I depend on you
You let me down
I depend on you
You let me down
I find a reason to depend on you
You notice the reason too and let me down

Here you can see a problem, a flaw perhaps, with morality? It’s one of the reasons why what is going on today is even going on. Believe it or not, you are the one behaving incorrectly. You have been repeatedly masturbating to me, and you know you have. As a result though, now you take the time to come and ‘give them what they want’. Trust me, this could have gone a lot better, and it will, but this will have to be necessary to see why you need to change.

I repeat. You need to change how you behave. Thank you. :3

>Yes and no
I am not a bottom feeder butterfly. I do not like you agreeing with him at all here. You should probably fix that :3

Someone IP range ban this fucking retard already.

>get butthurt and publically own

B-b-ban range p-please

Shut up fuckhead. No one loves you.

>But cooperation runs even deeper.
Yes, but not with everyone, only people sharing your dna.

>Not trying o be a celeb

Then drop the trip

The lion who catches the gazelle does not hold a grudge to the lion who tripped and fell while lu going for the same meat, nor will he deny him a bite of his prize.
Now get a trip so we can filter (Do you all understand this?)

>I depend on you
You let me down
I depend on you
You let me down
I find a reason to depend on you
You notice the reason too and let me down

You're starting to see it. I‘m proud of you user! I‘m sorry to have sowed the seed of doubt in your soul, but i did so for your own good.

Attached: 8807A824-2AC2-4FBF-B435-3328B43A2F24.jpg (1200x1055, 422K)

That won’t make him go away.

Ok, i don‘t get that. Can you elaborate?

That‘s true. But it would make it harder for him to stalk you and it would also not make everyone instantly think about this embarassing stuff when you‘re trying to have a serious argument.

No no no. You do not understand. You need to depend on others in order to live. Have you seriously never depended on a woman before to do the right thing? How sad.

Right. I am the lion, you are the gazelle. Now I can understand how you might have thought it was reversed.

HOWEVER (and this is particularly important) that little sequence right there is not supposed to be how it works. But your mind I understand is not rare. You have been conditioned (and You will see why) to believe that, for whatever reason, me depending on you is cringey.

Now it isn’t, but here’s the part that’s goin to be particularly hard for you to do;”: you have to understand HOW it isn’t cringey, then you may proceed. :3

You see, you are a human being and I can relate. It’s how I know you’re lying. It’s how I’ve been getting you to do these things. Because we share emotions.

Because we were created by God. :3

You’re just butthurt you got publically owned

>however such an act can only ever be life denying and never life affirming.
I think that's wrong desu. He claims the master and roman virtues to be life affirming, so if you try to become master then its life affirming as it is the persuit of will to power.

>You need to depend on others in order to live
This is true. However; fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me, is also true.

I don‘t feel like i got publicly owned today anywhere.

So what? You just go from woman to woman hopping around until someone does what you want?

I think not. I believe we should WORK with people and they will warm up to us eventually. If you slowly progress around someone l, that is a good thing indeed. Not everything is going to happen all at once. :3

The bird eats the bugs off the rhinos back. Life isn’t all about brutality.

Anonymity is a clown car cult of fools

Attached: 1AEF48B9-5F39-4F40-8472-6DEBED055EB3.jpg (254x400, 24K)

I’m starting to think that you‘re doing this as satire. If so, chapeau mon amie.

Sure you don’t. That’s why you made that post :3

>white people
>herd
You are thinking of the middle east. The only herds that are forming in white-majority countries are related to idealism and not blood. Some white groups are pro and some against morals.

Attached: 1535039640563.jpg (821x1059, 189K)

Oh no. I am completely 100% serious. I have depended on women in the past and I will in the future. If you only need women to depend upon you, that is pathetic and embarrassing. :3

Butterfly you aren’t being clever, you’re being stupid. If only you could see how you’re supposed to act. If only I could open your eyes :3

I don’t get this at all. Your interested in philosophy AND a cringey beta-orbiting stalker?

Attached: 36D64B1D-6625-45B6-963D-90010CA386DE.jpg (1300x922, 87K)

>The bird eats the bugs off the rhinos back. Life isn’t all about brutality.

No, it isn‘t. It‘s all about personal benefits. The bird doesn‘t pick the bugs off the rhino to help him. It does so because they‘re his food. It‘s just a convenient coincidence that those two needs (eating bugs/getting rid of bugs) happen to fuse into a win win situation.

>Again, If that which increases power is good, and if a situation should arise that becoming a Christian does so, then by your logic, it would be good.
Nietzsche makes several points about that, the priest is the only one that lies between the "god" and human and the gatekeeper of truth, giving him power over people. The great lie that he talks about chirstianity is that people think its not made to give certain people power when in fact the whole religion was created by the will to power of some.
Wanting to become priest and embracing a religion is also a form of will to power, to control other people, but a dishonest one and whose values become life denying to other people. So it works like an infection.

>he lets women go the second they are mean to him
You’re not just a beta, you’re a fucking pussy :3

I need my family to depend on and have them depend on me, not some random tripfag on lit.

That looks like an interesting book

It‘s called dignity my son. You should try it some day.

I’m just saying. The women you are interested in you should depend on.

Period. :3

See
Try that someday. It works. And it’s working. And she knows it.

Yes, ofc. But you need to chose wisely who that woman will be. She‘s not it in your case, believe me.

Attached: 152607C9-B8C2-492E-948C-6B471EE0DCDD.jpg (440x386, 37K)

And why not? Because all the virgins and fucking losers on here (most of you) throw a temper tantrum when she is obviously doing awesome things for me?

Cute :3

I‘m the same user btw

Very good answer.

I’m sure you are. Makes sense to me :3

No, because she has tried to tell you to let her the fuck alone several times already, ignoring you the rest of the time. She‘s sick and tired of you. Idk why you cling to her so desperately, but a whole board is cringing in your stead right now.

>this fucking thread, all of it
Thanks a lot Nietzsche.

He is a troll, yes. He does it to annoy everyone, not just me.
NOW WHOS THE ATTENTION WHORE?

And another thing: the idea of ‘fighting over women’ is just fucking stupid. It just is stupid in general. You see this mentality espoused by many people, most of all Nietzscheans.

Now I don’t know about you Butterfly but I don’t remember them being this into Nietzsche before you and I started flirting do you?

Pretty fucking cringey if you ask me.

Next time I ask you masturbate B.B. I’ll make sure you’re not in a restaurant ;3

I’m not doing it to annoy you. Are you not interested in me ? :3

I‘m starting to see, yes.
Maybe i misinterpreted you. But you‘re still an attention whore for tripping.

That is an amazing point

Naw. Originally I didn’t even have the trip.
I just wanted to talk about Nietzsche.
You read him?

Obfuscating the role of the priest to the theology he preaches is not a coherent critique of Christianity. Back to the drawing board

Do you have feelings for me or not butterfly. Answer the question :3

Then why did you get one?
I‘ve just started beyond good and evil, so i can‘t say i have, no.

So she can be identified past the innumerable hordes that rotate through here. I have to keep on reminding people about the awesome shit she’s done already every time they forget, for instance :3

Positively exquisite, indeed

Attached: serveimage-7.jpg (612x861, 198K)

>for instance
I‘m listening

Keep. It’s bound to happen again :3

Thanks for ruining the thread fags.

Na dann mein freund

It was a thread about Nietszche. The thread was ruined from the start.

Or to speak more generally, it is the more you connect it with Darwin and social Darwinism as butterfly seems to be trying to do. :3

Early budding professor/composer/poet Nietzsche >>>>> Late schizo NEETzsche

Attached: 83FE19AA-6366-41BF-909E-BAF8BBB8DB67.jpg (612x861, 182K)

Looks like Liszt in the thumbnail

Attached: serveimage-6.jpg (660x440, 173K)

>ruined from the start
Yes. Yes it was.
>:33333333333333333333333333333
And this is why. It's exactly Nietzsche's ubermensch crap that makes idiots into obnoxious solipsists. At least Nietzsche is enjoyable to read.

Attached: creepy.jpg (708x590, 40K)

>jealous
:3

Zero positive feelings, you bore.

I was anonymous for years on various Yea Forums board, and I got “internets” for my posts all the time, but I still felt lonely and alienated. I pulled some nonsense out of an old Zalgo thread and put it in the name field when I came to lit, to fit in maybe, but I felt better. Tripless for a few years there.
I’ve only read Kaufman’s Portable Nietzsche, a sizable chunk of his work, bu I don’t pretend to be a know it all. Happy reading.

Salvage it. Respond to on topic remarks.

Definitely. Dude was 26 when he became a professor of philology

The ubermensch's testament.

>Zero positive feelings, you bore
Okay fine. I’ll fuck off if you admit you lied about your age. :3

After all, it’s no biggie on my end. You are a lesbian, after all.

Just admit you lied about your age and we can move on :3

>but I still felt lonely and alienated
And does tripping help you with that? Genuine question.

Hello Butterfly? I know it can take you a bit to respond but I just need a quick confirmation you indeed are in your 30s and we’re good. :3

>A trolls caveat
I was mistaken about my age. We’ve been all over this

It may be what helps. I do it for myself primarily.
I am anonymous enough like this for my own purposes.

>Obfuscating
If anything its been made more clear than ever. And it serves as a good critique to Christianity since it shows their dishonest behaviour.
The role of priest to the theology as its written is a mere symptom your are looking at made do decieve you. The priests are not even honest to themselves let alone other people.

I wasn’t trolling. I mean you’re in your thirties, correct? I mean, that was the only reason I was interested in the first place. How is pic related not an admission of your in your thirties?

I mean let’s be real for a second, pic related is not the only post you made. In all honesty, you literally LED ON that you were in your thirties when you are like 46??? You forgot your birth date by three years? I mean cmon no way.

I caught you in a big lie. A really big lie and you just don’t want to admit it. :3

Sorry I got the pic

Attached: 88E81D8E-D5A5-4978-9D18-499F5EB212E5.jpg (750x427, 266K)

Holy fuck, why are you so obsessed with her age?

Okay so Butterfly are we at an impasse? Impassable terrain for you?

I think I see a problem: a personality flaw with you, perhaps a reason why you are so single and alone?

No matter what you don’t want to tell the truth and you are deathly afraid of admitting you were wrong or incorrect.

To make it short: you are a habitual liar. A complete and utter habitual liar. You constantly lie. That’s all you do. And then if someone calls you what you are: a liar, you get upset.

I can think of another thing that needs to change with you.

Women in general as well, but mostly you because I have met many women who do not lie so often.

You’re fucking weird too man, you’re lying about your age UPWARDS, who the fuck does that?? :3

Who cares WHY? You are asking th wrong questions. To tell you the truth my motive is simple: the truth. If she is lying I do not like that. Obviously either way she did a bad thing, but if she lied upwards about her age that is very strange. :3

As the story goes, Jesus Christ was a Jew. The philosophy he went about preaching was as he said a fufilling of the Law, and the New Testament is filled with instances of how Jesus fulfilled the prophesies and was therefore the messiah that the Old Testament prophesied about. Now here’s why I bring that up: Jesus was a Jew but yet he deeply against the Pharisees, the Rabbis in power at the time because of what he saw as the corruption of the Law. Jesus himself, unlike you, recognized the difference between the faith and the corruption of it. Nietzsche was trying to be Jesus, from the beginning to end. His Anti-Christ, Zarathustra, Twlight of the Idols, Hammer time, would all qualify as an example of a Use and Abuse of History.

If i hadn‘t promised to not say „told you so“...

It‘s just a damn shame that you‘re seeking the fault in everyone else again instead of taking responsibility for your own shortcomings and failures. Even worse, you‘re using it as fuel to further nourishing your bitterness towards women as a whole. Deeply saddening to whiteness but probably inevitable.

I'm your psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, please tell me why you're doing this? Hard mode: do not once mention butterfly in your explanation, not even gesture at them.

Attached: freud.jpg (220x299, 12K)

No need to mindlessly stick up for a liar.

This is a solid post. :3

Because I’ve exposed a liar

People will claim to agree with the OP and then turn around and promote anti-globalism. Think about that for a minute.

Attached: 098C1480-F4E1-4A57-8A4C-BB59E8FC9200.jpg (201x251, 14K)

I‘m sticking up for people using their own shortcomings to fuel hatred for women.

Shortcomings? What shortcomings?

Pro tip: depending on women is not a shortcoming. :3

Are you on the spectrum? It's not just these posts.

Seriously think about this. All I’m asking for her to do right now is either confirm or deny she’s in her 30s and she can’t even respond or do anything. Absolutely ridiculous.

If she maintains 46, whatever I’m out either way, but I thought I’d ask the question to just determine this shit once and for all.

I thought maybe once instead of INTIMATING the truth she’d fucking tell it. That’s not my shortcoming. I don’t accept the fact that women lead people on, Id rather label that as a shortcoming for them. :3

Yes, yes it is. You shouldn‘t depend on an entire gender. Depending on a fee specific woman is not a shortcoming in any way. But what you do? Undeniably, yes.

>she
OH NO NO NO!!!!

She‘s not responding because you‘re being ridiculous. If she would respond, she‘d cave to your shit and accelerate your autism.

>in power at the time because of what he saw as the corruption of the Law
Law of who? Law of those in power? What the fuck are you even talking about, Jesus himself is a form of will to power by the weak who thought they were the choosen people.
>Nietzsche was trying to be Jesus, from the beginning to end. His Anti-Christ, Zarathustra, Twlight of the Idols, Hammer time, would all qualify as an example of a Use and Abuse of History.
Nietzsche doesnt deny that and was honest that his works were also a will to power. He wasnt trying to be Jesus as he didnt believe in same level of objective universal truths as religion makes it out to be or didnt try to create them in order to give him more power over people. He is even more sincere than "Jesus" on that regard.
This doesnt even have anything to do with the subject in matter. I tackled the behaviour of the priests and how religion is made on their self interest and needs of power, while you come and give me a lecture about the story of the religion that hasnt anything to do with the subject and is filled with dishonest lies.

No.

Attached: 9F765D1E-2A48-4284-B8FC-EE7547AAAEF6.jpg (1200x650, 165K)

I’m not depending on an entire gender. This is a very odd post. Clearly I am not allied with the ‘female gender’ :3 I fight battles with them all the time.

To be honest a lot of the mentalities I have go against the contemporary woman, as you can see. I even stated that was why this is happening. Women can be a real source of evil. :3

I don’t think she wants some random fuck talking for her. That is cringey beyond belief, Virgin :3

Oh fuck, now even your reading comprehension vanished.

Imagine being this deep in youtube philosophy.

Read a book, and not the backside of one.

... but a yes on the 30s?

Why habitually say the same thing over and over again when you know I’ve proven the contrary? its almost as if simply because it doesn’t ‘’’’feel’’’’ right, that you’re just stuck and set in a certain track. If you do something outside of this set track what would happen? Would you change the world? Who knows? Not you because you’re stuck doing the same thing. :3

Okay well I don’t depend on the female gender. How about that.

You said I depend on the female gender. I say I don’t.

Reminder that children can't be the Ubermensch.

Oh what a hypocrite you are

So you don’t even deny you’re a virgin? Lol.

So no Napoleon or Peter Pan. Got it.

confero.ep.liu.se/issues/2016/v4/i1/160111/confero16v4i1_160111.pdf

Attached: FE329BB2-B72C-404D-BB1E-0CB5066A3584.jpg (960x600, 53K)

It‘s no use with you

That quote reads like it could be from a 13yo girl on fb

I’m just saying how you are literally behaving is wrong. Just saying you should change. Do you comprehend that or not?

Napoleon wasn't a child.

I think that was a manlet joke

But to add to that, Zarathustra says that there has not been any overmen yet.

Elaborate please

Says you

Pippi is a fictional character
And Zarathustra was set in ancient times, not the 21st century. Not to claim there’s an Uebermensch now

>Says you
When does Pippi Longstocking exhibit the camel and the lion of the spirit?

>Elaborate please
You just say the same lies over and over like habitually lying about being fucking 46 years old? Anyway I’m done with you. This is it. My last post here. Goodbye.

Utterly btfo

Fair enough.

Nietzsche still sucks ideologically.

>"But the Jews are without any doubt the strongest, most tenacious, and purest race now living in Europe"
I too love Nietzsche

What‘s his definition of pure in this context?

Ever known a Jew personally? They can be cutthroat. There's definitely something about them.

>Law of who? Law of those in power?

Attached: BD3F9322-0689-4F4A-B854-484B462A936A.jpg (640x845, 108K)

>let me give you a talk about muh Jesus himself and how he wanted things bucko.
The moment someone needs to make a that vague, offtopic explaination like he did the discussion is dropped.

Attached: 1550538007135.jpg (478x539, 94K)

I don’t think she does. I think this is Lindgren’s intent. She’s literally the Child.
Napoleon is more of a lion, no?

And you are the camel.

This isn’t a discussion it’s a circle jerk, and no I’m not gonna use your categories cuz, SUPRISE, I disagree with your views
>discussion is dropped
Boo hoo

>I think this is Lindgren’s intent.
Well, if it is, then Lindgren was being intentionally reductionist... the camel and lion stages are very vital to understanding the child. Otherwise, you really are just left with a literal child, and children are quite powerless in the world.

>Napoleon is more of a lion, no?
I'd say a child who continued to have to play the role of lion and who was never able to fully embrace the child. Zarathustra almost says as much about himself, as well, so we can type Nietzsche the same way I think.

>person explains how priests made the holy lie to make people see them as the gatekeepers of truth and how they are dishonest
>"n-no, thats not a valid critique" then goes on a sperging about Jesus and giving vague ass ideas that had nothing to do with the topic
>"SUPRISE, I disagree with your views"
Tell me about it, everytime the christcuck is unmasked and shown their true intentions they proceed to give a vague statement about jesus and beat around the bush.

Attached: 1549636553510.jpg (500x625, 48K)

Yes, there's sheeplets. What's next step? Own a business? Convert to Judaism? Tell us something new.

>a children’s book
>reductionist
>cage-ya don’t say.jpg
Pippi came whole off the boat as the Child, and clearly was not powerless.

>Pippi came whole off the boat as the Child
Zarathustra's conception of the child doesn't work like that though. Camel and lion are prerequisite stages. I just don't see that children's story being a strong representative of the idea.

Attached: quote-he-who-would-learn-to-fly-one-day-must-first-learn-to-stand-and-walk-and-run-and-climb-friedri (850x400, 61K)

I don’t think you understand a few things...

I think that I do.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teasing

Okay.

Bye now

Attached: C8E65798-BF09-459F-92BA-AC10C08241F2.jpg (1000x541, 114K)

Why do men always have to give everything a sexual undertone...

>Okay. Bye now
lol, my wife's exact phrasing.

Zarathustra: "But how could I think of being just through and through? How can I give each his own? Let this be sufficient for me: I give each my own."

nietzche needed to read the protestant ethic.

Western industrialisation and capitalism is nowt but a reification of protestant idealism