Why is Pantheism so based, fellas?

Attached: Pantheism.jpg (800x710, 474K)

Because the multiplicity of entities is bullshit and anybody who takes a minute to think about it will understand why, that's why

what

This level of persuasive argumentation is the reason why I return to "Yea Forums - Literature".

Einstein was a pantheist

AUTHENTICALLY BASED

>Because the multiplicity of entities is bullshit
by that token you are bullshit

It's because its true.

God is the Supreme Truth and Highest Reality.
In His own timeless dimension God exists all alone, as the unified totality of existence.

However, He also thinks(or dreams). And we are merely His Thoughts.

Being a divine thought means that in some sense, you yourself are God, as God is All.

The purpose of life then, is to realize this.

well shit, you just summed it up in 6 sentences. What am i supposed to do for the next 60 years you fuckin prick?

this is why deleuze is trash

I don't get what is so great about pantheism. Panpsychism, however, seems like the ethical default.

claims of the metaphysical existing or non-existing status of any entities or essence at all are assumptions and nothing more, nevermind claims about oneness vs multiplicity

That's just your assumption man.

>The purpose of life then, is to realize this.
Surely the mere realization of this idea is not the end. It’s not as if we are made completely aware of what God actually is, just as we know that 2 + 2 = 5. God would not be satisfied with this mere superficial knowledge

the entire field of metaphysics is just dick-stroking
any metaphysical claims one way or another are unfalsifiable conjecture

live blissfully

pantheism is gay
everyone knows that [specific sect of one religion] is the only true source of knowledge on creation, life, morality, and death
I know this because I happened to be born into it and indoctrinated from a young age
[deity] be praised

not that guy but implied in his statement was union consequent with that knowledge

>le unfalsifiable maymay

back to /sci/ bugbrain, go fuck a calculator

Ah yes, I actually have accepted mysticism but didn't want to go into that ITT right off the bat.

The thing with mysticism is if people can see God, why doesn't it happen frequently or you can't just see for your self? Well, it could be that it is a difficult and arduous path to tread upon to reach your goal...

only if its an idealist form, materialist forms of pantheism are basically just "wow bro I love science and nature"

materialism is unfalsifiable too
materialism is a metaphysical claim based on conjecture

PANTHEISM IS ILLUMINISTIC MATERIALISM.

well classical theism is kinda panthesitic
so theres quite the literature supporting it

also panthesim=/=immanence all the time

There isnt a dichotomy between Transcendence and Immanence

non-dualism > panentheism < pantheism

Attached: 1555579578390.jpg (640x960, 189K)

It’s not, and if you ever understand the first 1000 years of western thought you would know why.
Short short short version, disregarding paradox’s of motion, and lots of other things: to:dr there must be a first cause, singular.
This.

It's not, It's litteraly brainlet's first attempt to answering serious questions.

So what's brainlet's second attempt?

...

Attached: IMG_7758.jpg (327x499, 28K)

*> >

And finally, what's the third? Do they get it right?
>3rd time's the charm

No they don't.
Nobody does.

Attached: IMG_7759.jpg (333x499, 44K)

So what is there to do?

Try again.
Then You discovered that trying in itself is the answer.
Then your cock starts to glow with the power of the galaxy.
It's pretty kino.

Based. I thought you might go there
Carry on, fren

You too, kind user.

And there we have it, we arrive back at pantheism

>Do they get it right?
That's a stupid question after attempt 2, kiddo, and you should know why.