I don't want to read him. I want to refute him.
Which philosophers btfo of this pedantic goblin?
I don't want to read him. I want to refute him
Aiden Howard
Asher Anderson
have some respect for Kant or fuck off and off yourself
Kevin Gomez
Schopenhauner B his dialectic TFO plenty. Kant's moral and political philosophy is downright retarded.
Christian Howard
Schopenhauer considered his philosophy a continuation of Kant, he just corrected what he considered Kant's goofups
Nicholas Russell
Hegel
Jose Ward
hasn't read Schopenhauer
has read Schopenhauer
Hegel didn't understand Kant
Leo Perez
You are the pedantic goblin right now, and one belonging to the fucking moronic category among the community of pedantic goblins.
So you better take 's suggestions, you miserable clown.
William White
You aren't really answering anyone by doing that.
Wyatt Anderson
there were no questions being asked, just false information being spread
Christopher Bailey
Kierkegaard is always the answer
Benjamin Mitchell
Why don't you read
Nicholas Edwards
This. OP is either a child or a brainlet.
Isaac Hill
this is the most thorough critique of kant you'll find anywhere. coupled with whitehead's insights, it helped me de-program the Kantian mind virus
but I know you won't read it because you're a posturing memelet
Evan Allen
If you try and shit on his epistemic works, you're gonna have a bad time. But stuff like the categorical imperative needs no refuting, because it's so self-evidently wrong.
Hudson Walker
>Which philosophers btfo of this pedantic goblin?
Don't read philosophers. Study science to btfo him.
Camden Hughes
GOODLUCK
Charles Adams
This is the wrong way to do philosophy. Have an open mind.
Samuel Barnes
Strawson discusses his epistemology
Rawls discusses his ethics
Sellars discusses his theory of perception and metaphysics
Xavier Thompson
You aren't having an open mind when you dismiss his points. You are in fact failing to satisfy your demands for philosophy.
Leo Johnson
That's what I'm saying. Someone who wants to learn philosophy can't just ignore the truth based on their preferences. I think Hegel is a fucking moron, but I'm still going to read the Phenomenology because it's my intellectual duty to give the man a chance.
Tyler Turner
>Thinking you can challenge the based God
You don't even know the first thing about synthetic a priori knowledge. Get dabbed on
Hudson Hernandez
if you want to refute him, you're going to have to read him
Ryder Adams
>Mfw I finally understand that time and space are I D E A L F O R M S O F I N T U I T I O N A P R I O R I
Noah Gutierrez
Dude what the fuck?
Grayson Flores
>I want to refute someone smarter than me
Luke Sanchez
The only way to avoid Kant as a 21st century westerner is to read guenon and convert to islam.
Gabriel Martinez
It's either this or only read Pico della Mirandola's 900 theses and spend your life as a Platonic/Aristotelian Pan-Mediterranean syncretist
Ryan Flores
>Hegel is a fucking moron
>hasn’t read Phenomenology
William Mitchell
Kant states all minds will never know things in themselves, they part of the noumenal realm. Kant cannot see other minds they are part of noumenal realm.
Camden Nguyen
how could I not know about it if it's a priori
Easton Barnes
>Three distinct points connected by straight lines make a triangle
That's synthetic a priori knowledge. You have the knowledge, you just don't think about it in those terms. The name for it comes from your experience (reading Kant) but the knowledge itself can be gained without it