Whenever corporate demands female variant of established male cartoon characters, it’s always done like this:
>skin-colored fur/feathers
>wears clothes, even if the male doesn’t
>hair extension ontop of fur/feathers
>has breasts or pseudo-breasts to drive home that this character is indeed female
>in some cases, a more humanoid face
>normal human voices
Why?
Goes back to pre-sound and black-and-white cartoons when female character design had to be more distinctive so that the audience wouldn't just mistake them for male characters
What you said doesn’t make sense to me. Putting eyelashes on characters and making them behave flamboyantly feminine was the old way to tell the audience the character was female.
A good example would be Minnie Mouse. Mickey wore a pair of shorts, Minnie wore a skirt, the latter didn’t have hair extensions and didn’t speak “normally”, she had a unique accent to complement Mickey’s own accent. Disney didn’t take Mickey Mouse’s template, gave him an hourglass figure and dress, slapped some hair on him and hired some mundane actress to provide her with an equally mundane voice.
You know perfectly well it's so the audience can tell they're female, How would you differentiate the characters visually, put a sign on their backs that says GIRL?
I'M GONNA FUCK THAT DUCK
Which one
Just have them speak or refer to themselves as a girl once, or simply give them a feminine name. The audience isn’t stupid.
Minnie Mouse doesn’t
uncreativity
Did Duffy have as much game as Bugs in Space Jam? Or is it just a female character and Duffy is still a fucking loser compared to everyone else?
Eyelashes
user you know even adult ducks can be yellow like Tina right?
Those aren't adult ducks, look at the feathers they're still covered in down
So what you're saying is that Tina is jailbait.
sometimes. Anime REALLY looks dull.
Left is anthro, right is kemonomimi. Also, I hate this. At least make them all one or the other.
Human beauty standards
sisters in the french dub
youtu.be
brothers in the english
youtu.be
odd?
Made for a human audience. Tina is a bad example of this because Daffy is about as humanoid as her. Many male cartoon characters have human pectorals and muscles so it only makes sense that their female counterparts have human breasts and slim figures.
Lowest common denominator anime #15790339042.
Japan’s animation industry truly is creatively bankrupt.
>female variant of established male
>to drive home that this character is indeed female
^This, you answered your own question.
Basically it all goes back to the fact that human society is and always has been dominated by men, so lots of female characters are just there to be love interests and look pretty. All too often, their entire character boils down to being female.
I would totally fuck Tina up the ass
cont.
>most if not all famous, influential cartoonists from the past were male, and even today things still haven't changed that much in spite of the wokeness
>for that reason, there's more male important, established cartoon characters than female ones (write what you know and all that, also in the past there probably wasn't much demand for family-friendly female protags from the male part of the audience aka the only part that really mattered)
>men are seen as the default gender, so male cartoon characters are allowed to look, sound and act as androgynous/feminine as their creators desire, and still be perceived as male (kind of like all animals are a "he" until proven otherwise), but the females need something extra (long eyelashes, hair, girly color scheme, etc.) to establish their gender and differentiate them from their male counterpants who usually were also created first.
>male nudity is seen as less sexual (at least from the male POV), so the male characters are allowed to wear fuck all more often than their female counterpants.
>males are obsessed with sex and the female form, so female designs created by straight men who aren't forced to self-censor (also female and gay character designers inspired by their craft) often wind up more humanoid and sexualised, especially when those female characters exist for the sole purpose of being a love interest to the creator's self-insert (same reason why "hot wife ugly husband" and pic related are such popular tropes) or eyecandy for the male part of the audience.
>female charas are also rarely allowed to be funny. You can't make them ugly and goofy cause look above, you can't go too hard with jokes and slapstick because female suffering hits different and sb will get offended. In the past, they were often one-dimensional cookie cutter support characters (female relatives & love interests), nowadays they have to be feminist mary sues, especially if they're a token fem chara created by a guy.
shut the fuck up
Come on Daffy bang that duck whore,
So am I that duck whore girl that is a thresome in that case? we mustn't forget to include Double Penetration.
One day I'll make this exact series and constantly joke that all those anthro characters came to be because humans couldn't stop dicking everything that moved, until natural selection decided the fittest females of any species were the ones human men would simp for.
Except canines as their males would also look like androgynous cute twinks for some reason everyone pretends not to know about.
Men have a naturally darker skin pigmentation than women, the rest is just fake add ons because women are the biggest liars on the planet.
You brain has been poisoned by porn, this is not true, and it is insane how many people believe this.
No, a man from the same ethnic group and similar skin tone will have a naturally darker pigmentation compared to a woman, you wouldn't notice at a glance but it is there.
anyone who is okay with thos must be executed there is no room for cowardice either you want to fuck an anthro lady or you don't
I invite you to provide any proof at all of this claim. You are simply used to porn and the media depicting it and are sick in the head without knowing it.
>complain when female character don't wear enough clothes
>now complaining about female characters wearing clothes
pick one SJWs
Women need more calcium during pregnancy and lactation. The body synthesizes vitamin D from sunlight, which helps it absorb calcium. Women adapted to have lighter skin so their bodies absorb more calcium.
sciencedirect.com
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>normal human voices
I went to school with a guy who had a Daffy-esque lisp.
If you took those things away from her, could you tell she was female?
Imagine raping these two ducks lol
Yes.
Not Yea Forums, but… Manako, from One Punch Man, simply tells the cast she’s a female and tells them her name, and that’s it. The audience now knows the monster is female, you don’t need to slap breasts or a humanoid hourglass figure or hair on it to tell the audience it’s female.
>>complain when female character don't wear enough clothes
Valid if the male characters are clothed and dressed normally while the female characters are barely dressed and wear skimpy outfits.
>>now complaining about female characters wearing clothes
Valid if only the males wear no clothes, don’t have hair extensions, and have plain body types.
Most writers/animators are lonely. They don't know how to write females at all because they only interact with their mothers, if that. (Did you ever notice how unrealistic the behavior of most fictional love interests is? They act like the whole writing staff has never seen a member of the opposite sex enjoy their company and be friendly around them. Because most writers are loners who have never experienced such behavior.)
THe part that really gets it is they always try to make them more smarter than there male counteparts when we know women ain't smart
this was a comedy series with ecchi in it, this was part of the joke and also so they could make the females hot
all these people blaming writers and artists when the premise of the post is talking about corporate demands
I’m sure there are writers out there who design female characters that look similar to male characters, but there will usually be some suits up top that will demand some changes for “marketability”.
Writers don't design characters unless tey're also artists
I want to impale Lola and get her hooked on big human cock
I meant artists lol, don’t mind my poor choice of words
understandable
YES.
Yeah but in the looney tunes show, they did at least try to give each character a personality and what not.
Someone's probably already said it ITT, but that's the whole point of Tina Russo, she's a duck, sure, but she's NOT "looney" at all, she's got a normal name, a normal voice, a normal personality, does normal things, she finds Daffy's name weird, she works at a copy shop and is irritable and grumpy. I'm actually pretty surprised she goes barefoot for most of the show, I feel like having her wear actual shoes all the time would help sell the point.
Other shows, yeah, that's kind of a plague on the industry, I don't know if I should blame the artists being coomers or if corporate wants them to play it safe or something, but girl characters in loads of shows are either so "normal" that they're basically just not there, or they follow some GRRRRL POWAH trope to the T.
The other outcome is that they're part of the show/game/movie and fit in reasonably well, but they have their own breed of plot armor to prevent them from getting injured at all.
I played an older game fairly recently, and every male person you fight ends up injured, missing teeth, having a black eye, bloody nose, whatever, or they're dead.
Every female character you beat ends up with a band-aid on some part of them, even on their helmet in some cases. No injuries otherwise.
90’s Lola is so out of place
Why does Space Jam 2 Lola look like Slappy Squirrel?
based
>I want to impale Lola and get hooked on her big human cock
>females should look like males because... they just should, ok?
Heh. Nice try troon.