Authors whose names perfectly describe their work

Since Yea Forums has turned into /r9k/ and /pol/ lite the only worthwhile threads to make are insincere volatile threads that incite fanboys to defend their paragons.

Wow, champ. You have such insight and are so eloquent. Cant wait for your next hit. Keep up the shitposting.

Basadx

holy fucking based

>still obsessed with being on a political team
Not gonna make it

JK Rowling, because I always say Just kidding after and then start Rowling with laughter

You tried

And I am sure you are actually making worthwhile contributions to literature discussion on this board as well.

Based

Because he never wrote a novel and is revered as a genius. Fucking hell. Nabokov is a much better writer.

el user SAAAAAPPPBEEEEEÉEEEEE

lole'd

>Shakespeare never wrote a novel and is revered genius. Fucking hell. Nabokov is much better.

>David Foster Wallace never wrote a novel and is revered genius. Pynchon is much better

Was the novel even invented when Shaky was writing?

El absoluto locohombre

>Dante Alighieri

As a Canadian about to read the Inferno: Down to Hell I go here, eh?

only plebs think that meme was political in the first place. only the butthurt made it political

>who is Cervantes

Embarassing. Look, some genres are held in greater esteem throughout the times mate. Only women were writing novels heen the genre took off in 18th

Glad this thread turned from a fun word game in to two sides arguing some basic ass bs about the origin of novels, both sides equally as ignorant.

Harold Bloom says Don Quixote is the first modern novel.

So this clearly means Cervantes was better than Shakespeare. I like where this is going.

t.not a uni scholar

And if women can write novels then why can't Borges? Was he too lazy?

And you yourself have nothing of relevance to say. Shame on you.

He was blind and dictated his stories to an assistant. It would have been impractical for him to write novels, because he’d have to memorize too much text.

faena.com/aleph/articles/borges-and-the-art-of-not-writing-a-novel/

The Invention of Tradition
Autor: Eric Hobsbawm, Terence Ranger

leemaslibro.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-invention-of-tradition.html?m=0

Most of Borges' stories were written before he went blind. He went blind around '55. Sooooo

This

Immanuel Kant, or rather, I'm-manlet who Can't write coherent sentences.

Attached: extreme despair.jpg (800x572, 150K)

ebin

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA COPE

ITT: We cope with the fact that Borges was lazy and is overrated as fuck.

Lmao

All I did was send the link, I said nothing, fucking clown, you enjoy laughing huh you fucking pussy, Borges probably, maybe, had the inability to complete a novel due to being unskilled, lack of strength. Maybe, perhaps, probably

>Where are all the words that Borges never wrote?
your link is full of horseshit

here's a fact : Borges wrote 0 novels

Yeah alright, you win, I’m done, finished user, let’s get some coffee

Attached: 82684552-384A-4CEC-A1F4-4D104AF27B7F.jpg (225x225, 10K)

he has never actually read el quijote though. he just read a few iterations of don quixote, written several years after cervantes masterpiece.

Paul REEEE don't steal my waifu

Attached: 401px-Nietzsche_paul-ree_lou-von-salome188.jpg (401x600, 48K)

E.E. Cummings could have been a poem by E.E. Cummings.

Emily Dickinson. Because namedropping her around liberal women might get your dick in, son.

>Harold Bloom says Don Quixote is the first modern novel.
Bloom is a faggot.
The first modern novel is called The Tale of Genji.

nice try, weeb.

Soren Kierkegaard literally means Sore Churchyard or Serious Graveyard.

Attached: kierkegaard_eyes.jpg (162x54, 4K)

no puedo creerlo, dijo lo que estamos pensando, absolutamente basad(o/a)

Kant is a cunt that can't get it up

Kek

is it "because I read Tolstoy"? onions no habla lingo el Diego

So did Milton during the later part of his life, and yet he wrote Paradise Lost

BORGES ETERNALLY BTFO AS A NO TALENT PSEUD HACK WHO CAN ONLY VAGUELY INTIMATE IDEAS AND CAN NEVER FULLY REALIZE THEM