Is love an illusion?

Is love an illusion?
Is romanticism pointless?
Are all women biologically liars?

Attached: file.png (236x253, 42K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xAMgQQMZ9Lk
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

love = absolute for the dogs
romanticism = shilled by degenerates and drug addicts of 19th century

youtube.com/watch?v=xAMgQQMZ9Lk

Attached: 240px-Søren_Kierkegaard_(1813-1855)_-_(cropped).jpg (240x339, 22K)

All women aren't liars but they are genetically predisposed to not hurting anyone's feelings and parroting whatever the most common opinion in society/the group they are currently with.

otherwise they risked being killed by an angry man

Does it feel like an illusion? Also no women are awesome.

Attached: 52075968_1221503827974457_8658481239252008960_n.png (600x606, 562K)

>women are awesome
DELUSIONAL, women suck

No
No
Yes

Are you a fat lonely virgin? Yes.

Are you a woman? Yes.

>genetically predisposed to not hurting anyone's feelings and parroting whatever the most common opinion in society/the group they are currently with.
How the fuck is this genetic. Jesus christ, you guys are really stupid

>he's so virginal he can't tell men from women
Ohh boy, time for "the talk."

Attached: girls_laughing.png (449x401, 490K)

Platonic love is only possible between two males. Women are basically subhuman and cannot experience higher emotions.

yes
no
maybe

What does it all have to do with literature, you little wojakposting cunt?

>maybe
definitely*

Yes
Yes
Nah, biology don't work like that

Attached: 963502BC-A209-4BAB-B4AE-136DC051C852.png (460x1062, 426K)

Love exists, but so many people have a shallow and childish idea of what love actually looks like. So many people become jaded when they realise that love requires sacrifice and requires effort and empathy.

>....and this is why I'm still a virgin. You see, most girls become jaded after realising that True Love™ requires sacrifices and effort, like dating vertically and facially challenged bigbrained men like myself!

Yes
No
Yes

From best to worst:

1. Dialectical love between God and Man - Henosis

2. Dialectical love between Man and Man - Heaven

3. Dialectical love between God and Woman Dialectically loving Man - Revelation

4. Dialectical love between God and Woman - Eschatology

5. Dialectical love between Man and Woman - Dualism

6. Mereological love between God and Man - Archonism

7. Mereological love between Man and Man - Amnesia

8. Mereological love between God and Woman Mereologically loving Man - Damnation

9. Mereological love between God and Woman - Purgatory

10. Mereological love between Man and Woman - HELL

Attached: cd82ae5b28e6c469d09333d6367fdf8a.jpg (602x506, 100K)

Everything's an illusion; romanticism is the correct attitude to the sublime; it's what makes them sublime.

Only familial love is real, love between strangers is an illusion that only exists to ensure more family units are formed
Yes
All people are biological liars and cheaters, but some choose to grow beyond that

Love exists solely in the soul that’s longing is matched by its willingness to give without expectation or return. For that is the nature of divine realms

Attached: 6D3BB419-77FC-4CF0-AFEE-FE72C7582C95.jpg (1280x804, 254K)

>Are all women biologically liars?
It is hard to say whether this tendency is innate, just as it is difficult to say whether women are conscious of their lying--for, if a creature does not value truth, if they don't care about it in general, what is a lie to them? Truth and lie are indistinguishable. Can an animal steal? It does not know better: does it know about property? Only a man, fully aware of his actions, can take from another man what he knows does not belong to him. True, he will rationalize it--and women are much the same way--but, then, what is really taking place is the subjugation of rationality, the enslavement of it to another master. Yet truth exerts a powerful influence, and the more one is aware of the truth, the harder it is to conceal it from oneself. There is a terrible spite fostered by the effort toward concealing the truth from oneself, but without it a lie cannot take place. This is the spite of which the narrator of Notes from the Underground accuses himself. It is even more difficult to distinguish self-deprecation from true repentance, for often times, in a man, self-deprecation is actually a form of spite, an egoistic, self-satisfying pity that does not tend toward repentance, but actually tries to prepare itself for further transgression.

Now, where are women in all of this? Well, we have briefly investigated the male liar and his psychology, and we even have famous works of literature dealing with the subject--but where is the "Notes from the Underground" written by a woman? I mean, a brief narrative about a woman who knows she is a liar and a coward, full of resentment and spitefulness toward her fellow woman, who yet cannot surpass her condition? Such a work does not exist, and as we discuss it we become aware how ludicrous it is even to try to conceive of such a thing. The matter is much too deep for us to believe for a moment that such complex and tumultuous inner activity is taking place in the mind of a young female. There is no evidence for it--whereas with a man we can see his strange, erratic behavior, surpassing mere shyness and entering into the absurd, or even manic. This tells us, not only that there lie grave, unresolved conflicts in the man, but most significantly, that he is aware of what is going on, oscillating from peak to valley on a stormy tempest, struggling to stay afloat.

What we can only infer from all this is that, indeed, there is no such thing as a female liar, for the simple reason that her awareness is not deep or thorough enough to conceive of truth as an end in itself. For her, truth and lie are judged according to utility, not to inner consistency. Observe the woman who has just lied and you will find a creature utterly carefree and unashamed, so long as she got what she wanted. If women spent as much time estimating the worth of their soul as they did their bodies, perhaps they would develop a consciousness powerful enough to judge, and to be a true sovereign.

Women don't practice empathy, women practice quorum. It's a truth or lie if the crowd says so, there's no internal moral compass, only flow of the river.

There is what's known in popular society as love but it's typically quite shallow. It's a love based on the body and to a smaller extent the personality. True love can be found when one realizes that all life is one. Once that is realized you are able to see past the body and its personality. A personality is only the formed reactions to the experience of life and the resistence of the painbody. If you can escape the grasp of manipulation of the pain body you are able to be present in the moment and understand that another person is a soul, part of the greater life consciousness and are not their body. Before the characteristics of the body you are life as is all other life. See past the inner material mechanics of the mind that so many believe to be their own reactions to life while in fact it's simply a going along with what the mind is forcing you to believe and act out. There are thoughts that the physical mind spinds into action which are then thought to be what someone is really thinking and thought of themselves but then there can be an awareness of the act of thoughts being formed. It is imperative to be able to be an observer of the thoughts and chemical emotions of the physical mind and to then observe the same in others. When you experience a lover in the grips of negativity it's important to understand that they are being manipulated by a mechanism in their physical mind that all humans deal with, it's not who they truly are. They are you.

EXCUSES
Listen bitch, if you can type and you can skype with your nigger dikes then you can choose flight or fight
SAGED now gimme me my money ho

Attached: 4EDCDAB2-AAFF-4357-8CD4-2A75D4F4027D.jpg (765x383, 75K)