Why does DC hate Superman?

Why does DC hate Superman?

Attached: CCo7o6Gh-U4-HD.jpg (1280x720, 159.18K)

Why do you keep spamming these threads?

I'm lonely.

Batman is also lonely

Superman can be black, fuck it. There can be more than one Superman. Clark Kent however should stay white. Miles Morales exists but Peter Parker is still white. That's where the line should be drawn. Don't erase the original character just to be woke.

Attached: RDT_20210919_1420562277096467558140843.jpg (1040x1600, 319.97K)

>YouTube thumbnail for OP image
Holy cringe

Ah yes lets make a bunch of fucking official branded factory made OC's instead. It may be the lessor of two evils but it's still gay as fuck.

You have a cartoon, show and multiple comics where he is white. Meanwhile Black Superman have multiple click bait rumors. Even if they have a new black guy name John Henry take up the Superman mantle you will cry about being replaced. Just like how you cry about Miles.

They've already done this though. Most iconic comic book characters have at least three legacy characters that happen to be a different race. The characters already exist. Use them to add some diversity instead of changing the already iconic character. They could make a movie about Steel, but Hollywood would rather just use the Clark Kent story but make it blacked.

Just because they did it before doesn't mean it's good.

What they should do is put John Henry in a movie with Clark, then give him an origin movie. Who could complain then?

Please go get a bitch.

What I'm saying is that the offshoot characters exist already and we don't need black Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne.

If a Steel movie gets made people will start complaining about Blacks latching onto Steel, like they did with Black Panther.

That's kinda where I'm at. I have no problem with a black Superman. Hell, I don't even have a problem with an alternate, black version of Superman being his world's Clark Kent, instead of Calvin Ellis or Val Zod.

The problem is that WB has no interest in making movies with the regular, default, white Superman. It doesn't seem like this movie is going to be in ADDITION TO making, say, Superman films with Henry Cavill or something. It's a REPLACEMENT FOR that. They're not doing it like Todd Phillips Joker, where they explore an alternate and fresh take of the character, without derailing what Reeves was doing.

I think that's kind of a bummer, especially because they haven't made a straight up Superman movie since the '80s.

Imagine if they let Coates/Abrams do their thing, they did allowed Cavill to come back for solo movies with a competent director to do their thing, and somewhere along the line, we get a Superman Beyond thing where these two guys and other Supermen unite to save the multiverse.

Nope. They don't wanna do that. They'll do a million versions of Batman and Joker, but they have no faith in Superman. It doesn't feel like this is a "we wanna celebrate how many cool ways there are to do Superman by doing another cool version" thing. It feels like a "we think the character is broken and doesn't work, and this is how you fix him" thing.

Rumor has it that Warner Bros don't want Cavil back because he asked for too much money, oh and because the casuals still thinks he's boring.

if supes will be black, will lois be black aswell ? or will they make her a coalburner

She will be a coalburner. The jews want to hurt us.

From what I heard, they had no plans for a proper Superman movie, but wanted him to come back for small cameos, like Shazam. He refused to return to the role unless it was something of substance. He wanted a proper movie.

Of course audiences found him boring. He was in movies that give Superman nothing to do. MoS sets up this theme of having self-determination instead of doing what you're "supposed" to do by having Kal be the first non-designer baby in generations. And the script still has him wandering around moping and hiding himself because Earth Dad told him so, and then putting on a costume and flying because Space Dad told him so, and then revealing himself because Zod told him so. He has no character or agency, he just reacts to things happening.

BvS gave him less screentime than Spidey in Civil War. It consists of him looking sad as people on CNN talk about him, and looking miserable any time he has to save somebody. The movie is about Batman and his motivations.

Then he's dead for 75% of Justice League.

Cavil was never given a chance.

Attached: lois-lane-black-header.jpg (1400x700, 285.24K)

At least we still have the Reeves movies.

>Who could complain then?

People were whining about Black Panther for ages before it was even out, claiming it was going to bomb hard, and then when it was a huge success they desperately tried to paint the character as actually le redpilled and anti-sjw in an embarrassing level of cope when their racist tirades couldn't gain traction. Racist dipshits gonna be racist dispshits no matter what

>And the script still has him wandering around moping and hiding himself

He was seeking the reason he was on Earth, found it turned into a superhero when an alien threat arrived. Of course it was depressing when you have to wander and hide your true self, he couldn't stay anywhere because he kept savings people and having to leave. It was part of his burden as an alien being. He always had agency, he simply had others give him guidance like taking the time to find out why he was on Earth before making a giant life altering decision as to what he is going to do with his life. All Zod did was give a venue for Clark to become a public hero and win people's trust.

BvS is about his existence being a polarizing event and Clark learning to live with the hardships and consequences of his choice, like some people not liking him and trying to destroy and vilify him and trying to smear his actions.

In Justice League he is Earth's ultimate hope and savior. Just because you're too brain-dead to understand the grand narrative because it doesn't follow a typical cartoon structure does not make Cavill's Superman bad.

>bait shit
>spammed by youtube tards looking for clicks and impressionable youth
>spammed on a daily basis
>retard doesnt even read comics or understand that black superman has been a thing since Crisis on Infinite Earths

Its not even the outrage bait that irritates me at this point. its the quality of it and how easy it is to expose anons who constantly come to these threads despite not reading shit. bitch about weird and random race flips that were introduced with no explanation. that makes sense. but are you fucking mongs really losing your shit over something thats been canon since the 90s? in an alternate universe? fucking kys

Attached: e2432b42c63e82e6a60e428a9e696717.jpg (241x500, 36.82K)

>reeee blakk soopermans
Really faggot?

No shit variant characters exsist but you have to be disingenuous if you think they are doing this for any other reason than archaic Red vs Blue NA politics
It's not
>we want this version of Superman cause his stories are good
Its
>we want this version of Superman cause he's a negro
And nothing more

They sucked dick so badly at making movies so making a black Superman is their last attempt at reminding the world that they still exist too, not just Marvel.

Unfortunately, Superman and Barman seems like the only characters they know how to make. They can't come up with anyone else past those two.

And don't give me that "B-B-BUH GREEN LANTERN THO" bullshit; they did it once, they never revisited again, so it doesn't fucking count. Sam with Shazam.

are you available?

>Seething over capeshit
Go touch grass.

>fags spent almost a decade shitting on Henry Cavill and Man of Steel
>DC finally decides to ditch him
>fags pretend they always liked him
So unpredictable...

Attached: 1628185639582.jpg (700x703, 260.93K)

You can hate Zach Snyder's trash and love Superman you fucking retard.

You're one of those people who think that people laughing at the "Martha" thing didn't understand it, so you respond "you fool, it was about Batman seeing Superman as a person with a family that he was going to destroy just like Joe Chill did his own!"

Yeah, we all understand the filmmaker's intention. We all saw the same movie. None of that keeps it from being bad or hilarious. Just because a scene has a story reason doesn't automatically make the scene ingenious. In the end, it's still literally a scene where a guy becomes best friends with the guy he was trying to kill because their moms have the same name.

Attached: Sad Batman Cosplaying as Superman.gif (405x251, 1.58M)

ESL hours

DC can't sell Superman because they don't have it in them to write the character.
They hate what the character represents.

T h i s
h
i
s

America will collapse in 100 years when all the white people are deleted and nobody can run the society anymore.

Black Superman is based.

Went from this…..

Attached: 24CA3619-2F05-4E8F-B022-09876206C9B2.jpg (854x1341, 1.13M)

There's a silver lining. Now when he's black they don't have to make him gay.

Attached: america without whites.gif (500x361, 986.61K)

They’ll never make Clark gay because this son is

Clark isn't Superman anymore user...he's dead.

You’re right. And so is Calvin Ellis.

So it’s Jon Kent’s and Val Zod’s time to shine.

Attached: 87734C21-0F9E-4A97-AA20-B3105D0499F2.jpg (829x667, 511.72K)

>no technology, architecture or anything of value
>forced to perform meaningless circle ritual in the name of diverse science sacrifice ai God while kikles try to act the betters
shit sucks my fellow darkies

Why can't a "Straight up Superman" film be done with a Black actor.

None of the material in the Dinner Superman for example requires an actor of a specific race

Superman being black is not an issue but can he eat a mountain of hamburgers? Can he still beat Goku in a world championship eating competition?

Can be lay pipe to Chichi?

>don’t give fans what they want
>fans don’t like it
>guess Superman has no fans so let’s change him
>don’t give fans what they want

President Superman is a good idea though trying to tap into Obama’s popularity seems silly since he was basically the same as George w Bush

President Superman >>>> Man of Murder
it's not hard to understand

>we all understand the filmmaker's intention
>it's still literally a scene where a guy becomes best friends with the guy he was trying to kill because their moms have the same name.

I like how you typed a whole paragraph to bitch yet still admitted you didn't understand the movie.

>The problem is that WB has no interest in making movies with the regular, default, white Superman. It doesn't seem like this movie is going to be in ADDITION TO making, say, Superman films with Henry Cavill or something. It's a REPLACEMENT FOR that. They're not doing it like Todd Phillips Joker, where they explore an alternate and fresh take of the character, without derailing what Reeves was doing.
I don't think you understand how badly Snyder damaged Superman in the eyes of normies. They HAVE to go with a visually different one so no one thinks it's Zack's sad murder man.

The leaks said they’ll make her half Asian or half Latina, since her white father traveled the world while in the army.

>Of course it was depressing when you have to wander and hide your true self,
So what you're saying is that Superman was actually a trans metaphor all along.

Both of these characters are Superman tho

Lois tends to look half asian whenever she has black hair anyway so I'm not sure why this is a bad thing.

and then they fuck upon realizing men make for better partners than Lois Lane.

>None of the material in the Dinner Superman for example requires an actor of a specific race
Being lovingly adopted by a midwestern family requires he be white.

>Who could complain then?
Yea Forums.

Make him a midget while you're at it

>>Lois Lane

Attached: DB679CAA-6361-47DE-97D5-862E522E8A9B.jpg (960x1148, 604.18K)